Another one for the files of The Silly Nanny State.
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 01:02:15 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Another one for the files of The Silly Nanny State.
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Another one for the files of The Silly Nanny State.  (Read 724 times)
David S
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,250


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 15, 2006, 03:11:34 PM »

People are too fat! Oops- no they're are too thin. Well anyway they're too...something and the government must enact legislation to fix it!

Pressure mounts for 'ban' on zero size models
15.09.06
Pressure was mounting today for a catwalk ban on super-skinny models.
On the eve of London Fashion Week the growing trend for "size-zero" models in the fashion industry is causing grave concern.
Experts say legislation is now needed to protect the health of the models and of the teenage girls and young women who are influenced by them.
They are urging London to follow the lead taken by Madrid — and likely to be adopted by Milan — of banning models below a certain size from the catwalks.
Under any ban, super-thin models such as Lily Cole would be barred. London Fashion Week, which begins next week, has so far refused to follow suit.
The new Spanish rules say models with a body mass index — a ratio of height to weight — below 18 are not allowed to appear at its shows.

Full article at http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23367018-details/Pressure+mounts+for+'ban'+on+zero+size+models/article.do


Libertarian recommendation: Tell the busy bodies to go screw themselves.

Logged
DanielX
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,126
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 15, 2006, 04:26:28 PM »

Was this a government decision? If so, than it's a bad idea.

If it was a private entity that made this decision, than I'd say 'good for them'.
Logged
Colin
ColinW
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,684
Papua New Guinea


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 15, 2006, 08:04:03 PM »

Was this a government decision? If so, than it's a bad idea.

If it was a private entity that made this decision, than I'd say 'good for them'.

I have to agree with Dan.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 16, 2006, 04:20:49 AM »

Some of us prefer the 'size zero' girl.  So what?
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 16, 2006, 05:06:42 PM »

Was this a government decision? If so, than it's a bad idea.

If it was a private entity that made this decision, than I'd say 'good for them'.

Tes and no, the Madrid government made the decision, but they also put put about one-third of the money that pay's for Madrid's fashion week.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 11 queries.