Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
May 20, 2013, 02:52:22 pm
News:
Cast your ballot in the 2012 Mock Election!
Atlas Forum
Election Archive
2006 Elections
2006 Senatorial Election Polls
Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
2
3
Author
Topic: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen) (Read 26741 times)
poughies
YaBB God
Posts: 928
Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
on:
October 09, 2006, 11:01:05 am »
Pennsylvania: Senator Rick Santorum (R) now trails 50% to 37% in the latest Rasmussen Reports survey. When leaners are added in, Bob Casey, Jr. (D) is ahead 52%to 39%. Data and Article Coming Later. Over the summer, Santorum was gaining ground, but his momentum has stopped. He had closed the gap to eight points by late summer, but trailed by ten in our last poll. When this data is released to the public, we will shift our ranking of the race from "Leans Democrat" to "Democrat" in our Senate Balance of Power summary. This once again confirms Santorum's status as the nation's most vulnerable incumbent. No Democratic incumbents are trailing at this time and no other campaign involving a Republican incumbent is rated weaker than "Leans Democrat."
Logged
adam
Captain Vlad
YaBB God
Posts: 5029
Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -5.04
Re: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
Reply #1 on:
October 09, 2006, 11:21:43 am »
Looks like this is the end of Senator Dog Sex. Good riddance.
Logged
Quote from: Joe Republic on March 27, 2007, 06:00:35 pm
This is merely a polite notice.
G -
I
-
U
- L - I - A - N - I
Thank you.
Buddha
tmcusa2
YaBB God
Posts: 1095
Political Matrix
E: -7.13, S: -7.18
Re: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
Reply #2 on:
October 09, 2006, 11:23:20 am »
I honestly don't know which of the two is worse.
No way would I ever vote for either of them.
Logged
help with posting:
http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=help;page=post#bbcref
If you are interested in languages check this out:
http://home.unilang.org/main/forum/index.php
So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
Posts: 68117
Re: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
Reply #3 on:
October 09, 2006, 12:10:36 pm »
Santorum doesn't even have a month left. He had the momentum and a chance for a comeback about a month ago, but not anymore. I have no doubt the Santorum Will Win Brigade will be here now saying he'll still pull off an amazing comeback, but that's been said for the past few months, and he even had his shot before, and blew it.
Quote from: Chinese Character Guy on October 09, 2006, 11:23:20 am
I honestly don't know which of the two is worse.
Then you're an idiot.
Logged
Frodo
YaBB God
Posts: 12631
Re: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
Reply #4 on:
October 09, 2006, 12:16:25 pm »
Quote from: poughies on October 09, 2006, 11:01:05 am
Pennsylvania: Senator Rick Santorum (R) now trails 50% to 37% in the latest Rasmussen Reports survey. When leaners are added in, Bob Casey, Jr. (D) is ahead 52%to 39%. Data and Article Coming Later. Over the summer, Santorum was gaining ground, but his momentum has stopped. He had closed the gap to eight points by late summer, but trailed by ten in our last poll. When this data is released to the public, we will shift our ranking of the race from "Leans Democrat" to "Democrat" in our Senate Balance of Power summary. This once again confirms Santorum's status as the nation's most vulnerable incumbent. No Democratic incumbents are trailing at this time and no other campaign involving a Republican incumbent is rated weaker than "Leans Democrat."
Link? This is great news, but I'd rather have a source so I can more easily believe it.
Logged
Summary of My Political Beliefs
RomneyGekko Situation Hairgel
Flyers2004
YaBB God
Posts: 10508
Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.87
Re: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
Reply #5 on:
October 09, 2006, 12:19:46 pm »
Quote from: Chinese Character Guy on October 09, 2006, 11:23:20 am
I honestly don't know which of the two is worse.
No way would I ever vote for either of them.
Casey isn't that great, but come on you're not serious? This is Rick Santorum "man on dog".
