60 different house districts: New Majority Watch polling
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 12:08:42 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2006 Elections
  2006 Senatorial Election Polls
  60 different house districts: New Majority Watch polling
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: 60 different house districts: New Majority Watch polling  (Read 6051 times)
okstate
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 383


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 30, 2006, 09:23:54 PM »

http://www.majoritywatch.com

(in parentheses are trendlines)

AZ-01 Renzi (R) 48 (46) Simon (D) 46 (50)

CA-04 Doolittle (R) 49 (52) Brown (D) 46 (44)

CA-11 Pombo (R) 46 McNerney (D) 48

C0-04 Musgrave (R) 45 (47) Paccione (D) 48 (41)

CO-07 (open) O'Donnell (R) 46 (48) Perlmutter (D) 51 (47)

CT-02 Simmons (R) 45 (45) Courtney (D) 51 (51)

CT-04 Shays (R) 52 (49) Farrell (D) 43 (42)

CT-05 Johnson (R) 43 (52) Murphy (D) 51 (46)

FL-13 (open) Buchanan (R) 47 (45) Jennings (D) 49 (47)

FL-22 (8/27-29 trends) Shaw (R) 48 (52) Klein (D) 50 (44)

IA-02 Leach (R) 50 (48) Loebsack (D) 48 (48)

IL-06 (open) Roskam (R) 47 (47) Duckworth (D) 48 (46)

IL-08 Bean (D) 50 (47) McSweeney (R) 45 (44)

IL-10 Kirk (R) 46 (46) Seals (D) 48 (44)

IN-02 Chocola (R) 45 (46) Donnelly (D) 48 (50)

IN-08 Hostettler (R) 43 (45) Ellsworth (D) 53 (51)

IN-09 Sodrel (R) 43 (42) Hill (D) 51 (53)

KY-03 Northup (R) 46 (48) Yarmuth (D) 52 (48)

KY-04 Davis (R) 46 (49) Lucas (D) 50 (46)

MN-01 Gutknecht (R) 50 (48) Walz (D) 47 (47)

MN-06 (open) Bachmann (R) 48 (45) Wetterling (D) 47 (49)

NC-08 Hayes (R) 44 (44) Kissell (D) 48 (51)

NC-11 Taylor (R) 44 (44) Shuler (D) 53 (52)

NH-02 Bass (R) 47 Hodes (D) 50

NJ-07 Ferguson (R) 46 (49) Stender (D) 43 (46)

NV-03 Porter (R) 51 (51) Hafen (D) 44 (43)

NY-03 King (R) 51 (47) Mejias (D) 44 (45)

NY-19 Kelly (R) 47 (40) Hall (D) 49 (49)

NY-20 Sweeney (R) 42 (41) Gillibrand (D) 53 (54)

NY-25 Walsh (R) 44 (43) Maffei (D) 53 (51)

NY-29 Kuhl (R) 42 (40) Massa (D) 53 (52)

OH-01 Chabot (R) 46 Cranley (D) 48

OH-02 Schmidt (R) 51 (45) Wulsin (D) 46 (48)

OH-12 Tiberi (R) 51 Shamansky (D) 46

PA-04 Hart (R) 51 Altmire (D) 47

PA-06 Gerlach (R) 46 (46) Murphy (D) 51 (52)

PA-08 Fitzpatrick (R) 47 (53) Murphy (D) 50 (45)

VA-02 Drake (R) 45 (49) Kellam (D) 50 (45)

WA-05 McMorris (R) 51 Goldmark (D) 46

WA-08 Reichert (R) 47 (48) Burner (D) 49 (45)

WI-08 Gard (R) 45 (46) Kagen (D) 51 (48)


Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 30, 2006, 09:30:08 PM »

Dem polling can only show Murphy over Fitz by three? That's more good news for the GOP.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,731


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 30, 2006, 09:35:19 PM »

On the plus side, these results look good. On the negative side, this polling firm is untested.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 30, 2006, 09:38:01 PM »

Why didn't the jokes poll their favorite district (TX 22)?
Logged
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 30, 2006, 09:40:42 PM »

Dem polling can only show Murphy over Fitz by three? That's more good news for the GOP.

RT Strategies is a bipartisan public affairs opinion research and polling organization, headed by Thomas Riehle, a Democrat, and Lance Tarrance Jnr, a Republican pollster. They sponsor of the National Omnibus Poll, and partners of the Cook Political Report/RT Strategies Poll

Dave
Logged
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 30, 2006, 09:48:56 PM »

Why didn't the jokes poll their favorite district (TX 22)?

Only jokes to the extent that their polling seems unfavorable towards your prefered party Phil. Wait until November 8, then you can determine whether they are jokes or not

BTW, as early as May, Riehle and Tarrance were saying Don't Bet on the GOP in 2006 on the basis of the April 27-30 Cook Political Report/RT Strategies national survey. Democrats were leading Republicans by 12 points, 49-37, and by 17 points, 53-36, among registered and most likely voters, respectively, back then

And yes, I'm of the opinion that Fitzpatrick will likely hold his seat

Dave
Logged
Smash255
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,453


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 30, 2006, 09:55:32 PM »

Not to thrilled to see king up 7 in the poll, but the party breakdown of the poll seems to indicate a heavier GOP turnout than expected.  Among those who stated they were certain voters it is a dead heat.
Logged
Conan
conan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,140


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 30, 2006, 09:56:23 PM »

Dem polling can only show Murphy over Fitz by three? That's more good news for the GOP.
This isnt dem polling.
Logged
mgrossbe
Rookie
**
Posts: 180


