which presidential candidate was weaker?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 10:20:09 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  which presidential candidate was weaker?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Poll
Question: ....
#1
mondale in 84
 
#2
dukakis in 88
 
#3
dole in 96
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 42

Author Topic: which presidential candidate was weaker?  (Read 7343 times)
dazzleman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,777
Political Matrix
E: 1.88, S: 1.59

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: October 25, 2006, 08:08:39 PM »

The 1988 Democratic ticket would have won had Lloyd Bentsen been running for president and Dukakis for veep.

True.

I also agree with that.

The problem is that Bentsen would never have gotten the nomination.  The primary voters were so far left that year that at one point, it looked as if Jesse Jackson might get the nomination, and the Democrats were staring at the prospect of a 50-state defeat.  Only DC voters would have been stupid enough to favor Jackson.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,874


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: October 25, 2006, 08:52:16 PM »

The 1988 Democratic ticket would have won had Lloyd Bentsen been running for president and Dukakis for veep.

True.

I also agree with that.

The problem is that Bentsen would never have gotten the nomination.  The primary voters were so far left that year that at one point, it looked as if Jesse Jackson might get the nomination, and the Democrats were staring at the prospect of a 50-state defeat.  Only DC voters would have been stupid enough to favor Jackson.

Part of the problem is that Jackson made Dukakis-- who otherwise would have been the liberal in the race, look more moderate. He also divided Al Gore's base in the South. In many ways, a similiar thing happened in 2004, when Howard Dean made Kerry look more moderate, when he would have been the liberal compared to Gephardt, Clark, or Edwards. The funny thing is that Kerry had all the baggage of a liberal voting record but- because of his equivocating on the war- without the benefits of major grassroots support.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 13 queries.