What Could Have Been....

[DownWithTheLeft]

While some states (like NJ) nominated the best challenger, others (FL) did not.  What states could have been vulnerable w/the right candidate?  Here's my opinion, feedback appreciated

AZ:
Gov. Napolitano would have been much better

CA:
Finestein was pretty much guaranteed to win

CT:
Jodi Rell possibly w/the Dems splitting between Lamont and Lieberman

DE:
Pretty unbeatable, possibly Rep. Castle

FL:
Long list basically w/everyone but Katherine Harris

HI:
Maybe Gov. Lingle or Lt. Gov. Aiona

IN:
Lugar was unbeatable considering Evan Bayh is already in the Senate

ME:
Snowe was pretty unbeatable

MD:
Probably nominated the best person

MA:
No one, absolutley no one

MI:
No one comes to mind

MN:
Maybe Gov. Pawlenty would have been better

MS:
Mike Moore could have made it a race

MO:
Probably the best

MT:
The best

NE:
Johanns would have killed him

NV:
Didn't real have a good candidate

NJ:
Absolute best w/the exception of his father

NM:
Unbeatable

NY:
Guilliani is the only one, and he wasn't even considered

ND:
Hoevan would've beaten him

OH:
Strickland was probably better

PA:
Probably the best

RI:
Don't know much about RI

TN:
Probably the best

TX:
Sacrifical lamb was anyone

UT:
Hatch was unstoppable in UT

VT:
Maybe only Douglas would be better

VA:
Webb is a good candidate

WA:
Best candidate

WV:
Capito Moore had a shot

WI:
Tommy Thompson

WY:
Thomas was unbeatable

That's all the races, anyone else?