TX Gov: Kinky in 2nd behind weakening Perry (Survey USA) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 07:48:39 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2006 Elections
  2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
  TX Gov: Kinky in 2nd behind weakening Perry (Survey USA) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: TX Gov: Kinky in 2nd behind weakening Perry (Survey USA)  (Read 6280 times)
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,817
Marshall Islands


« on: June 28, 2006, 02:28:31 AM »

Governor Rick Perry (R) - 35%
Kinky Friedman (Independent) - 21%,
Chris Bell (D) - 20%
Carole Keeton Strayhorn (Independent) - 19%

Perry falling, Kinky rising, Strayhorn in last...happy day. Smiley
There was a big change in the education level between this poll and the one in may:

Grad School 30% +5%
College Graduate 28% +4%
Some College  32% -9%

Is this typical of polling like this (600 likely voters, random phone dialing).
Logged
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,817
Marshall Islands


« Reply #1 on: June 28, 2006, 04:05:46 PM »

It seems to me like college graduates would be even less likely to vote for Friedman, so that surprises me.
No College: Perry 51, Bell 17, Strayhorn 16, Friedman 9
Some College: Perry 35, Friedman 22, Strayhorn 22, Bell 15
College Graduate: Perry 35, Friedman 27, Bell 18, Strayhorn 17
Grad School: Perry 32, Bell 27, Friedman 19, Strayhorn 17.

An interesting gender gap for independents:

Perry: M 38%, F 33%
Bell: M 21%, F 19%
Friedman: M 25%, F 17%
Strayhorn: M 14%, F 25%
Logged
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,817
Marshall Islands


« Reply #2 on: July 05, 2006, 12:00:09 AM »

Okay, I'm new here, so could someone please tell me why an incumbent Republican governor in a GOP state is having so much trouble? Is Bush bringing Perry down, or is it Perry himself?
If not for Bush, Perry would not have been elected Lt.Governor in 1998.

You'd expect a Republican to win about 60:40.  Right now he is ahead about 40:20 over Bell.  There is no reason to assume that it is Perry vs. Strayhorn-Bell-Friedman.  It is quite unlikely that all the votes will coalesce on a single candidate.  With Bell doing so poor, some voters are going think, "why the hell not" and vote for Friedman, who is running against politics.  They're voters who will either not vote or vote for Friedman.  And there are voters who are constitutionally incapable for voting for anyone but a Democrat.  They're not going to vote for Friedman.

Some of the Strayhorn support and Bell support may switch.  Bell is running hard against Strayhorn right now.  But if Strayhorn is seen as dropping, some of her GOP vote will go to Perry; her Democrat vote will go to Bell, and her anti-politician will go to Friedman.

And we don't really know if the poll is reliable or not.  It doesn't make sense that Perry would drop 20 points in Harris County in a month, and almost none elsewhere; or the number of graduate school voters would increase by 5% in a month.
Logged
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,817
Marshall Islands


« Reply #3 on: July 05, 2006, 01:20:45 AM »

there are voters who are constitutionally incapable for voting for anyone but a Democrat.  They're not going to vote for Friedman.
Or do you mean that their own constitution (their moral fibre, etc.) will not allow them?
This one.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 15 queries.