Opebo (Associate Justice) Confirmation Hearing
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 12:00:53 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Opebo (Associate Justice) Confirmation Hearing
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3
Author Topic: Opebo (Associate Justice) Confirmation Hearing  (Read 5167 times)
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: October 20, 2006, 05:43:21 AM »

I strongly urge the Senate to confirm this outstanding nominee.

As do I.

Likewise.  (seriously)
Logged
Јas
Jas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,705
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: October 20, 2006, 07:01:53 AM »

I thank the nominee for his responses, and hope he will not object to one or two quick follow-ups.

3. Does the President have the constitutional authority to fire the Game Moderator?

I have no problem with current precedent on this issue.

The only precedent on this matter, to my knowledge, was President Ebowed',s recent order firing the previous GM, EarlAW. No action arose from this. Just to clarify, is it your belief that should Earl have taken an action to the Court challenging the President's authority to fire him that you would have upheld the Presidential ruling?

4. How strictly should the prohibition on campaigning in the voting booth be enforced?

It should be enforced, but the details of implementation of any legislated policy are the purveiw of the executive, not the judicial branch.

Granted, but the Court has had to decide in times past on the validity of votes after an executive decision was made regarding campaigning. If I may, could I ask your opinions on the cases of ILP v DoFA and TD v. DoFA.

Thank you.
Logged
Јas
Jas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,705
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: October 20, 2006, 07:14:51 AM »

The only precedent on this matter, to my knowledge, was President Ebowed',s recent order firing the previous GM, EarlAW.

It could be argued that the authority to do this, and hence the now-established precedent, was implied in the ruling Sam Spade vs. Ebowed as it gave the President authority to install a GM despite the lack of a constitutional requirement regarding the GM and how the position is filled.

I would tend to agree (I was not by asking the question the removal of Earl),  but the purpose of the question was, as with certain previous questions I've put to nominees, not so much to find a definitive answer, but to establish that the nominee will provide evidence of detached analysis of the question, i.e. evidence of suitability for the post sought.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: October 21, 2006, 01:58:30 AM »

I thank the nominee for his responses, and hope he will not object to one or two quick follow-ups.

3. Does the President have the constitutional authority to fire the Game Moderator?

I have no problem with current precedent on this issue.

The only precedent on this matter, to my knowledge, was President Ebowed',s recent order firing the previous GM, EarlAW. No action arose from this. Just to clarify, is it your belief that should Earl have taken an action to the Court challenging the President's authority to fire him that you would have upheld the Presidential ruling?

Yes.  I think the fact that the position is a presidential appointment, not subject to confirmation by the Senate implies that the GM serves at the president's discretion.

4. How strictly should the prohibition on campaigning in the voting booth be enforced?

It should be enforced, but the details of implementation of any legislated policy are the purveiw of the executive, not the judicial branch.

Granted, but the Court has had to decide in times past on the validity of votes after an executive decision was made regarding campaigning. If I may, could I ask your opinions on the cases of ILP v DoFA and TD v. DoFA.

Thank you.
[/quote]

In both cases I would have decided in favour of the Department of Forum Affairs.  Both ballots contained what I would consider to be campaigning.
Logged
Јas
Jas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,705
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: October 21, 2006, 06:17:26 AM »

I thank the nominee for his repsonses. I have no further questions.
Logged
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: October 21, 2006, 08:16:42 PM »

I hereby open the vote on the nominee. Please vote Aye, Nay or Abstain

'Hawk'
Logged
True Democrat
true democrat
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,368
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: -2.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: October 21, 2006, 08:34:49 PM »

I urge my Senators to vote in favor of this nominee.  Mix up the game a little.
Logged
Dr. Cynic
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,424
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.11, S: -6.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: October 22, 2006, 12:43:37 AM »

Well my fellow Senators, I think in interest to the game:

Aye
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: October 22, 2006, 11:51:07 AM »

Aye
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,618
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: October 22, 2006, 08:30:11 PM »

Nay, I don't feel like screwing up sh**t and voting for a nominee that knows nothing about Atlasia.
Logged
Јas
Jas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,705
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: October 23, 2006, 11:27:40 AM »

Aye

While I have my concerns, had any other nominee answered my questions in the same manner I would likely have voted to confirm. I hope, should he be confirmed, that he take the role seriously and apply the law in a fair and impartial manner.
Logged
WMS
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,562


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: October 23, 2006, 03:56:40 PM »

Hell, given the opportunity, the nominee would be doing his damdest to strike anything he considers "prudery" down because it runs counter to his subjective preferences

We can't have judicial activism on the bench, in any shape or form

'Hawk'



Could the Nominee please answer Senator Hawk? His concerns are similar to mine.

