Could an Independent Ever Win the Presidency?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 02:45:01 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Alternative Elections (Moderator: Dereich)
  Could an Independent Ever Win the Presidency?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Could an Independent Ever Win the Presidency?  (Read 2514 times)
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 30, 2006, 09:41:25 PM »

Idk, but I would think it is possible:
Here's one that could actaully happen

Tancredo/Santorum (R) 149
Clinton/Finegold (D) 114
Guilliani/Ben Nelson (I) 276

I'm off by one b/c I calculated manually b/c I used 2000 map to show Ind, but either way Guilliani/Nelson still have enough

Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 30, 2006, 10:36:06 PM »

Independent - John McCain/Brad Henry                 439
Democrat - Ted Kennedy/Kathleen Blanco                91
Republican - Jim Bunning/Robert Taft                          8

Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 31, 2006, 01:59:10 AM »

Let's go with a realistic possibility.  If in 1992 Perot has stayed in the whole time I think he would have done much better.



Clinton 231EV 35%PV
Bush 232EV 34%EV
Perot 75EV 30%PV
Other 0EV 1%PV

I see Perot as comapred to what actually happened taking votes from both Clinton and Bush, but more from Clinton as the Bush support was firmer, so the result would have been Perot taking states from both Bush and Clinton, but also causing some to swing from Clinton to Bush.  Now obviously given the House and Senate in 1993 where the Dems hold both the Senate and a majority of the House delegations Clinton/Gore wins once the Congress votes.  However with a 1992 like the above Perot or some other independent would have had a decent shot in 1996.
Logged
jerusalemcar5
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,731
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -8.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 31, 2006, 07:52:22 PM »

Idk, but I would think it is possible:
Here's one that could actaully happen

Tancredo/Santorum (R) 149
Clinton/Finegold (D) 114
Guilliani/Ben Nelson (I) 276

I'm off by one b/c I calculated manually b/c I used 2000 map to show Ind, but either way Guilliani/Nelson still have enough



Clinton/Feingold would win New York.  Especially with Tancredo pulling the conservative vote away.

I notice you continullay misspell the "fein" in Jewish names.  It isn't "fine".  just fyi.

Logged
Governor PiT
Robert Stark
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,631
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: -0.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 03, 2006, 03:01:53 PM »

A Guliani/Santorum ticket is more likely for the GOP, and Tancredo is more likely to run as an independent, with Ben Nelson as his VP, since he is a conservaitve Democrat and is tough on illegal immigration. I either scenario Clinton would win since the reps would be divided.
Logged
Colin
ColinW
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,684
Papua New Guinea


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 03, 2006, 04:32:31 PM »

Tancredo is more likely to run as an independent, with Ben Nelson as his VP, since he is a conservaitve Democrat and is tough on illegal immigration.

Why would Ben Nelson all of a sudden lose his mind?
Logged
kashifsakhan
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 525
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 18, 2006, 05:19:42 AM »

I think Perot had the best chance any independent's ever had. I dont see any independent winning in the forseeable future.

I really dont think someone like McCain would ever run as an independent.
Logged
Ban my account ffs!
snowguy716
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,632
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 22, 2006, 01:09:28 AM »

No way would Rudi win Minnesota over a Clinton/Feingold ticket.  Having Feingold on the ticket would do wonders to fire up the liberal base here.

Rudi Guilliani is great and all as a public speaker and has plenty of charisma.. but when it comes down to it... Feingold will bring home the bacon to the upper midwest.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,721


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 22, 2006, 01:12:08 AM »

Republicans:
Allen / Tancredo

Democrats:
Decline to nominate anyone

Indy:
Sanders / Weicker
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.041 seconds with 13 queries.