Would Jesus have approved of the Holocaust? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 08:57:29 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Would Jesus have approved of the Holocaust? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Would Jesus have approved of the Holocaust?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 42

Author Topic: Would Jesus have approved of the Holocaust?  (Read 8080 times)
Undisguised Sockpuppet
Straha
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787
Uruguay


Political Matrix
E: 6.52, S: 2.00

« on: July 06, 2006, 03:39:40 PM »

Yes.
Logged
Undisguised Sockpuppet
Straha
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787
Uruguay


Political Matrix
E: 6.52, S: 2.00

« Reply #1 on: July 08, 2006, 11:34:04 AM »

Given that the Old Testament is filled with story after story of the elder brother(s) incurring JHVH's wrath in some fashion and being dispossesed in favor of the younger, the idea of JHVH abandoning the Jews in favor of somebody else isn't all that far fetched.  The very last thing you want to be in an Old Testament tale is the first born.
Indeed. *is glad to be both not the first born and atheist*
Logged
Undisguised Sockpuppet
Straha
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787
Uruguay


Political Matrix
E: 6.52, S: 2.00

« Reply #2 on: July 08, 2006, 10:26:09 PM »

The very last thing you want to be in an Old Testament tale is the first born.

Although it's still better than being an unborn fetus, a newly married woman who is found not to be a virgin, or a child who teases a prophet for being bald.
Indeed. Didn't bears rip that child apart?
Logged
Undisguised Sockpuppet
Straha
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787
Uruguay


Political Matrix
E: 6.52, S: 2.00

« Reply #3 on: July 08, 2006, 10:51:47 PM »

The very last thing you want to be in an Old Testament tale is the first born.

Although it's still better than being an unborn fetus, a newly married woman who is found not to be a virgin, or a child who teases a prophet for being bald.
Indeed. Didn't bears rip that child apart?

Actually, it was 42 children, all of which were ripped apart by bears.
Kewl. I'd love to see that.
Logged
Undisguised Sockpuppet
Straha
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787
Uruguay


Political Matrix
E: 6.52, S: 2.00

« Reply #4 on: July 09, 2006, 11:04:00 AM »

The very last thing you want to be in an Old Testament tale is the first born.

But weren't Enoch (taken directly into heaven without experiencing death), Noah (the only righteous man found on earth), Abraham (the father of the faithful and the recipient of God's inheritance), and Jesus (Son of God) all the first born?
Didn't Jesus have four older brothers and an undefined number of sisters?

The Virgin Mary was anywhere from 9 to 14 when she had Baby Jesus, so how could a 9-14 year old possibly give birth to 5+ children?

To respond directly to the question however, probably not. Though I'm sure many Christian theologians such as Martin Luther would have.




And many moslem theologians
Logged
Undisguised Sockpuppet
Straha
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787
Uruguay


Political Matrix
E: 6.52, S: 2.00

« Reply #5 on: July 11, 2006, 09:49:32 PM »

No because he would have been gassed. Rmeember jesus was jewish.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 14 queries.