Foley: A "Gay Man" and was Molested by Clergyman as Teen
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 01:37:12 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Foley: A "Gay Man" and was Molested by Clergyman as Teen
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Foley: A "Gay Man" and was Molested by Clergyman as Teen  (Read 2242 times)
Conan
conan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,140


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 03, 2006, 06:27:58 PM »

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/10/03/foley.scandal/index.html

Read and discuss
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 03, 2006, 06:29:27 PM »

Everyone blames the church for everything, this is all because the Catholic church has become to accepting, we should publically humilated the gay priests in the town square, then the church could become a church instead of a liberal secularist society
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 03, 2006, 06:30:45 PM »

then the church could become a church instead of a liberal secularist society

Congratulations.  That may have been the least sensical statement I've seen all day.
Logged
Conan
conan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,140


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 03, 2006, 06:32:15 PM »

Everyone blames the church for everything, this is all because the Catholic church has become to accepting, we should publically humilated the gay priests in the town square, then the church could become a church instead of a liberal secularist society
Like the church is so liberal. The Catholic Church is one of the most conservative churches. If they were less conservative and aloud there priests to marry then they wouldnt turn out to be this way. Not all of the child molesting priests are gay either.
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 03, 2006, 06:32:41 PM »

then the church could become a church instead of a liberal secularist society

Congratulations.  That may have been the least sensical statement I've seen all day.

The church has changed and not for the better
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,083
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 03, 2006, 06:33:13 PM »

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Wait, wtf?  Mark Foley is gay?!  Hold the phone.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 03, 2006, 06:34:32 PM »

then the church could become a church instead of a liberal secularist society

Congratulations.  That may have been the least sensical statement I've seen all day.

The church has changed and not for the better

OK, well, whatever.  Let me break down that statement instead of being lazy:

Are you actually implying that the Church ignored the gay priests because they wanted to be accepting of gays or paedophiles (the later of which is a mainstream liberal position now?) as opposed to covering their own collective asses, a phenomenon which knows no political boundaries?

What does any of that have to do with secularism?
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 03, 2006, 06:37:10 PM »

then the church could become a church instead of a liberal secularist society

Congratulations.  That may have been the least sensical statement I've seen all day.

The church has changed and not for the better

OK, well, whatever.  Let me break down that statement instead of being lazy:

Are you actually implying that the Church ignored the gay priests because they wanted to be accepting of gays or paedophiles (the later of which is a mainstream liberal position now?) as opposed to covering their own collective asses, a phenomenon which knows no political boundaries?

What does any of that have to do with secularism?

The church is trying to become secular and "PC" rather than be a true church, Vatican II really hurt the Catholic Church.  The final straw that made me not want to go to church was my parish allowing a Democratic councilmen as a Deacon.

Here's the church's problem, they've lost Jesus's message:

Jesus changed Mary Magdelin, he didn't say "keep being a prostitute because I must learn to accept your new alternate lifestyle."  He said, "stop that sh** or I'm not going to help you"

The church needs to do more of converting and saving than accepting
Logged
Conan
conan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,140


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 03, 2006, 06:42:08 PM »

then the church could become a church instead of a liberal secularist society

Congratulations.  That may have been the least sensical statement I've seen all day.

The church has changed and not for the better

OK, well, whatever.  Let me break down that statement instead of being lazy:

Are you actually implying that the Church ignored the gay priests because they wanted to be accepting of gays or paedophiles (the later of which is a mainstream liberal position now?) as opposed to covering their own collective asses, a phenomenon which knows no political boundaries?

What does any of that have to do with secularism?

The church is trying to become secular and "PC" rather than be a true church, Vatican II really hurt the Catholic Church.  The final straw that made me not want to go to church was my parish allowing a Democratic councilmen as a Deacon.

Here's the church's problem, they've lost Jesus's message:

Jesus changed Mary Magdelin, he didn't say "keep being a prostitute because I must learn to accept your new alternate lifestyle."  He said, "stop that sh** or I'm not going to help you"

The church needs to do more of converting and saving than accepting
You dont seem to know much about Mary Magdelin or christianity.
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 03, 2006, 06:43:43 PM »

then the church could become a church instead of a liberal secularist society

Congratulations.  That may have been the least sensical statement I've seen all day.

The church has changed and not for the better

OK, well, whatever.  Let me break down that statement instead of being lazy:

Are you actually implying that the Church ignored the gay priests because they wanted to be accepting of gays or paedophiles (the later of which is a mainstream liberal position now?) as opposed to covering their own collective asses, a phenomenon which knows no political boundaries?

What does any of that have to do with secularism?

