TN Sen: SUSA sez Ford leads Corker 48-45
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 12:43:14 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2006 Elections
  2006 Senatorial Election Polls
  TN Sen: SUSA sez Ford leads Corker 48-45
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: TN Sen: SUSA sez Ford leads Corker 48-45  (Read 2523 times)
Downwinder
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 313


Political Matrix
E: -5.42, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: September 13, 2006, 09:34:07 PM »

If Ford's momentum continues like this, he'll win by 20 points in November.  If this race is all I am expecting it to be, it should have books written about it.  Go Ford!!
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,502
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: September 13, 2006, 10:06:32 PM »

If Ford's momentum continues like this, he'll win by 20 points in November.  If this race is all I am expecting it to be, it should have books written about it.  Go Ford!!

Jeez 20 points? As much as I'd love that its not going to happen.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: September 14, 2006, 04:18:56 AM »

Interesting how three races almost nobody expected to be close (TN,VA,NJ) are all basically tossups now.

People did expect NJ to be close.

I said "almost" (and notice I said almost) because most of the people I talked to on here did not expect it to be close and you'll notice on any of the polls on here super majorites expect (or at least expected) Menendez to win.

But that's because most people here are Democrats, and dumb Democrats at that. They expect Democrats to win all races that are remotely competitive. The same goes for the average prediction maps. You have to exclude all the moron's predictions and look at what the reasonable people here predict.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,502
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: September 14, 2006, 05:50:00 AM »
« Edited: September 14, 2006, 06:00:18 AM by Eraserhead »

Interesting how three races almost nobody expected to be close (TN,VA,NJ) are all basically tossups now.

People did expect NJ to be close.

I said "almost" (and notice I said almost) because most of the people I talked to on here did not expect it to be close and you'll notice on any of the polls on here super majorites expect (or at least expected) Menendez to win.

But that's because most people here are Democrats, and dumb Democrats at that. They expect Democrats to win all races that are remotely competitive. The same goes for the average prediction maps. You have to exclude all the moron's predictions and look at what the reasonable people here predict.

Yeah but you also have to look at history and the history of who the state votes for and this state generally votes for Democrats especially in recent history. Ford is and or was the underdog for partly the same reason in TN (granted they have a popular Democratic Governor down there now).

Also I was just saying most people thought NJ wouldn't be close. I wasn't saying they were right or wrong to think that way, I'm just saying they did.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,684
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: September 14, 2006, 06:31:31 AM »

I agree the Dems aren't going to sweep all the competetive races, the best the Dems are going to do is net gain 3-4 seats. The state haven't voted for a Dem senator since 88 and Bredeson is much more conserv than Ford is.
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: September 14, 2006, 09:47:01 AM »

I agree the Dems aren't going to sweep all the competetive races, the best the Dems are going to do is net gain 3-4 seats. The state haven't voted for a Dem senator since 88 and Bredeson is much more conserv than Ford is.

Technically 1990 (Al Gore).
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,684
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: September 14, 2006, 09:59:01 AM »

Yea, but my other point remains they haven't sent a Dem senator in a long time . I think Ford can win but it is an uphill battle.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: September 14, 2006, 10:02:53 AM »
« Edited: September 14, 2006, 10:04:44 AM by polnut »

This race always had the potential to be close - huge warchest, name recognition (even if it is not always positive).

NJ was going to be close because the Dems have taken the place for granted of late... it might bite them on the arse.

I've moved both races into toss-up - with NJ leaning D and TN leaning R (purely based on demographics). Plus the UD in both races are over 10% which makes things harder.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: September 14, 2006, 11:12:37 AM »

Interesting how three races almost nobody expected to be close (TN,VA,NJ) are all basically tossups now.

People did expect NJ to be close.

I said "almost" (and notice I said almost) because most of the people I talked to on here did not expect it to be close and you'll notice on any of the polls on here super majorites expect (or at least expected) Menendez to win.

But that's because most people here are Democrats, and dumb Democrats at that. They expect Democrats to win all races that are remotely competitive. The same goes for the average prediction maps. You have to exclude all the moron's predictions and look at what the reasonable people here predict.

Yeah but you also have to look at history and the history of who the state votes for and this state generally votes for Democrats especially in recent history. Ford is and or was the underdog for partly the same reason in TN (granted they have a popular Democratic Governor down there now).

Also I was just saying most people thought NJ wouldn't be close. I wasn't saying they were right or wrong to think that way, I'm just saying they did.

I know all these things, my point is that the conventional wisdom should not be viewed as the same thing as the conventional bias of the forum. Wink
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,502
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: September 14, 2006, 06:05:36 PM »

Interesting how three races almost nobody expected to be close (TN,VA,NJ) are all basically tossups now.

People did expect NJ to be close.

I said "almost" (and notice I said almost) because most of the people I talked to on here did not expect it to be close and you'll notice on any of the polls on here super majorites expect (or at least expected) Menendez to win.

But that's because most people here are Democrats, and dumb Democrats at that. They expect Democrats to win all races that are remotely competitive. The same goes for the average prediction maps. You have to exclude all the moron's predictions and look at what the reasonable people here predict.

Yeah but you also have to look at history and the history of who the state votes for and this state generally votes for Democrats especially in recent history. Ford is and or was the underdog for partly the same reason in TN (granted they have a popular Democratic Governor down there now).

Also I was just saying most people thought NJ wouldn't be close. I wasn't saying they were right or wrong to think that way, I'm just saying they did.

I know all these things, my point is that the conventional wisdom should not be viewed as the same thing as the conventional bias of the forum. Wink

Well how do you know which I was referring to?
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: September 16, 2006, 12:25:14 PM »

Interesting how three races almost nobody expected to be close (TN,VA,NJ) are all basically tossups now.

People did expect NJ to be close.

I said "almost" (and notice I said almost) because most of the people I talked to on here did not expect it to be close and you'll notice on any of the polls on here super majorites expect (or at least expected) Menendez to win.

But that's because most people here are Democrats, and dumb Democrats at that. They expect Democrats to win all races that are remotely competitive. The same goes for the average prediction maps. You have to exclude all the moron's predictions and look at what the reasonable people here predict.

Yeah but you also have to look at history and the history of who the state votes for and this state generally votes for Democrats especially in recent history. Ford is and or was the underdog for partly the same reason in TN (granted they have a popular Democratic Governor down there now).

Also I was just saying most people thought NJ wouldn't be close. I wasn't saying they were right or wrong to think that way, I'm just saying they did.

I know all these things, my point is that the conventional wisdom should not be viewed as the same thing as the conventional bias of the forum. Wink

Well how do you know which I was referring to?

The one that is relevant of course. I guess I may have been wrong about that.
Logged
ottermax
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,799
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: -6.09

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: September 16, 2006, 01:42:18 PM »

I think that Ford will win this race by a close margin, but New Jersey will go Republican.
Logged
MarkWarner08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,812


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: September 16, 2006, 06:13:37 PM »

I think Ford and Kean will both lose. I love Ford but I just don't think he can overcome the RNC's smears. Kean will lose because of Menendez's $$$ and because eventually, the public will realized that the former Governor is not running for the Senate.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.225 seconds with 15 queries.