Questions for Vorlon
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 10:26:27 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  Questions for Vorlon
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Questions for Vorlon  (Read 1767 times)
AuH2O
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,239


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 28, 2004, 04:48:43 PM »
« edited: June 28, 2004, 04:49:18 PM by AuH2O »

Vorlon (nice name btw, I'm a huge B5 fan)- just saw your latest map, and there are a few things I was wondering:

- Why no love for Bush in the Upper Midwest? Bush lost the popular vote in 2000 by about .5%, but only lost Wisconsin by .2%. If he wins the popular vote, which seems quite likely, he should take Wisconsin- assuming Nader is on the ballot.

Minnesota was slightly less friendly to Bush, even though Nader did better there than with the cheeseheads. But I think there is a trend towards the GOP here... looking back to 1988, the state is roughly +5% more friendly to the GOP.

Michigan I agree goes Kerry at this point, but not by a ton.

- Likewise, I'm puzzled by your VA and NC margins for Bush. He won both handily, now faces a non-Southerner, and should win the popular vote. Virginia at the very least should be dark blue, no?

- Do you think the polls showing New Jersey closer than expected are at all for real? It's gone back and forth there, and I normally don't put too much stock in polls this far out, but it struck me as odd..
Logged
The Vorlon
Vorlon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,660


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: -4.21

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 28, 2004, 05:24:27 PM »
« Edited: June 28, 2004, 05:26:16 PM by The Vorlon »

- Why no love for Bush in the Upper Midwest? Bush lost the popular vote in 2000 by about .5%, but only lost Wisconsin by .2%. If he wins the popular vote, which seems quite likely, he should take Wisconsin- assuming Nader is on the ballot.

It's the Economy Stupid.... Wink

Minnesota was slightly less friendly to Bush, even though Nader did better there than with the cheeseheads. But I think there is a trend towards the GOP here... looking back to 1988, the state is roughly +5% more friendly to the GOP.

Actually, trending semi-hard GOP.  Half of state population now lives in the GOP-Friendly 4 counties surrounding Minni/St. Paul.  

GOP organization on the ground has gone from utterly brain dead to maybe a B+ in the last 8 years.

Even without Nader if Bush wins the Popular vote by say 2.5% he has a 50/50 shot in Minnesota

Michigan I agree goes Kerry at this point, but not by a ton.

Polls say it is close, turnout models say Kerry should be a lot farther ahead than he is....  This far out I trust the models more than the polls Smiley

I expect this state will likely give Kerry a good size "convention bounce"

- Likewise, I'm puzzled by your VA and NC margins for Bush. He won both handily, now faces a non-Southerner, and should win the popular vote. Virginia at the very least should be dark blue, no?

Lots of "PMCs" in these two states (also Arkansas) - (Precarious Middle Class) - Iraq war is bleeding Bush with these folks. Worries about de-industrialization, out sourcing. Workin class "good citizen" vote is bleeding on Bush down here.

BTW - If you're (given your name, a decent bet I think) a republican, pray that Kerry DOES pick Edwards - the GOP will tear him apart on a few issues that play really well down in NC and Virginia.

The 4-6% gaps I show in North Carolina and Virginia avre very cautious estimates - I actually have them in the 8% ish range, just needed to show them as being "states of interest" and my grid cuts off at 6%

- Do you think the polls showing New Jersey closer than expected are at all for real? It's gone back and forth there, and I normally don't put too much stock in polls this far out, but it struck me as odd.

Is 8-10% - close? - I don't think so.

Jersey goes for Kerry.  Take it to the bank. Smiley
Logged
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,409
Timor-Leste


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 28, 2004, 05:28:31 PM »

Actually, trending semi-hard GOP.  Half of state population now lives in the GOP-Friendly 4 counties surrounding Minni/St. Paul.  

Well, you should know that those are outer suburbs and exurbs.  And you all know what happens to them as they 'grow up'.

*ahem*
Logged
The Vorlon
Vorlon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,660


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: -4.21

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 28, 2004, 05:49:26 PM »

Actually, trending semi-hard GOP.  Half of state population now lives in the GOP-Friendly 4 counties surrounding Minni/St. Paul.  

Well, you should know that those are outer suburbs and exurbs.  And you all know what happens to them as they 'grow up'.

*ahem*

Ya, but you will be a moderate DLC kinda democrat, not the scary Tax & spend Kind - so I am not toooo afraid... but still a little Smiley
Logged
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,409
Timor-Leste


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 28, 2004, 06:01:11 PM »

Actually, trending semi-hard GOP.  Half of state population now lives in the GOP-Friendly 4 counties surrounding Minni/St. Paul.  

Well, you should know that those are outer suburbs and exurbs.  And you all know what happens to them as they 'grow up'.

*ahem*

Ya, but you will be a moderate DLC kinda democrat, not the scary Tax & spend Kind - so I am not toooo afraid... but still a little Smiley

Smiley I guess... even though I'm pretty darn socially liberal Tongue

So are you predicting MN will become a 'moderate DLC kinda' Democratic state? Grin
Logged
AuH2O
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,239


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 28, 2004, 07:42:12 PM »

I think MN will be straight up Republican by 2020...
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 28, 2004, 07:51:07 PM »

I think MN will be straight up Republican by 2020...

Agreed.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 28, 2004, 08:36:39 PM »



What about states between Washington and Minnesota and south to about Oklahoma? Will they ever go Democrat?
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 28, 2004, 09:36:57 PM »


What about states between Washington and Minnesota and south to about Oklahoma? Will they ever go Democrat?

The southwest will be solid Dem.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: June 28, 2004, 09:40:16 PM »


What about states between Washington and Minnesota and south to about Oklahoma? Will they ever go Democrat?

The southwest will be solid Dem.


I am talking about those dark blue states in the middle of your map there. Smiley
Logged
platypeanArchcow
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 514


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: June 28, 2004, 09:44:19 PM »


What about states between Washington and Minnesota and south to about Oklahoma? Will they ever go Democrat?

The southwest will be solid Dem.


I am talking about those dark blue states in the middle of your map there. Smiley

Colorado, quite likely.
Logged
AuH2O
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,239


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: June 28, 2004, 09:45:15 PM »

No, they won't. Even the Southwest could be more complicated than meets the eye... might be ripe for a regional 3rd party, or at least an occasional regional candidate.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: June 28, 2004, 09:45:33 PM »

What is the future of say NE, KS, SD, ND, MT, UT, ID, WY in future years? Any of these trend dem?
Logged
AuH2O
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,239


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: June 28, 2004, 09:47:02 PM »

That's what Archcow was asking. And I think Vorlon and Tweed will concur the answer is a resounding 'no'... not so long as the parties retain their current form.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: June 28, 2004, 09:52:18 PM »

This is how I believe we will look in another 20 years. Gray would be tossups.

Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: June 28, 2004, 10:05:37 PM »

NY?  Vt? RI?
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: June 28, 2004, 10:06:38 PM »


I believe they will all be competitive in 30 years.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: June 28, 2004, 10:17:44 PM »


You only have 83 Dem EV's.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.235 seconds with 13 queries.