I regret any inconvenience to the Senators, but I did not see a question in Senator Hawks commentary.

Ah, perhaps I should have clarified. Not that you need to answer the question now that voting has begun, but: Are you willing to avoid judicial activism - which FTR can come from any quarter Wink - on the Court?
Logged
jerusalemcar5
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,731
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -8.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: October 23, 2006, 08:38:01 PM »

Aye.
Logged
Bdub
Brandon W
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,116
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: October 24, 2006, 10:27:28 AM »

Aye.

I have decided to vote in favor of the nominee.  Its more to keep people such as Opebo active in Atlasia.
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,618
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: October 24, 2006, 12:30:46 PM »

Aye.

I have decided to vote in favor of the nominee.  Its more to keep people such as Opebo active in Atlasia.

Except he isn't active, somebody tells him to come out and vote and he does. You really never see him around any other time.
Logged
Bdub
Brandon W
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,116
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: October 24, 2006, 12:52:07 PM »

Aye.

I have decided to vote in favor of the nominee.  Its more to keep people such as Opebo active in Atlasia.

Except he isn't active, somebody tells him to come out and vote and he does. You really never see him around any other time.
Thats the thing.  I hope by giving Opebo a government position, he might possibly pay attention to fantasy politics more and overall be more involved.  I know thats not always the case but Im optomistic.
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,618
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: October 24, 2006, 02:05:20 PM »

Aye.

I have decided to vote in favor of the nominee.  Its more to keep people such as Opebo active in Atlasia.

Except he isn't active, somebody tells him to come out and vote and he does. You really never see him around any other time.
Thats the thing.  I hope by giving Opebo a government position, he might possibly pay attention to fantasy politics more and overall be more involved.  I know thats not always the case but Im optomistic.

Besides the fact that he doesn't know the constitution?
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: October 24, 2006, 02:11:24 PM »

Aye
Logged
Bdub
Brandon W
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,116
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: October 24, 2006, 02:42:09 PM »

Aye.

I have decided to vote in favor of the nominee.  Its more to keep people such as Opebo active in Atlasia.

Except he isn't active, somebody tells him to come out and vote and he does. You really never see him around any other time.
Thats the thing.  I hope by giving Opebo a government position, he might possibly pay attention to fantasy politics more and overall be more involved.  I know thats not always the case but Im optomistic.

Besides the fact that he doesn't know the constitution?
I took that heavily into consideration.  He can always read it to gain insight into it.
Logged
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: October 24, 2006, 07:02:34 PM »

I have strong misgvings that the nominee's, how shall I put it, subjective preferences may bear too heavily on his rulings and I'm not for taking chances when it comes to the Supreme Court, therefore, I vote Nay

'Hawk'
Logged
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: October 24, 2006, 07:03:36 PM »

With 6 Ayes, 2 Nays and 0 Abstentions, the Senate, hereby, confirms Opebo as Junior Associate Justice of the Supreme Court

'Hawk'
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,073
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: October 24, 2006, 07:59:13 PM »

Opebo will be to fantasy politics what John Bolton is to the UN.  Read that however you want, but either way I'm glad to see this.
Logged
TomC
TCash101
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,973


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: October 24, 2006, 08:00:56 PM »

Yeah, I'm not disappointed, just surprised.
Logged
Dr. Cynic
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,424
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.11, S: -6.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: October 24, 2006, 10:09:31 PM »

I really think some of you guys take this just a little too seriously. I think Opebo will do fine, considering that we are just pretending after all.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: October 26, 2006, 09:50:32 AM »

Thank you senators.  Will there be an official announcement, or should I just assume I am now ensconced?
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.056 seconds with 12 queries.