Lieberman-Lamont Showdown: The Results are coming in
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 09, 2024, 03:14:08 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Lieberman-Lamont Showdown: The Results are coming in		 « previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 ... 18
Author Topic: Lieberman-Lamont Showdown: The Results are coming in  (Read 50536 times)
Flying Dog
Jtfdem
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,404
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #125 on: August 08, 2006, 08:06:30 PM »
Quote from: Al Widdershins on August 08, 2006, 08:05:34 PM
128/748: NL 56.3, JL 43.6

Most precincts in so far have been in areas that (according to the pundits) were likely to favour Lamont.

dang
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #126 on: August 08, 2006, 08:06:48 PM »
Tradesports has Lamont up in the mid-90s.  This mirrors the Kilgore v. Kaine race election night.  Not looking good for Joe.
Logged
Cylon Candidate
Rookie
**
Posts: 56
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #127 on: August 08, 2006, 08:08:08 PM »
9:00

126 of 748 precincts - 17 percent

Ned Lamont 29,463 - 56 percent

Joe Lieberman  22,898 - 44 percent
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,936
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #128 on: August 08, 2006, 08:10:12 PM »
56/44 to Lamont now. Most of Bridgeport is in, but it's still tight.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #129 on: August 08, 2006, 08:10:24 PM »
Can someone explain to me why, to paraphrase DailyKos, conventional wisdom says that Lieberman will do best in urban areas?
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,509
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #130 on: August 08, 2006, 08:11:23 PM »
Minorities.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #131 on: August 08, 2006, 08:11:43 PM »
Thanks, BRTD.

55-45 Lamont with 25% reporting.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,936
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #132 on: August 08, 2006, 08:12:55 PM »
Polls have generally shown Lieberman doing better with low income voters; in CT urban precincts tend to be working class.
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #133 on: August 08, 2006, 08:13:26 PM »

arent most blacks anti-war?
Logged
Boris
boris78
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,098
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -1.55, S: -4.52

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #134 on: August 08, 2006, 08:16:07 PM »
Is the AP gonna call this for Lamont anytime soon?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,936
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #135 on: August 08, 2006, 08:19:13 PM »
54/46 to Lamont; the gap has been slowly shrinking for a while now.

Lamont is currently leading in New Haven, but only 11/45 have reported there yet.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,509
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #136 on: August 08, 2006, 08:19:26 PM »

So are most CT whites at this point, especially Democratic primary voters. Hell, Lieberman is about the only non-anti-war CT Democrat at this point.

I suspect that lower income voters are more turned off by the wealth limousine liberal image portrayed of Lamont. Lieberman has more blue collar appeal, it makes sense.
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #137 on: August 08, 2006, 08:20:23 PM »
Lieberman spent $10 million on this primary (more than double what Lamont spent).
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #138 on: August 08, 2006, 08:21:58 PM »
Quote from: Al Widdershins on August 08, 2006, 08:19:13 PM
54/46 to Lamont; the gap has been slowly shrinking for a while now.

Lamont is currently leading in New Haven, but only 11/45 have reported there yet.


Which site are you on, Al?

That's dissappointing-New Haven is Joe's backyard.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,936
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #139 on: August 08, 2006, 08:22:13 PM »
Lieberman has narrowly carried New Britain, but Lamont has narrowly carried New London.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #140 on: August 08, 2006, 08:22:48 PM »
38% reporting

53.6% for Lamont

The AP calling this would be a mistake.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,936
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #141 on: August 08, 2006, 08:23:57 PM »
287/748  NL 53.6, JL 46.4

---
courant.com, but I think ap are running it
Logged
Cylon Candidate
Rookie
**
Posts: 56
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #142 on: August 08, 2006, 08:26:03 PM »
9:20

287 of 748 precincts - 38 percent

Ned Lamont 61,449 - 54 percent

Joe Lieberman 53,159 - 46 percent

Looking to be fairly close...
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #143 on: August 08, 2006, 08:27:28 PM »
44% reporting

53.1% Lamont
46.9% Lieberman
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,936
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #144 on: August 08, 2006, 08:27:43 PM »
53/47

Lamont still leads in New Haven, but it's now tight.
Logged
HardRCafé
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,364
Italy
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #145 on: August 08, 2006, 08:27:59 PM »
This is sort of exciting so far.
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #146 on: August 08, 2006, 08:28:08 PM »
45% reporting:

Lamont  53.06%
Lieberman  46.91%
Logged
jerusalemcar5
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,731
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -8.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #147 on: August 08, 2006, 08:29:30 PM »
Lamont still leads by 7,000 votes though, not too bad of a lead.
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #148 on: August 08, 2006, 08:31:12 PM »
Good news for Lieberman-all of Grenich has reported.

However, nothing from Stamford yet--I'm guessing that's Lamont country?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,936
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #149 on: August 08, 2006, 08:31:22 PM »
So far Lamont's best town is Cornwall (over 90%), while Lieberman's best is East Haven (65%).
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 ... 18  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.048 seconds with 12 queries.