November surprise. (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 10:43:33 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  November surprise. (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Most likely surprise.
#1
Santorum wins in Pennsylvania.		  
#2
Swann wins in Pennsylvania.		  
#3
Schwarzenegger loses in California.		  
#4
Carter wins in Nevada.		  
#5
Lamont win in Connecticut.		  
#6
Schlesinger wins in Connecticut.		  
#7
Pederson wins in Arizona.		  
#8
Chafee wins in Rhode Island.		  
#9
Harris wins in Florida.		  
#10
Pigs will fly.		  
#11
Other answer / write in		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 66

Author Topic: November surprise.  (Read 2407 times)
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607
« on: October 20, 2006, 10:07:46 AM »
I love how Lamont winning is the second most popular choice (only down by one for a tie in the top spot as I post this) when Lamont has consistently been trailing by double digits for awhile.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607
« Reply #1 on: October 20, 2006, 02:32:55 PM »
Quote from: opebo on October 20, 2006, 11:44:20 AM
Quote from: Keystone Phil on October 20, 2006, 10:07:46 AM
I love how Lamont winning is the second most popular choice (only down by one for a tie in the top spot as I post this) when Lamont has consistently been trailing by double digits for awhile.

Chafee has been trailing consistently as well, though by slightly less.

I thought he'd lose awhile ago so I don't get your point.


Quote from: Red on October 20, 2006, 11:58:04 AM
Quote from: Keystone Phil on October 20, 2006, 10:07:46 AM
I love how Lamont winning is the second most popular choice (only down by one for a tie in the top spot as I post this) when Lamont has consistently been trailing by double digits for awhile.

As has Santorum.

Exactly my point except Lamont is doing slightly worse in the polls.



You bet I do. I enjoy being smarter than you.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607
« Reply #2 on: October 23, 2006, 04:55:42 AM »
Quote from: © Boss Tweed on October 20, 2006, 08:23:54 PM
If Santorum could win, why did the RSCC give up on him? (along with DeWine and Burns)

Why did the NRCC not give him a single contribution in 1990? He obviously didn't have a chance.


Quote from: Red on October 20, 2006, 08:16:36 PM
So it's pretty ridiculous to say Santorum will win while Lamont has no chance.


Santorum has a far better record of coming from behind to win a campaign. Lamont has a proven record of being a weak hack.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 13 queries.