Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 10:36:12 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2006 Elections
  2006 Senatorial Election Polls
  Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)  (Read 31975 times)
Conan
conan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,140
« on: October 09, 2006, 12:37:54 PM »
Yea It is actually too bad that we played it safe with Casey. We could have had a more progressive dem and win.
Logged
Conan
conan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,140
« Reply #1 on: October 09, 2006, 02:44:02 PM »
Quote from: Jake on October 09, 2006, 02:27:25 PM
Quote from: conan on October 09, 2006, 12:37:54 PM
Yea It is actually too bad that we played it safe with Casey. We could have had a more progressive dem and win.

No, you really couldn't have. Casey's support among those in the middle is based on positive name recognition, something a Hoeffel or Hafer wouldn't have had.
The national climate and the huge dislike of Santorum would have given Ted Kennedy a Senate Seat here.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.015 seconds with 10 queries.