2006 Senate endorsement maps (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 03:20:05 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  2006 Senate endorsement maps (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2006 Senate endorsement maps  (Read 7372 times)
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« on: October 27, 2006, 07:48:13 PM »
« edited: November 05, 2006, 06:16:59 PM by Dave Leip »

Post your endorsements

Here is mine



Explanations
WA - Cantwell is better than a Republican, even though I don't particularly like her.
NY - Clinton is too socially conservative. Because she is well-known I am more aware of these positions. She wins no matter what so I would vote for one of the third party candidates.
NE - Can't find anything about the independent in this race, so Nelson will have to do even though he sucks.
IN - No Democrat and a conservative Republican, Libertarian gets my endorsement.
RI - I like Chafee for some reason
CT - Essentially a race between two Democrats, but I don't like Joe Lieberman. Lamont by default.
WV - Byrd isn't that bad
VT - Sanders is better than Tarrant
Everything else - Dem by default
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #1 on: October 28, 2006, 09:33:27 PM »

BRTD, why would you vote for a Republican over a third party candidate in Indiana?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.