The church is trying to become secular and "PC" rather than be a true church, Vatican II really hurt the Catholic Church.  The final straw that made me not want to go to church was my parish allowing a Democratic councilmen as a Deacon.

Here's the church's problem, they've lost Jesus's message:

Jesus changed Mary Magdelin, he didn't say "keep being a prostitute because I must learn to accept your new alternate lifestyle."  He said, "stop that sh** or I'm not going to help you"

The church needs to do more of converting and saving than accepting
You dont seem to know much about Mary Magdelin or christianity.

I'd like to know where I'm wrong, what I said is the actual teachings not the new PC church
Logged
Conan
conan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,140


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 03, 2006, 06:45:39 PM »

then the church could become a church instead of a liberal secularist society

Congratulations.  That may have been the least sensical statement I've seen all day.

The church has changed and not for the better

OK, well, whatever.  Let me break down that statement instead of being lazy:

Are you actually implying that the Church ignored the gay priests because they wanted to be accepting of gays or paedophiles (the later of which is a mainstream liberal position now?) as opposed to covering their own collective asses, a phenomenon which knows no political boundaries?

What does any of that have to do with secularism?

The church is trying to become secular and "PC" rather than be a true church, Vatican II really hurt the Catholic Church.  The final straw that made me not want to go to church was my parish allowing a Democratic councilmen as a Deacon.

Here's the church's problem, they've lost Jesus's message:

Jesus changed Mary Magdelin, he didn't say "keep being a prostitute because I must learn to accept your new alternate lifestyle."  He said, "stop that sh** or I'm not going to help you"

The church needs to do more of converting and saving than accepting
You dont seem to know much about Mary Magdelin or christianity.

I'd like to know where I'm wrong, what I said is the actual teachings not the new PC church
The Catholic church is very un PC. This is the church that says all gays will go to hell and that they are evil. Straight from the pope/former pope. This is the church who isnt cooperating with police in their crimes.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 03, 2006, 06:47:20 PM »

Take it outside, kids
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 03, 2006, 06:47:47 PM »

then the church could become a church instead of a liberal secularist society

Congratulations.  That may have been the least sensical statement I've seen all day.

The church has changed and not for the better

OK, well, whatever.  Let me break down that statement instead of being lazy:

Are you actually implying that the Church ignored the gay priests because they wanted to be accepting of gays or paedophiles (the later of which is a mainstream liberal position now?) as opposed to covering their own collective asses, a phenomenon which knows no political boundaries?

What does any of that have to do with secularism?

The church is trying to become secular and "PC" rather than be a true church, Vatican II really hurt the Catholic Church.  The final straw that made me not want to go to church was my parish allowing a Democratic councilmen as a Deacon.

Here's the church's problem, they've lost Jesus's message:

Jesus changed Mary Magdelin, he didn't say "keep being a prostitute because I must learn to accept your new alternate lifestyle."  He said, "stop that sh** or I'm not going to help you"

The church needs to do more of converting and saving than accepting
You dont seem to know much about Mary Magdelin or christianity.

I'd like to know where I'm wrong, what I said is the actual teachings not the new PC church
The Catholic church is very un PC. This is the church that says all gays will go to hell and that they are evil. Straight from the pope/former pope. This is the church who isnt cooperating with police in their crimes.

Umm.., you said I was wrong, where was I wrong?
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 03, 2006, 06:53:42 PM »

then the church could become a church instead of a liberal secularist society

Congratulations.  That may have been the least sensical statement I've seen all day.

The church has changed and not for the better

OK, well, whatever.  Let me break down that statement instead of being lazy:

Are you actually implying that the Church ignored the gay priests because they wanted to be accepting of gays or paedophiles (the later of which is a mainstream liberal position now?) as opposed to covering their own collective asses, a phenomenon which knows no political boundaries?

What does any of that have to do with secularism?

The church is trying to become secular and "PC" rather than be a true church, Vatican II really hurt the Catholic Church.  The final straw that made me not want to go to church was my parish allowing a Democratic councilmen as a Deacon.

Here's the church's problem, they've lost Jesus's message:

Jesus changed Mary Magdelin, he didn't say "keep being a prostitute because I must learn to accept your new alternate lifestyle."  He said, "stop that sh** or I'm not going to help you"

The church needs to do more of converting and saving than accepting
You dont seem to know much about...christianity.
Well then, it seems he's got all the requirements to be a mainstream Chrisitan.
Logged
Conan
conan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,140


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 03, 2006, 07:05:12 PM »

then the church could become a church instead of a liberal secularist society

Congratulations.  That may have been the least sensical statement I've seen all day.