Logged
DOUCHEBAGGERY AT ITS FINEST!
poughies
YaBB God
Posts: 928
Re: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
Reply #6 on:
October 09, 2006, 12:25:48 pm »
Its in the premium section, but here is the link to real clear politics that has it listed:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/latestpolls/
Logged
12th Doctor
supersoulty
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 20864
Political Matrix
E: 1.38, S: -1.74
Re: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
Reply #7 on:
October 09, 2006, 12:32:14 pm »
The final result will be within 2% either way, you can quote me on that.
These polls don't reflect the reality of the situation.
1) Casey has no ground organization to speak of. Santorum has spent the last year and a half building one.
2) Casey
still
refuses to debate Santorum, and it is gonna generate possitive press.
In fact, tomorrow, Santorum is coming here to Erie for a Press Conference where he will be asked questions by a panel of three journalists... hmmm... wait you say, this sounds like a debate format... well, it is. That's because it was supposed to be a debate and Casey begged off at the last minute.
There will be two podiums on the stage... Santorum's... and the empty one that Casey was supposed to be standing at... I wonder what kinda press that is going to generate.
3) Casey's lead is soft, 20% of it is based on name recongnition alone.
4) Undecideds are gonna break solidly for Santorum, because if you haven't jumped on the Casey band wagon by now, you never will.
Logged
Click for Old Profile Pic
So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
Posts: 68117
Re: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
Reply #8 on:
October 09, 2006, 12:35:43 pm »
Quote from: Supersoulty on October 09, 2006, 12:32:14 pm
The final result will be within 2% either way, you can quote me on that.
These polls don't reflect the reality of the situation.
1) Casey has no ground organization to speak of. Santorum has spent the last year and a half building one.
2) Casey
still
refuses to debate Santorum, and it is gonna generate possitive press.
In fact, tomorrow, Santorum is coming here to Erie for a Press Conference where he will be asked questions by a panel of three journalists... hmmm... wait you say, this sounds like a debate format... well, it is. That's because it was supposed to be a debate and Casey begged off at the last minute.
There will be two podiums on the stage... Santorum's... and the empty one that Casey was supposed to be standing at... I wonder what kinda press that is going to generate.
3) Casey's lead is soft, 20% of it is based on name recongnition alone.
4) Undecideds are gonna break solidly for Santorum, because if you haven't jumped on the Casey band wagon by now, you never will.
Did Mark Kennedy tell you that?
Logged
Conan
conan
YaBB God
Posts: 3172
Re: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
Reply #9 on:
October 09, 2006, 12:37:54 pm »
Yea It is actually too bad that we played it safe with Casey. We could have had a more progressive dem and win.
Logged
So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
Posts: 68117
Re: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
Reply #10 on:
October 09, 2006, 12:39:12 pm »
Quote from: conan on October 09, 2006, 12:37:54 pm
Yea It is actually too bad that we played it safe with Casey. We could have had a more progressive dem and win.
There's a good chance Casey will be out of there and in the Governor's mansion in less than a term anyway, we should get someone better eventually.
Logged
12th Doctor
supersoulty
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 20864
Political Matrix
E: 1.38, S: -1.74
Re: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
Reply #11 on:
October 09, 2006, 12:43:42 pm »
Quote from: Red on October 09, 2006, 12:35:43 pm
Quote from: Supersoulty on October 09, 2006, 12:32:14 pm
The final result will be within 2% either way, you can quote me on that.
These polls don't reflect the reality of the situation.
1) Casey has no ground organization to speak of. Santorum has spent the last year and a half building one.
2) Casey
still
refuses to debate Santorum, and it is gonna generate possitive press.
In fact, tomorrow, Santorum is coming here to Erie for a Press Conference where he will be asked questions by a panel of three journalists... hmmm... wait you say, this sounds like a debate format... well, it is. That's because it was supposed to be a debate and Casey begged off at the last minute.
There will be two podiums on the stage... Santorum's... and the empty one that Casey was supposed to be standing at... I wonder what kinda press that is going to generate.
3) Casey's lead is soft, 20% of it is based on name recongnition alone.
4) Undecideds are gonna break solidly for Santorum, because if you haven't jumped on the Casey band wagon by now, you never will.
