The Latino Coalition announces Endorsements
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 05:05:34 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  The Latino Coalition announces Endorsements
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: The Latino Coalition announces Endorsements  (Read 4233 times)
MODU
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,024
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: October 05, 2006, 09:15:32 AM »


YOU ARE IN NO POSITION TO SAY THAT I HAVE AN ANGER PROBLEM!!!

Tongue

Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,770


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: October 05, 2006, 01:27:05 PM »


YOU ARE IN NO POSITION TO SAY THAT I HAVE AN ANGER PROBLEM!!!











Tongue

I'm glad to see you coping with it. Wink
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,405
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: October 05, 2006, 11:16:17 PM »
« Edited: October 05, 2006, 11:23:32 PM by Eraserhead »

Phil your signature proves you are a hack because it shows that you actually believe Santorum will win. That is like me coming on here and saying Pederson has a lock on Arizona.

Anyone with at least half of a brain believes Santorum has a better shot than Pederson and I'll be proven right on November 7th

Wrong. Neither one has anything remotely close to a reasonable chance. At least Pederson is the challanger to the seat though.


Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Find one post where I ever said anything about Pederson closing the gap and we'll talk.  It doesn't exist.  Also for the record, I'm pretty certain I've been involved in politics a lot longer then you. Enjoy the Fantasy Land where Rick Santorum has a shot.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,405
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: October 05, 2006, 11:24:48 PM »

Phil your signature proves you are a hack because it shows that you actually believe Santorum will win. That is like me coming on here and saying Pederson has a lock on Arizona.

Oh and wow suddenly you love Bob Casey (which we all know is a lie) and that proves you aren't a hack. Want an award? I like Lincoln Chafee and Chuck Hagel myself.

No one takes you seriously because you spin everything as you see fit. My god you once went on a thread with a poll that had Casey leading by ten points and said "I'm pleased Santorum has kept Casey under 50% in recent polls". Grow up kid. You are becoming an embarrassement to humanity.

We won't think you're cool just because you act mean, you know. Phil has his anger problems but he's a lot nicer than you (and not more hackish than most people).

I'm acting mean? Check the thread. I believe he attacked me first.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,611


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: October 06, 2006, 09:43:23 AM »

Wrong. Neither one has anything remotely close to a reasonable chance. At least Pederson is the challanger to the seat though.

Uh...ok, hack.


Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

How long could have you possibly been involved? You're only...what...nine years old?

I will enjoy my Fantasy land and I have plenty of company, too.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,405
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: October 06, 2006, 03:15:39 PM »
« Edited: October 06, 2006, 03:20:22 PM by Eraserhead »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Wow, what an impressive retort! Did your Special Education instructor teach you that today?

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.


I'm older then you and I'm glad to hear you will enjoy the fantasy land where you think Rick Santorum has a real shot at winning yet you feel you can call anyone out as a "hack" at the same time. That is only slightly ridiculous.
Logged
Conan
conan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,140


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: October 06, 2006, 03:31:31 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Wow, what an impressive retort! Did your Special Education instructor teach you that today?

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.


I'm older then you and I'm glad to hear you will enjoy the fantasy land where you think Rick Santorum has a real shot at winning yet you feel you can call anyone out as a "hack" at the same time. That is only slightly ridiculous.
The most Santorum can get at this point is 46% maybe.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,611


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: October 06, 2006, 09:23:51 PM »



Wow, what an impressive retort! Did your Special Education instructor teach you that today?

Simple response to a simple minded hack.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Really? That's a shame. By the way, the correct word you were looking for was "than." Apparently your older age is not proven in your intelligence.

 
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Plenty of other commentators and people that actually know things about both Casey and Santorum feel the same.
Logged
The Dowager Mod
texasgurl
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,972
United States


Political Matrix
E: -9.48, S: -8.57

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: October 06, 2006, 09:26:06 PM »

Looks like they just tossed darts at a wall with candidates pictures on it.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,405
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: October 06, 2006, 09:48:07 PM »
« Edited: October 06, 2006, 09:50:42 PM by Eraserhead »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Yeah they are generally called hardcore partisans, fools and/or Fox News contributors. People more or less like you.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,611


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: October 06, 2006, 09:55:40 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Yeah they are generally called hardcore partisans, fools and/or Fox News contributors. People more or less like you.

That's funny because you have never been able to prove that I am a hardcore partisan (I can name a Democrat that I'd vote for in an actual election in my state. Can you name a Republican?) or a fool (I've, thankfully, had two people defend me, saying that I am a fairly respected figure). I'm also certainly not a FOX news contributor since I don't even like FOX (I don't like their bias and I don't get enough news from them).


I've had enough of you now. I won anyway.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,405
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: October 06, 2006, 10:00:04 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Yeah they are generally called hardcore partisans, fools and/or Fox News contributors. People more or less like you.

That's funny because you have never been able to prove that I am a hardcore partisan (I can name a Democrat that I'd vote for in an actual election in my state. Can you name a Republican?) or a fool (I've, thankfully, had two people defend me, saying that I am a fairly respected figure). I'm also certainly not a FOX news contributor since I don't even like FOX (I don't like their bias and I don't get enough news from them).


I've had enough of you now. I won anyway.

Won what? The "no" prize?

Who is this Democrat you are voting for?
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,611


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: October 06, 2006, 10:09:40 PM »



Who is this Democrat you are voting for?

I'm not voting for a Dem this year but I would have two years ago. I am not voting for every Republican this year which dismisses the idea that I am a total hack.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,405
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: October 06, 2006, 10:12:55 PM »



Who is this Democrat you are voting for?

I'm not voting for a Dem this year but I would have two years ago. I am not voting for every Republican this year which dismisses the idea that I am a total hack.

I would vote for certain Republicans who ran in random past years too.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,611


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: October 06, 2006, 10:22:49 PM »



Who is this Democrat you are voting for?

I'm not voting for a Dem this year but I would have two years ago. I am not voting for every Republican this year which dismisses the idea that I am a total hack.

I would vote for certain Republicans who ran in random past years too.

Random past years? No, I gave you a specific year, name and office. It was the last major election year, too, so there was nothing random about it.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.051 seconds with 11 queries.