The church has changed and not for the better

OK, well, whatever.  Let me break down that statement instead of being lazy:

Are you actually implying that the Church ignored the gay priests because they wanted to be accepting of gays or paedophiles (the later of which is a mainstream liberal position now?) as opposed to covering their own collective asses, a phenomenon which knows no political boundaries?

What does any of that have to do with secularism?

The church is trying to become secular and "PC" rather than be a true church, Vatican II really hurt the Catholic Church.  The final straw that made me not want to go to church was my parish allowing a Democratic councilmen as a Deacon.

Here's the church's problem, they've lost Jesus's message:

Jesus changed Mary Magdelin, he didn't say "keep being a prostitute because I must learn to accept your new alternate lifestyle."  He said, "stop that sh** or I'm not going to help you"

The church needs to do more of converting and saving than accepting
You dont seem to know much about Mary Magdelin or christianity.

I'd like to know where I'm wrong, what I said is the actual teachings not the new PC church
The Catholic church is very un PC. This is the church that says all gays will go to hell and that they are evil. Straight from the pope/former pope. This is the church who isnt cooperating with police in their crimes.

Umm.., you said I was wrong, where was I wrong?
You said the church was pc and it isnt. It will take way to long to give a lesson on the scriptures. Go ask a priest or reverend whats wrong with your statement.
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 03, 2006, 07:07:01 PM »

then the church could become a church instead of a liberal secularist society

Congratulations.  That may have been the least sensical statement I've seen all day.

The church has changed and not for the better

OK, well, whatever.  Let me break down that statement instead of being lazy:

Are you actually implying that the Church ignored the gay priests because they wanted to be accepting of gays or paedophiles (the later of which is a mainstream liberal position now?) as opposed to covering their own collective asses, a phenomenon which knows no political boundaries?

What does any of that have to do with secularism?

The church is trying to become secular and "PC" rather than be a true church, Vatican II really hurt the Catholic Church.  The final straw that made me not want to go to church was my parish allowing a Democratic councilmen as a Deacon.

Here's the church's problem, they've lost Jesus's message:

Jesus changed Mary Magdelin, he didn't say "keep being a prostitute because I must learn to accept your new alternate lifestyle."  He said, "stop that sh** or I'm not going to help you"

The church needs to do more of converting and saving than accepting
You dont seem to know much about Mary Magdelin or christianity.

I'd like to know where I'm wrong, what I said is the actual teachings not the new PC church
The Catholic church is very un PC. This is the church that says all gays will go to hell and that they are evil. Straight from the pope/former pope. This is the church who isnt cooperating with police in their crimes.

Umm.., you said I was wrong, where was I wrong?
You said the church was pc and it isnt. It will take way to long to give a lesson on the scriptures. Go ask a priest or reverend whats wrong with your statement.

Whether the church is PC or not is an opinion not a fact.  And what I said is exactly what the scriptures say.  Jesus did not say accept flaws, he said fix them
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 03, 2006, 07:07:18 PM »


Could you please kick someone in the face (theologically speaking) so we can move on?  Preferrably DownWithTheLeft (or conan if you have to).
Logged
Conan
conan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,140


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: October 03, 2006, 07:10:16 PM »


Could you please kick someone in the face (theologically speaking) so we can move on?  Preferrably DownWithTheLeft (or conan if you have to).
Sorry for taking up space on this topic for such nonsense.
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: October 03, 2006, 07:10:53 PM »


Could you please kick someone in the face (theologically speaking) so we can move on?  Preferrably DownWithTheLeft (or conan if you have to).
Sorry for taking up space on this topic for such nonsense.

Yes, next time if your going to call someone "wrong" know what your talking about
Logged
Conan
conan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,140


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: October 03, 2006, 07:13:50 PM »


Could you please kick someone in the face (theologically speaking) so we can move on?  Preferrably DownWithTheLeft (or conan if you have to).
Sorry for taking up space on this topic for such nonsense.

Yes, next time if your going to call someone "wrong" know what your talking about
You were wrong. Again this is not the place to discuss this. Go ask some clergyman as they have all the time in the world and know more then me on this subject.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: October 03, 2006, 10:26:24 PM »

If they were less conservative and aloud there priests to marry then they wouldnt turn out to be this way.

Uh...no.

 
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Exactly. A lot of them are married so please explain how allowing priests to be married would reduce this?
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: October 03, 2006, 10:27:51 PM »

This is the church that says all gays will go to hell and that they are evil. Straight from the pope/former pope.

Uh...wrong again and it would be funny if so many people didn't think it was true.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.067 seconds with 11 queries.