Did Mark Kennedy tell you that?
I was acctually just about to change that seat to a Dem Lean
Logged
Click for Old Profile Pic
ucscgaldamez
Sr. Member
Posts: 374
Re: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
Reply #12 on:
October 09, 2006, 12:47:41 pm »
I don't think Santorum can pull this off. Not even with a well-organized GOTV effort. If a GOTV effort did not pull an upset for Bush in PA., it will not do so for Santorum either.
«
Last Edit: October 09, 2006, 12:52:23 pm by ucscgaldamez
»
Logged
Ben.
Ben
YaBB God
Posts: 4223
Re: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
Reply #13 on:
October 09, 2006, 12:58:39 pm »
It'll be closer than the polls show on the day... that said, it's Casey race to lose as of today.
Casey has a strong Dem organisation in the east and west of the state and Rendell very likley re-election (potentially by a wide margin) should provide a clear win for Casey in November... but we'll see.
Logged
.Britain’s Mayor.
12th Doctor
supersoulty
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 20864
Political Matrix
E: 1.38, S: -1.74
Re: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
Reply #14 on:
October 09, 2006, 01:51:39 pm »
Quote from: Ben. on October 09, 2006, 12:58:39 pm
It'll be closer than the polls show on the day... that said, it's Casey race to lose as of today.
Casey has a strong Dem organisation in the east and west of the state and Rendell very likley re-election (potentially by a wide margin) should provide a clear win for Casey in November... but we'll see.
Interesting theory... however, I think that no real race for the governorship, lack of organization and the fact that Rendell doesn't support Casey will mean that Democrat turnout will probably be lower, as more people are going to see the race as a run away.
Logged
Click for Old Profile Pic
So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
Posts: 68117
Re: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
Reply #15 on:
October 09, 2006, 02:17:18 pm »
Quote from: Supersoulty on October 09, 2006, 12:43:42 pm
Quote from: Red on October 09, 2006, 12:35:43 pm
Quote from: Supersoulty on October 09, 2006, 12:32:14 pm
The final result will be within 2% either way, you can quote me on that.
These polls don't reflect the reality of the situation.
1) Casey has no ground organization to speak of. Santorum has spent the last year and a half building one.
2) Casey
still
refuses to debate Santorum, and it is gonna generate possitive press.
In fact, tomorrow, Santorum is coming here to Erie for a Press Conference where he will be asked questions by a panel of three journalists... hmmm... wait you say, this sounds like a debate format... well, it is. That's because it was supposed to be a debate and Casey begged off at the last minute.
There will be two podiums on the stage... Santorum's... and the empty one that Casey was supposed to be standing at... I wonder what kinda press that is going to generate.
3) Casey's lead is soft, 20% of it is based on name recongnition alone.
4) Undecideds are gonna break solidly for Santorum, because if you haven't jumped on the Casey band wagon by now, you never will.
Did Mark Kennedy tell you that?
I was acctually just about to change that seat to a Dem Lean
Good, but I tend to trust myself over anyone who actually thought Kennedy was at least a half-decent candidate.
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
YaBB God
Posts: 18852
Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35
Re: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
Reply #16 on:
October 09, 2006, 02:27:25 pm »
Quote from: conan on October 09, 2006, 12:37:54 pm
Yea It is actually too bad that we played it safe with Casey. We could have had a more progressive dem and win.
No, you really couldn't have. Casey's support among those in the middle is based on positive name recognition, something a Hoeffel or Hafer wouldn't have had.
Logged
© Tweed the Younger
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
Posts: 34279
Re: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
Reply #17 on:
October 09, 2006, 02:38:28 pm »
Time for the GOP to cut the funding here and instead try to save DeWine, Allen, Corker, and Talent.
Logged
"If the Constitution means anything, it surely means that the president does not have unreviewable authority to summarily execute any American whom he concludes is an enemy of the state"
registered somewhere in Georgia AFE
Conan
conan
YaBB God
Posts: 3172
Re: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
Reply #18 on:
October 09, 2006, 02:44:02 pm »
Quote from: Jake on October 09, 2006, 02:27:25 pm
Quote from: conan on October 09, 2006, 12:37:54 pm
Yea It is actually too bad that we played it safe with Casey. We could have had a more progressive dem and win.
