General midterm predictions
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 02:32:30 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  General midterm predictions
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: General midterm predictions  (Read 8583 times)
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,731


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 04, 2006, 03:38:30 PM »

I predict:

House: 220-215 Democrat
Senate: 50-50 Republican (Cheney breaks ties)
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,566
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 04, 2006, 03:40:49 PM »

House of Representatives

Democrats: 225
Republicans: 210

Senate

Democrats: 50
Republicans: 49
independent: 1 (Bernie Sanders)
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,706
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 04, 2006, 03:57:26 PM »

My guess right now is a narrow Democratic majority in the House and an even narrower GOP majority in the Senate.

But things do change and so will this prediction.
Logged
Silent Hunter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,320
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 05, 2006, 07:22:24 AM »

I haven't completed my seat-by-seat, but I'm predicting a Democrat takeover of the House. Not a big majority though.

GOP will retain the Senate.
Logged
Moooooo
nickshepDEM
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,909


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 05, 2006, 07:31:04 AM »

I have no idea about the house.

49-49-2 in the Senate.
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 05, 2006, 10:16:33 AM »

House:

D 220 R 215

Senate:

D 51 R 49 (counting Lieberman and Sanders as Dems since that's how they will caucus)
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,681
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 05, 2006, 10:19:24 AM »

The electorial-vote predictor didn't update it with Reuters, McCaskill is behind it is a tied senate.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 05, 2006, 11:22:05 AM »

Hopefully the US Conservatives are as bad as the Austrian ones this year, when they lost 13 of their 79 seats last Sunday. It looks not bad for the Democrats to turn this thing around - but i make my final prediction the day before the election, but for now I´d say they take the House and it gets close with the Senate Wink
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,681
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 05, 2006, 11:42:27 AM »
« Edited: October 05, 2006, 12:16:53 PM by Quincy »

No, Gallup has put Talent ahead. It won't be a tied senate. Gallup: 50-44%. And in TN the race is tied, it isn't 49-49 tie. And Mason Dixon had it a 43% all tie so you can't predict to be a win for the dems at the present time.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,778


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 05, 2006, 01:25:22 PM »

I'm not really competent to judge the House but with the whole Foley thing erupting it seems to me that it should go Democrat. But I expect it to be closer than many people think.

On the senate it's really too early to predict yet, but if I had to guess right now I say Democrats take Tennessee, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Montana, giving the GOP control with 51 seats.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 05, 2006, 02:32:56 PM »

House: 218 R 217 D

Senate: 49 D 49 R 2 I
Logged
poughies
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 919
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 05, 2006, 05:28:16 PM »

HMMMM.........

House 222 Dems
          213 Republicans

Senate
I'm pretty sure each side with have 49 (including Lieberman and Sanders)...... I don't know though.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,681
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 05, 2006, 05:37:03 PM »

I don't think the republicans are going to lose both MO and TN I say they win at least one of them.
Logged
Flying Dog
Jtfdem
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,404
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 05, 2006, 06:02:18 PM »

I'll just post my predictions on the hot senate races...

RI:
Chafee 45%
Whitehouse 54%

CT:
Lieberman 47%
Lamont 44%
Shslen..whatever 8%

NJ:
Kean Jr 48%
Menendez 49%

MD:
Cardin 53%
Steele 45%

PA:
Casey Jr 54%
Santorum 46%

VA:
Allen 53%
Webb 47%

FL:
Nelson 49%
Harris 51%

MS:
Fleming 59%
Lott 39%

TN:
Ford Jr 49.7%
Corker 49.5%

OH:
Brown 52%
DeWine 48%

MI:
Stabenow 56%
Bouchard 43%

MN:
Kolbuchar 54%
Kennedy 43%

MO:
Talent 49.8%
McCaskill 49.5%

MT:
Tester 54%
Burns 45%


Just kiddin on FL, and MS was for harry

D:48 R:50 I:2
Logged
Soaring Eagle
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 611


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 05, 2006, 08:29:04 PM »

House:

Dems win a majority. I will not attempt to call the exact number of seats they gain because there are too many competitive races.

Senate:

Dems win PA, MT, OH, RI, MO, TN, and VA while keeping all of their seats.

Dem - 51
GOP - 48
Ind - 1
Logged
poughies
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 919
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 05, 2006, 08:49:07 PM »

U had me there with that mississippi and florida....
Logged
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 05, 2006, 09:17:33 PM »

Not in a position to make any predictions yet but I will. In fact, I'll attempt to predict IN-2, IN-8 and IN-9 county by county all in good time Smiley

Dave
Logged
mgrossbe
Rookie
**
Posts: 180


Political Matrix
E: -4.65, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: October 05, 2006, 09:33:01 PM »

Dave,

The thing i really did not like when i was looking at the redistricting of Indiana. Was that they put a sliver of Monroe in IN-04 that sliver is basically the city of elletsville which is basically the oppisite of bloomington.  If you are liberal you live in b-town conservative you live in elletsville its kinda like the moving of kokomo into the second district.
Logged
adam
Captain Vlad
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,922


