The Latino Coalition announces Endorsements

[Eraserhead]

I'm sure Latinos everywhere will be lining up to vote for Rick Santorum.

[Eraserhead]

I'm sure Latinos everywhere will be lining up to vote for Rick Santorum.

Actually, Santorum has a pretty good record with minorties. He is very involved in urban areas. I love when people make smart ass remarks when they don't know what they're talking about.

Really? Care to make a prediction on his share of the Lationo vote?

[Eraserhead]

I'm sure Latinos everywhere will be lining up to vote for Rick Santorum.

Actually, Santorum has a pretty good record with minorties. He is very involved in urban areas. I love when people make smart ass remarks when they don't know what they're talking about.

Really? Care to make a prediction on his share of the Lationo vote?

No, but I do think he'll do fairly well. Being the uninformed hack that you are, you had no idea of Santorum's involvement in urban areas amongst minorities. I'm just pointing out that your sarcastic remark was quite foolish.

You are a joke and the king of hacks with an absurd signature that proves it. All politicians claim involvement in "urban areas" but does he vote to help people in them? No. Santorum will be taking home about 20% of the Latino vote and he deserves nothing more.

Honestly I'm still laughing at idea of you calling anyone a hack. Good one.

[Eraserhead]

Phil your signature proves you are a hack because it shows that you actually believe Santorum will win. That is like me coming on here and saying Pederson has a lock on Arizona.

Oh and wow suddenly you love Bob Casey (which we all know is a lie) and that proves you aren't a hack. Want an award? I like Lincoln Chafee and Chuck Hagel myself.

No one takes you seriously because you spin everything as you see fit. My god you once went on a thread with a poll that had Casey leading by ten points and said "I'm pleased Santorum has kept Casey under 50% in recent polls". Grow up kid. You are becoming an embarrassement to humanity.

[Eraserhead]

Phil your signature proves you are a hack because it shows that you actually believe Santorum will win. That is like me coming on here and saying Pederson has a lock on Arizona.

Anyone with at least half of a brain believes Santorum has a better shot than Pederson and I'll be proven right on November 7th

Wrong. Neither one has anything remotely close to a reasonable chance. At least Pederson is the challanger to the seat though.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Find one post where I ever said anything about Pederson closing the gap and we'll talk.  It doesn't exist.  Also for the record, I'm pretty certain I've been involved in politics a lot longer then you. Enjoy the Fantasy Land where Rick Santorum has a shot.

[Eraserhead]

Phil your signature proves you are a hack because it shows that you actually believe Santorum will win. That is like me coming on here and saying Pederson has a lock on Arizona.

Oh and wow suddenly you love Bob Casey (which we all know is a lie) and that proves you aren't a hack. Want an award? I like Lincoln Chafee and Chuck Hagel myself.

No one takes you seriously because you spin everything as you see fit. My god you once went on a thread with a poll that had Casey leading by ten points and said "I'm pleased Santorum has kept Casey under 50% in recent polls". Grow up kid. You are becoming an embarrassement to humanity.

We won't think you're cool just because you act mean, you know. Phil has his anger problems but he's a lot nicer than you (and not more hackish than most people).

I'm acting mean? Check the thread. I believe he attacked me first.

[Eraserhead]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Wow, what an impressive retort! Did your Special Education instructor teach you that today?

You must be logged in to read this quote.

I'm older then you and I'm glad to hear you will enjoy the fantasy land where you think Rick Santorum has a real shot at winning yet you feel you can call anyone out as a "hack" at the same time. That is only slightly ridiculous.

[Eraserhead]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Yeah they are generally called hardcore partisans, fools and/or Fox News contributors. People more or less like you.

[Eraserhead]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Yeah they are generally called hardcore partisans, fools and/or Fox News contributors. People more or less like you.

That's funny because you have never been able to prove that I am a hardcore partisan (I can name a Democrat that I'd vote for in an actual election in my state. Can you name a Republican?) or a fool (I've, thankfully, had two people defend me, saying that I am a fairly respected figure). I'm also certainly not a FOX news contributor since I don't even like FOX (I don't like their bias and I don't get enough news from them).


I've had enough of you now. I won anyway.

Won what? The "no" prize?

Who is this Democrat you are voting for?

[Eraserhead]

Who is this Democrat you are voting for?

I'm not voting for a Dem this year but I would have two years ago. I am not voting for every Republican this year which dismisses the idea that I am a total hack.

I would vote for certain Republicans who ran in random past years too.