House Redistricting
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 09:42:13 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  House Redistricting
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Should it be the responsibility of an independent federal commission?
#1
Democrat - Yes
 
#2
Democrat - No
 
#3
Republican - Yes
 
#4
Republican - No
 
#5
Independent - Yes
 
#6
Independent - No
 
#7
Libertarian - Yes
 
#8
Libertarian - No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 25

Author Topic: House Redistricting  (Read 1468 times)
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 27, 2006, 07:17:50 PM »

It might shake things up a bit if nowt else Wink

Dave
Logged
ottermax
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,799
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: -6.09

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 27, 2006, 07:22:09 PM »

Of course we need an independent group deciding house districts, there is a similar bipartisan method done here in Washington, so I think every state should be that way.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 27, 2006, 07:22:28 PM »

Independent state commissions should run the process.
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,080
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 27, 2006, 07:22:47 PM »

Absolutely.  Actually, I don't mind if it's federal or state level - preferably the latter now I think about it, but I'd settle for either.  It might not stamp out partisan gerrymandering, but it would certainly be a step in the right direction.
Logged
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 27, 2006, 07:33:09 PM »

I framed the question in a federal context to address any recalcitrance on the part of the states in going about establishing their own independent state commissions

Dave
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 27, 2006, 07:42:06 PM »

Absolutlely it should be done by an independent federal commission.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,304
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 27, 2006, 07:55:21 PM »

Definitely.
Logged
Joel the Attention Whore
Joel
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 467


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 27, 2006, 07:56:17 PM »

Independent state commissions should run the process.
Logged
Deano963
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,866


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 27, 2006, 08:39:05 PM »

Yes.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,075
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 27, 2006, 09:02:19 PM »

Independent state commissions should run the process.

Ditto.
Logged
jerusalemcar5
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,731
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -8.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: September 27, 2006, 10:53:59 PM »

I would have it be federal-approved state commissions.
Logged
Downwinder
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 313


Political Matrix
E: -5.42, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: September 28, 2006, 01:49:20 AM »

I would like every state to have a system like Iowa's.  Redistricting absolutely must be taken out of the hands of partisan state legislatures.

http://www.centrists.org/pages/2004/07/7_buck_trust.html
Logged
DWPerry
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,674
Puerto Rico


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: September 28, 2006, 02:06:37 AM »

It should be done by a  truly Independent commission, districts should also be kept "concise and equal" meaning that all districts should have as close to the same amount of people as possible.
Logged
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: September 28, 2006, 09:33:50 AM »

Can anyone predict what a completely unbiased redistricting would mean politically?  Which party would have the most to gain from it? 
Logged
DWPerry
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,674
Puerto Rico


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: September 28, 2006, 10:27:54 AM »

Can anyone predict what a completely unbiased redistricting would mean politically?  Which party would have the most to gain from it? 

I could care less which party has the most to gain, it's not about party rights, it's about right & wrong. Hell, you may even see a few "3rd parties" winning seats!!! What a wonderful day that would be when the Republicratic Parties have competition!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Logged
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: September 28, 2006, 10:45:29 AM »

Can anyone predict what a completely unbiased redistricting would mean politically?  Which party would have the most to gain from it? 

I could care less which party has the most to gain, it's not about party rights, it's about right & wrong. Hell, you may even see a few "3rd parties" winning seats!!! What a wonderful day that would be when the Republicratic Parties have competition!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Why would it make third parties win more seats?  I just wondered what a map would throw up in certain areas and what the consequences would be for the parties.
Logged
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,828
Marshall Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: September 28, 2006, 04:53:33 PM »

It is unlikely that Congress would approve any sort of truly independent commission that would put the members seats at risk.
Logged
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: September 28, 2006, 05:09:20 PM »

Can anyone predict what a completely unbiased redistricting would mean politically?  Which party would have the most to gain from it? 

I could care less which party has the most to gain, it's not about party rights, it's about right & wrong. Hell, you may even see a few "3rd parties" winning seats!!! What a wonderful day that would be when the Republicratic Parties have competition!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

or the Demolicans Grin

Dave
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: September 29, 2006, 06:56:21 AM »

Can anyone predict what a completely unbiased redistricting would mean politically?  Which party would have the most to gain from it? 
Compared to the current map? Slight net Dem gain. Compared to the proportion of the two-party vote? Still slightly favoring the Republicans, due to strong Dem concentrations in inner cities.
Always assuming a close to 50-50 national split, of course.
Logged
DWPerry
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,674
Puerto Rico


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: September 29, 2006, 11:10:20 AM »

Can anyone predict what a completely unbiased redistricting would mean politically?  Which party would have the most to gain from it? 

I could care less which party has the most to gain, it's not about party rights, it's about right & wrong. Hell, you may even see a few "3rd parties" winning seats!!! What a wonderful day that would be when the Republicratic Parties have competition!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Why would it make third parties win more seats?  I just wondered what a map would throw up in certain areas and what the consequences would be for the parties.
On average 1/3 of voter's claim to be "Independent" and roughly 1/3 Republican & the other 1/3 Democrat. A truly unbiased District, assuming a three-way race, would statistically always be a dead-heat. Any variation for candidates stances could easily throw votes to an "Independent/3rd Party". Plus people as a whole are fed-up with the "2 choices" they have and want a change!
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.051 seconds with 13 queries.