November surprise.
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 08:59:42 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  November surprise.		 « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Poll
Question: Most likely surprise.
#1
Santorum wins in Pennsylvania.		  
#2
Swann wins in Pennsylvania.		  
#3
Schwarzenegger loses in California.		  
#4
Carter wins in Nevada.		  
#5
Lamont win in Connecticut.		  
#6
Schlesinger wins in Connecticut.		  
#7
Pederson wins in Arizona.		  
#8
Chafee wins in Rhode Island.		  
#9
Harris wins in Florida.		  
#10
Pigs will fly.		  
#11
Other answer / write in		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 66

Author Topic: November surprise.  (Read 2403 times)
°Leprechaun
tmcusa2
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,184
Uruguay


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 17, 2006, 09:18:20 AM »
11 day poll
Logged
MODU
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,023
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 17, 2006, 09:22:54 AM »


My money is on Swann.  Smiley
Logged
Joe Biden 2020
BushOklahoma
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,921
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.77, S: 3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 17, 2006, 02:16:40 PM »
Pigs will fly.  Next would be Lamont winning Connecticut.
Logged
○∙◄☻„tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,751


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 17, 2006, 02:18:30 PM »
I suppose it's not the most likely, but I had to vote option 3 anyways.
Logged
GOP = Terrorists
Progress
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,667


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 17, 2006, 03:02:11 PM »
Lamont winning in Conn.
Logged
Boris
boris78
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,098
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -1.55, S: -4.52

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 17, 2006, 03:03:11 PM »
Pigs will fly, though Chaffee and Lamont have the best chances.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 17, 2006, 04:35:12 PM »
Lamont and Chafee really are the only events here that have any real chance of happening.
Logged
Mr. Paleoconservative
Reagan Raider
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 560
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.29, S: 5.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 17, 2006, 04:41:55 PM »
Chafee's winning in Rhode Island is most likely.
Logged
adam
Captain Vlad
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,922


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -5.04

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 17, 2006, 04:54:00 PM »
Write-In: Kinky Friedman wins in Texas. Smiley
Logged
Colin
ColinW
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,684
Papua New Guinea


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 17, 2006, 04:57:09 PM »
Probably a Chafee win in Rhode Island.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 17, 2006, 04:59:01 PM »
Quote from: Reagan Raider on October 17, 2006, 04:41:55 PM
Chafee's winning in Rhode Island is most likely.

^^^^^^^
Logged
Bdub
Brandon W
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,116
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 17, 2006, 09:14:05 PM »
Chafee or Lamont winning are the most likely.
Logged
bullmoose88
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,515


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 17, 2006, 10:10:43 PM »
Logged
MaC
Milk_and_cereal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 17, 2006, 10:17:13 PM »
write-in: Bob Smither for TX-22 Smiley
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 17, 2006, 11:49:30 PM »
Pederson has a shot if the Democratic wave is big enough.

I agree that Lamont also has a chance if Republicans start coming home to Schlesinger. It's hard to believe the GOP nominee is actually going to get only 4 percent of the vote when all is said and done, but I guess we'll find out. (In fact, it raises the interesting question of when the last time a major party nominee did that poorly in a Senate race would've been; obviously you've got the unopposed candidates, but I'm talking about a candidate who actually won a major party primary and ended up with less than 5 percent of the vote on election day).
Logged
Cubby
Pim Fortuyn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,067
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -3.74, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 18, 2006, 02:45:35 AM »
Quote from: Senator Brandon W on October 17, 2006, 09:14:05 PM
Chafee or Lamont winning are the most likely.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 20, 2006, 10:07:46 AM »
I love how Lamont winning is the second most popular choice (only down by one for a tie in the top spot as I post this) when Lamont has consistently been trailing by double digits for awhile.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: October 20, 2006, 11:44:20 AM »
Quote from: Keystone Phil on October 20, 2006, 10:07:46 AM
I love how Lamont winning is the second most popular choice (only down by one for a tie in the top spot as I post this) when Lamont has consistently been trailing by double digits for awhile.

Chafee has been trailing consistently as well, though by slightly less.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,050
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: October 20, 2006, 11:58:04 AM »
Quote from: Keystone Phil on October 20, 2006, 10:07:46 AM
I love how Lamont winning is the second most popular choice (only down by one for a tie in the top spot as I post this) when Lamont has consistently been trailing by double digits for awhile.

As has Santorum.
Logged
MODU
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,023
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: October 20, 2006, 12:28:32 PM »
Quote from: Red on October 20, 2006, 11:58:04 AM
Quote from: Keystone Phil on October 20, 2006, 10:07:46 AM
I love how Lamont winning is the second most popular choice (only down by one for a tie in the top spot as I post this) when Lamont has consistently been trailing by double digits for awhile.

As has Santorum.

OMG . . . Santorum is going to win!!!  Tongue
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,050
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: October 20, 2006, 12:30:55 PM »
Quote from: MODU on October 20, 2006, 12:28:32 PM
Quote from: Red on October 20, 2006, 11:58:04 AM
Quote from: Keystone Phil on October 20, 2006, 10:07:46 AM
I love how Lamont winning is the second most popular choice (only down by one for a tie in the top spot as I post this) when Lamont has consistently been trailing by double digits for awhile.

As has Santorum.

OMG . . . Santorum is going to win!!!  Tongue

Phil thinks so.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: October 20, 2006, 02:32:55 PM »
Quote from: opebo on October 20, 2006, 11:44:20 AM
Quote from: Keystone Phil on October 20, 2006, 10:07:46 AM
I love how Lamont winning is the second most popular choice (only down by one for a tie in the top spot as I post this) when Lamont has consistently been trailing by double digits for awhile.

Chafee has been trailing consistently as well, though by slightly less.

I thought he'd lose awhile ago so I don't get your point.


Quote from: Red on October 20, 2006, 11:58:04 AM
Quote from: Keystone Phil on October 20, 2006, 10:07:46 AM
I love how Lamont winning is the second most popular choice (only down by one for a tie in the top spot as I post this) when Lamont has consistently been trailing by double digits for awhile.

As has Santorum.

Exactly my point except Lamont is doing slightly worse in the polls.



You bet I do. I enjoy being smarter than you.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,050
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: October 20, 2006, 08:16:36 PM »
So it's pretty ridiculous to say Santorum will win while Lamont has no chance.

And no, I'm not expecting Lamont to win.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: October 20, 2006, 08:23:54 PM »
If Santorum could win, why did the RSCC give up on him? (along with DeWine and Burns)
Logged
○∙◄☻„tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,751


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: October 21, 2006, 02:17:03 AM »

That's option 10.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.063 seconds with 13 queries.