No, you really couldn't have. Casey's support among those in the middle is based on positive name recognition, something a Hoeffel or Hafer wouldn't have had.
The national climate and the huge dislike of Santorum would have given Ted Kennedy a Senate Seat here.
Logged
12th Doctor
supersoulty
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 20864
Political Matrix
E: 1.38, S: -1.74
Re: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
Reply #19 on:
October 09, 2006, 02:45:49 pm »
Quote from: Red on October 09, 2006, 02:17:18 pm
Quote from: Supersoulty on October 09, 2006, 12:43:42 pm
Quote from: Red on October 09, 2006, 12:35:43 pm
Quote from: Supersoulty on October 09, 2006, 12:32:14 pm
The final result will be within 2% either way, you can quote me on that.
These polls don't reflect the reality of the situation.
1) Casey has no ground organization to speak of. Santorum has spent the last year and a half building one.
2) Casey
still
refuses to debate Santorum, and it is gonna generate possitive press.
In fact, tomorrow, Santorum is coming here to Erie for a Press Conference where he will be asked questions by a panel of three journalists... hmmm... wait you say, this sounds like a debate format... well, it is. That's because it was supposed to be a debate and Casey begged off at the last minute.
There will be two podiums on the stage... Santorum's... and the empty one that Casey was supposed to be standing at... I wonder what kinda press that is going to generate.
3) Casey's lead is soft, 20% of it is based on name recongnition alone.
4) Undecideds are gonna break solidly for Santorum, because if you haven't jumped on the Casey band wagon by now, you never will.
Did Mark Kennedy tell you that?
I was acctually just about to change that seat to a Dem Lean
Good, but I tend to trust myself over anyone who actually thought Kennedy was at least a half-decent candidate.
And I tend to trust the judgement of someone who is in state over that of someone who is out of state... that being said, you have the right-up on me in Minnesota and I woudl trust that you would believe the same for me in PA
Logged
Click for Old Profile Pic
OC
olawakandi
YaBB God
Posts: 8398
Re: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
Reply #20 on:
October 09, 2006, 03:50:40 pm »
There is another poll that disputes this, there is poll just released that have it a 5 pt lead.
Logged
poughies
YaBB God
Posts: 928
Re: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
Reply #21 on:
October 09, 2006, 03:56:38 pm »
ANOTHER F-ING AWFUL COLLEGE POLL! Another poll that contradicts the findings of 4 other polls. The other poll is completly garbage and I don't believe it....
Logged
OC
olawakandi
YaBB God
Posts: 8398
Re: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
Reply #22 on:
October 09, 2006, 03:57:24 pm »
They have Rendell up by 21 so I don't see how you don't believe it.
«
Last Edit: October 09, 2006, 04:00:08 pm by Quincy
»
Logged
poughies
YaBB God
Posts: 928
Re: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
Reply #23 on:
October 09, 2006, 04:03:34 pm »
Just because that number matches doesn't make this one better. As for 2004, there last poll was 2 weeks before the election, so that could be linked to nailing the result with 2 weeks to go, who knows whether they would have had it right if they polled with a week to go. The governor's race matches other polls (with perhaps too much to Rendell), but the fact remains that this poll does not match a CLEAR trend towards Casey. U give me two other polls like that and maybe I'll believe it. Until then, I'll take Rasmussen.
Logged
OC
olawakandi
YaBB God
Posts: 8398
Re: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
Reply #24 on:
October 09, 2006, 04:07:55 pm »
Franklin Marshall 7 pts, SV 10 pts and Mason Dixon 9 pts. I think it is on track with these polls. I think the lead may not be 5 but it is around 10 pts. I don't think it is this big.
«
Last Edit: October 09, 2006, 04:12:26 pm by Quincy
»
Logged
Pages:
[
1
]
2
3
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...