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -5.04

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: October 05, 2006, 09:43:44 PM »

I too will just post some senate predictions. (bold indicates winners)

Rhode Island:
Lincoln Chafee (R) - 49.2%
Sheldon Whitehouse(D) - 49.5%

Connecticut:
Joe Lieberman (CFL) - 43.1%
Ned Lamont (D) - 43.7%
Alan Schlesinger (R) - 13.2%

New Jersey:
Bob Menendez (D) - 50.6%
Tom Kean Jr. (R) - 49.4%

Maryland:
Ben Cardin (D) - 54.7%
Michael Steele (R) - 45.3%

Pennsylvania:
Rick Santorum (R) - 42.4%
Bob Casey Jr. (D) - 57.6%

Virginia:
George Allen (R) - 49.1%
Jim Webb (D) - 49.9%

New York:
Hillary Clinton (D) - 56.9%
John Spencer (R) - 43.1%

Washington:
Maria Cantwell (D) - 49.1%
Mike McGavick(R) - 43.7%
Bruce Guthrie (L) - 7.2%

Tennesee:
Bob Corker (R) - 48.9%
Harold Ford Jr. (D) - 51.1%

Ohio:
Mike DeWine (R) - 46.6%
Sherrod Brown (D) - 53.4%

Missouri:
Jim Talent (R) - 49.9%
Claire McCaskill (D) - 50.1%

Montana:
Conrad Burns (R) - 43.8%
Jon Tester (D) - 56.2%
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: October 05, 2006, 09:46:24 PM »

Vlad,

There's a Green, Aaron Dixon, on the ballot, here, who might shave off a lot of anti-war folks.  Not a ton, but quite a few.

Beyond that...damn, generous tothe Republicans in New York a little? Wink
Logged
adam
Captain Vlad
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,922


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -5.04

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: October 05, 2006, 09:50:35 PM »

Vlad,

There's a Green, Aaron Dixon, on the ballot, here, who might shave off a lot of anti-war folks.  Not a ton, but quite a few.

Beyond that...damn, generous tothe Republicans in New York a little? Wink

Haha, Green Party...that's cute. Wink Seriously though, now that Guthrie will be in the debates and has actually done something honorable (or insane depending on your viewpoint) he'll be the third party candidate to watch. As liberal as Washington is...I don't see Dixon cracking 1%. Then again, you know the state better than I do...so you could probably call it better than I.

And yes, most of my NY predictions are sprinkled with a pinch of wishful thinking...but it never hurts to dream. Smiley
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,643
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: October 05, 2006, 09:50:49 PM »

And now I know not to listen to Vlad a lot for some of his picks. Roll Eyes
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: October 05, 2006, 09:52:02 PM »

Vlad,

There's a Green, Aaron Dixon, on the ballot, here, who might shave off a lot of anti-war folks.  Not a ton, but quite a few.

Beyond that...damn, generous tothe Republicans in New York a little? Wink

Haha, Green Party...that's cute. Wink Seriously though, now that Guthrie will be in the debates and has actually done something honorable (or insane depending on your viewpoint) he'll be the third party candidate to watch. As liberal as Washington is...I don't see Dixon cracking 1%. Then again, you know the state better than I do...so you could probably call it better than I.

And yes, most of my NY predictions are sprinkled with a pinch of wishful thinking...but it never hurts to dream. Smiley

Guthrie is going to steal a lot from Dixon, but I still can't imagine him not breaking 1%.

Guthrie being in the debate will make things VERY interesting, though.
Logged
adam
Captain Vlad
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,922


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -5.04

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: October 05, 2006, 10:08:30 PM »

Vlad,

There's a Green, Aaron Dixon, on the ballot, here, who might shave off a lot of anti-war folks.  Not a ton, but quite a few.

Beyond that...damn, generous tothe Republicans in New York a little? Wink

Haha, Green Party...that's cute. Wink Seriously though, now that Guthrie will be in the debates and has actually done something honorable (or insane depending on your viewpoint) he'll be the third party candidate to watch. As liberal as Washington is...I don't see Dixon cracking 1%. Then again, you know the state better than I do...so you could probably call it better than I.

And yes, most of my NY predictions are sprinkled with a pinch of wishful thinking...but it never hurts to dream. Smiley

Guthrie is going to steal a lot from Dixon, but I still can't imagine him not breaking 1%.

Guthrie being in the debate will make things VERY interesting, though.

Agreed. In fact I think that his presence in the debates could be the nail in McGavicks coffin. Seeing as how if he performs well, most of his support will come from fiscal conservatives rather than social liberals/libertarians (as is the nature of LP candidates).
Logged
Silent Hunter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,320
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: October 06, 2006, 06:26:45 AM »

At the maximum, the Democrats will get 51 (counting Lieberman and Saunders).
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.064 seconds with 11 queries.