Lieberman-Lamont Showdown: The Results are coming in
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 10:29:58 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Lieberman-Lamont Showdown: The Results are coming in
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 ... 18
Author Topic: Lieberman-Lamont Showdown: The Results are coming in  (Read 49607 times)
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #250 on: August 08, 2006, 09:29:02 PM »

Lieberman outspent Lamont by more than 2 to 1, suckers.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #251 on: August 08, 2006, 09:29:07 PM »

Most of the heavily Lamont areas have reported.

The remainder would have to be pretty heavily Lieberman.  I'm not sure the remainder is all that pro-Lieberman.  It's pretty much been stagnant since about 60%.

I'm not sure.  With one or two exceptions, Lieberman won each town by less than 60% of the vote.  His support has to comming from some place.
Logged
Smash255
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,450


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #252 on: August 08, 2006, 09:29:13 PM »

Looks like Lieberman will need at least 60%, and probably 65% of the remaining votes in order to win.  Which is virtually impossible
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #253 on: August 08, 2006, 09:29:35 PM »

If this was a general election, I would have already called it, fwiw.  I am extremely, extremely close to calling it in the primary, though.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #254 on: August 08, 2006, 09:29:40 PM »

People are calling it for Lamont based upon precincts that haven't reported yet.

Of course it's not over until the Connecticut For Lieberman party sings.

Where are those precincts?
Logged
Joe Biden 2020
BushOklahoma
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,921
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.77, S: 3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #255 on: August 08, 2006, 09:29:52 PM »

If Lieberman does win as an Indy, that would seriouisly injure or possibly kill the Democrats chances of taking back the Senate in 2006 and might even serve to increase the Republican majority.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #256 on: August 08, 2006, 09:30:01 PM »

Lieberman outspent Lamont by more than 2 to 1, suckers.

Yes, and it's coming darn close to paying off.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,676
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #257 on: August 08, 2006, 09:30:32 PM »

Been 625 for a while now. Night.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #258 on: August 08, 2006, 09:30:47 PM »


Sleep well.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,707


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #259 on: August 08, 2006, 09:30:51 PM »

Lieberman outspent Lamont by more than 2 to 1, suckers.

Not to mention the support from the out of touch inside the beltway elite.
Logged
Smash255
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,450


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #260 on: August 08, 2006, 09:31:34 PM »

If Lieberman does win as an Indy, that would seriouisly injure or possibly kill the Democrats chances of taking back the Senate in 2006 and might even serve to increase the Republican majority.

It may hurt the Dems gaining the Senate, but the GOP is not going to pick up seats, not at all.
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #261 on: August 08, 2006, 09:31:41 PM »

Yes, and it's coming darn close to paying off.

But the "liberal" media said that Lamont was "buying the race"?

Logged
HardRCafé
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,364
Italy
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #262 on: August 08, 2006, 09:31:59 PM »

Whatever, can you say Liberman (ID-CN)?

Lieberman has my endorsement for Idaho Constitution Party!
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #263 on: August 08, 2006, 09:33:45 PM »

Two more precincts in and Lamont gains a bit.
Logged
Flying Dog
Jtfdem
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,404
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #264 on: August 08, 2006, 09:34:11 PM »

Lieberman would caucas with the democrats. Atleast that what he says
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #265 on: August 08, 2006, 09:34:46 PM »

Whatever, can you say Liberman (ID-CN)?
Lieberman has my endorsement for Idaho Constitution Party!

Mine too!!
Logged
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #266 on: August 08, 2006, 09:35:21 PM »

I think Lamont could have enough momentum to win a general election; it may seem like a claim that is not based on reality now but as the Democratic nominee he would have the support of the DNC and DSCC and presumably get visits from Howard Dean and Hillary Clinton.  I think that Lieberman would find it hard to mount a significant challenge given the fact that official support for him would melt away and his Senate colleagues might even publicly call for him to stand aside.  
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,707


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #267 on: August 08, 2006, 09:35:30 PM »

Lieberman would caucas with the democrats. Atleast that what he says

You trust him? I don't. The Republicans will be supporting him if he doesn't do the right thing tonight/tommorrow.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #268 on: August 08, 2006, 09:37:06 PM »

Lieberman has had 6 towns with plus 60%.  They look like they are in the Hartford area.  That looks like his base.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #269 on: August 08, 2006, 09:37:38 PM »

Another new precinct just came in, and whatever it was actually hit Lamont pretty hard.  If this isn't isolated, Lieberman still has an outside chance.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,707


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #270 on: August 08, 2006, 09:38:18 PM »

Another new precinct just came in, and whatever it was actually hit Lamont pretty hard.  If this isn't isolated, Lieberman still has an outside chance.

One precinct doesn't mean much.
Logged
Joe Biden 2020
BushOklahoma
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,921
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.77, S: 3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #271 on: August 08, 2006, 09:38:29 PM »

Any numbers?
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #272 on: August 08, 2006, 09:38:39 PM »

Another new precinct just came in, and whatever it was actually hit Lamont pretty hard.  If this isn't isolated, Lieberman still has an outside chance.

it went from 628 to 648 and not much difference in the Lieberman/Lamont margin
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #273 on: August 08, 2006, 09:39:50 PM »

Another new precinct just came in, and whatever it was actually hit Lamont pretty hard.  If this isn't isolated, Lieberman still has an outside chance.

it went from 628 to 648 and not much difference in the Lieberman/Lamont margin

Are you sure it wasn't 647?  I am reasonably sure that the last update ended in a 7.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #274 on: August 08, 2006, 09:39:59 PM »

648 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 86.63%
   Name   Party   Votes   Pct
   Lamont, Ned   Dem   124,528   51.82
   Lieberman, Joe (i)   Dem   115,803   48.18

Getting close to needing 65% in the remaining precincts.  As I said, if this wasn't a primary, it's already over.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 ... 18  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.056 seconds with 13 queries.