Political Matrix
E: -4.65, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 30, 2006, 09:57:21 PM »

Once again dave you beat me to the punch but just to further your point here is from their offical site

RT Strategies is a bipartisan polling firm based in Washington, D.C. Constituent Dynamics is a non-partisan IVR polling firm based in Seattle, Washington.
Logged
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 30, 2006, 09:57:52 PM »

http://www.majoritywatch.com

(in parentheses are trendlines)

C0-04 Musgrave (R) 45 (47) Paccione (D) 48 (41)

OH-02 Schmidt (R) 51 (45) Wulsin (D) 46 (48)


Well, all being well come November 7 Democrats get the Oz double with those two Grin

Dave
Logged
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 30, 2006, 09:59:42 PM »

Once again dave you beat me to the punch but just to further your point here is from their offical site

RT Strategies is a bipartisan polling firm based in Washington, D.C. Constituent Dynamics is a non-partisan IVR polling firm based in Seattle, Washington.

... which reminds me ol' Hawk's Indiana Watch Thread needs updating Wink. Plus there's a Research 2000 in on IN-03. Souder's leading Hayhurst 52 to 40

Dave
Logged
mgrossbe
Rookie
**
Posts: 180


Political Matrix
E: -4.65, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 30, 2006, 10:11:02 PM »

it was always a pipe dream but never hurts to have one occasionally. though i would like to see these guys poll the district but if they are not its probably a bad sign.
Logged
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 30, 2006, 10:18:10 PM »

it was always a pipe dream but never hurts to have one occasionally. though i would like to see these guys poll the district but if they are not its probably a bad sign.

I'd be surprised to see RT Strategies/CD poll more than the 60 Districts they have already. They've more or less covered the toss-ups and lean Republicans but you never know. And it's more than likely the election will be won and lost in these 60

Of course, there may well be one or two surprising results way and beyond these 60 Districts

Dave
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 30, 2006, 10:19:05 PM »

I could have sworn that Constituent Dynamics was a Dem firm.
Logged
Boris
boris78
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,098
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -1.55, S: -4.52

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 30, 2006, 10:20:52 PM »

Still, does anyone else these numbers look too good (or bad, depending upon perspective) to be true?
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,731


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 30, 2006, 10:21:47 PM »

I could have sworn that Constituent Dynamics was a Dem firm.

We get to find out if they have a bias on election day.
Logged
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 30, 2006, 10:27:10 PM »

Still, does anyone else these numbers look too good (or bad, depending upon perspective) to be true?

Well, they are, undoubtedly, more encouraging for Democrats then they are Republicans but as pollsters I dare say they hope to be accurate come November 7

I'm yet to make my House predictions but I'll be taking all polls into the equation, among other things, because I hope to be as accurate as possible Smiley

Dave
Logged
sethm0
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 304


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: October 30, 2006, 10:30:45 PM »


 They are a nonpartisan firm, but their polls have favored Democrats significantly compared to other polls. I won't let these results get my hopes up too much, but I guess we'll just wait and see.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: October 30, 2006, 10:49:31 PM »

I'm surpised that GA-12 isn't on their list of districts to poll.  It's close thanks to the partisan gerrymandering the GA GOP did since the last election and it's getting a whole bunch of RNCC, DCCC, and 527 ads. (Barrow is one of the Dems targeted by Bob Perry (dba Economic Freedom Fund).
Logged
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: October 30, 2006, 11:09:30 PM »

I'm surpised that GA-12 isn't on their list of districts to poll.  It's close thanks to the partisan gerrymandering the GA GOP did since the last election and it's getting a whole bunch of RNCC, DCCC, and 527 ads. (Barrow is one of the Dems targeted by Bob Perry (dba Economic Freedom Fund).

They've polled very few Democratic districts, IA-03, IL-08, OH-06, TX-17 and WV-01. I think that's it. I'd have thought GA-08 and GA-12 were ripe for polling as part of this project

Dave
Logged
Downwinder
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 313


Political Matrix
E: -5.42, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: November 01, 2006, 04:10:14 AM »

IMO, these numbers seem pretty right on for the House, especially after this bloody campaign season, were republicans were much more bloodied than Dems.
Logged
HardRCafé
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,364
Italy
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: November 01, 2006, 04:19:49 AM »

They are a nonpartisan firm, but their polls have favored Democrats significantly compared to other polls.

Dem internals are actually more accurate.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: November 01, 2006, 04:44:19 AM »

Well, there might be a wave, who knows...but I'm not gonna bet everything on one poll. Never forget 2004!
Logged
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: November 01, 2006, 07:34:14 AM »

Well, there might be a wave, who knows...but I'm not gonna bet everything on one poll. Never forget 2004!

Neither would I but "Majority Watch" contains polls on no fewer than 60 House Districts, some of which they've polled once, some of which they've polled twice and some of which they've polled three times

Certainly on a number of races, for example, the 'Indiana Three', they are consistent with other pollsters

Dave
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: November 01, 2006, 07:37:31 AM »

Dem polling can only show Murphy over Fitz by three? That's more good news for the GOP.

RT Strategies is a bipartisan public affairs opinion research and polling organization, headed by Thomas Riehle, a Democrat, and Lance Tarrance Jnr, a Republican pollster. They sponsor of the National Omnibus Poll, and partners of the Cook Political Report/RT Strategies Poll

Dave

Bipartisan doesn't mean not partisan.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.051 seconds with 13 queries.