Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
May 25, 2013, 06:47:02 pm
News:
Cast your ballot in the 2012 Mock Election!
Atlas Forum
Election Archive
2006 Elections
2006 Senatorial Election Polls
Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
2
[
3
]
Author
Topic: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen) (Read 26752 times)
12th Doctor
supersoulty
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 20864
Political Matrix
E: 1.38, S: -1.74
Re: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
Reply #50 on:
October 10, 2006, 07:37:10 pm »
Quote from: Deano963 on October 10, 2006, 05:42:09 pm
Quote from: Supersoulty on October 09, 2006, 11:23:22 pm
2) I know our turnout operation is better because
I am here on the ground working for it and looking at what we have vs what they have and because we have reports throughout the state that ours is better statewide
. I thought I had explained that, but I guess I had not made that sufficiently clear.
LOL.
MAN is it going to be funny when you guys and your supposedly superior turnout operation get destroyed by Rendell and Casey!!! LOL.
First off, if you had ever acctually read my comments, I have no doubt Rendell is going to clean up. Second, I'm not saying we are going to win for sure... far from it. I'm saying this thing is gonna be a lot tighter than people think.
Logged
Click for Old Profile Pic
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49405
Re: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
Reply #51 on:
October 10, 2006, 07:59:43 pm »
Quote from: Red on October 10, 2006, 12:24:24 pm
The one thing no Republican ever mentions:
SANTORUM'S APPROVAL RATINGS ARE CRAP
People with net 14% disapproval seldom win, and certainly not Republicans in Kerry states in bad Republican years against the best possible challenger the opponent can get.
Like I said, Republicans must think there is no circumstance whatsoever under which Santorum can lose, because I can't think of more of a worst-case scenario than now.
And when they were good, you refused to acknowledge them so what's the difference? Maybe they're really not bad (See, we can
all
act immature now, BRTD!)
Logged
Quote from: Representative Wyodon on May 06, 2013, 04:31:05 pm
And you're a f
u
cking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
Frodo
YaBB God
Posts: 12616
Re: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
Reply #52 on:
October 10, 2006, 08:08:53 pm »
Quote from: Gustaf on October 10, 2006, 04:23:17 am
Deano has really entered the wrong forum. This is not a forum for Dem hacks, it's supposed to be for serious discussions about elections and politics with RESPECT for the other side.
Is there any particular reason why you are not applying this to jfern?
Logged
Summary of My Political Beliefs
adam
Captain Vlad
YaBB God
Posts: 5029
Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -5.04
Re: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
Reply #53 on:
October 10, 2006, 08:39:13 pm »
I think the one thing that Santorum has going against him is GOP apathy at this point. When both the Gubernatorial and Senatorial race seem more or less over for your candidates...there is little incentive to get you out to the polls. Santorum is doing a poor job of convincing people he can win in the year of the Democrat, which is discouraging a lot of his base.
Logged
Quote from: Joe Republic on March 27, 2007, 06:00:35 pm
This is merely a polite notice.
G -
I
-
U
- L - I - A - N - I
Thank you.
So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
Posts: 68072
Re: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
Reply #54 on:
October 10, 2006, 11:14:31 pm »
Does anyone else find it interesting that the Republicans are violating J.J.'s second rule of elections?
I wonder if J. J. is going to violate his own rule too.
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
YaBB God
Posts: 18969
Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13
Re: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
Reply #55 on:
October 11, 2006, 04:20:21 pm »
Can you say Debbie Stabenow?
I stand by my prediction Rick Santorum will win, but I wouldn't mind Casey if he doesn't change his views.
He's an idiot, but at least he's pro-life and pro-FMA
Logged
Gov. Christopher J. Christie
OC
olawakandi
YaBB God
Posts: 8399
Re: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
Reply #56 on:
October 11, 2006, 07:58:09 pm »
That was the point of picking Casey, they needed someone that will be close to Santorum in order to win. Any other Dem like Pennachio which I supported before Casey would of lost, and 2004 with Hoeffel proved this correct.
«
Last Edit: October 11, 2006, 08:01:47 pm by Quincy
»
Logged
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49405
Re: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
Reply #57 on:
October 11, 2006, 09:14:16 pm »
Quote from: Quincy on October 11, 2006, 07:58:09 pm
That was the point of picking Casey, they needed someone that will be close to Santorum in order to win. Any other Dem like Pennachio which I supported before Casey would of lost, and 2004 with Hoeffel proved this correct.
Correct except the 2004 part. Hoeffel didn't necessarily lose because of his views that year. He was running against a fairly popular incumbent and Hoeffel's own name recognition was terrible especially because he didn't face a primary. I do believe his liberalism would have cost him the race if he ran this year though. I am glad
you
realize, though, that a Casey Dem is what it takes to win this seat and not liberals like Pennacchio, Hafer, Hoeffel, etc.
Logged
Quote from: Representative Wyodon on May 06, 2013, 04:31:05 pm
And you're a f
u
cking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
Posts: 68072
Re: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
Reply #58 on:
October 11, 2006, 09:30:42 pm »
Quote from: DownWithTheLeft on October 11, 2006, 04:20:21 pm
Can you say Debbie Stabenow?
I stand by my prediction Rick Santorum will win, but I wouldn't mind Casey if he doesn't change his views.
He's an idiot, but at least he's pro-life and pro-FMA
Casey is anti-FMA.
Logged
So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
Posts: 68072
Re: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
Reply #59 on:
November 12, 2006, 01:36:49 pm »
Quote from: Supersoulty on October 09, 2006, 12:32:14 pm
The final result will be within 2% either way, you can quote me on that.
Fine.
What happened to this supposed amazing ground game of Ricky's?
Logged
poughies
YaBB God
Posts: 928
Re: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
Reply #60 on:
November 12, 2006, 02:01:23 pm »
no he was right each of them were within two percent of a number divisible by 10.... of course not 50, but rather 60 and 40.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 26097
Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70
Re: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
Reply #61 on:
November 12, 2006, 05:14:02 pm »
Quote from: Frodo on October 10, 2006, 08:08:53 pm
Quote from: Gustaf on October 10, 2006, 04:23:17 am
Deano has really entered the wrong forum. This is not a forum for Dem hacks, it's supposed to be for serious discussions about elections and politics with RESPECT for the other side.
Is there any particular reason why you are not applying this to jfern?
No.
Logged
Quote from: The Pauper of the Surf and the Jester of Tortuga on July 14, 2011, 01:20:59 am
This place really has become a cesspool of degenerate whores...
Economic score: +0.9
Social score: -2.61
In MN for fantasy stuff, member of the most recently dissolved centrist party.
Grad Students are the Worst
Alcon
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 31289
Re: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)
«
Reply #62 on:
November 12, 2006, 05:34:25 pm »
Quote from: Frodo on October 10, 2006, 08:08:53 pm
Quote from: Gustaf on October 10, 2006, 04:23:17 am
Deano has really entered the wrong forum. This is not a forum for Dem hacks, it's supposed to be for serious discussions about elections and politics with RESPECT for the other side.
Is there any particular reason why you are not applying this to jfern?
At the end of the day, jfern yells at us a lot for destroying the world and then pretty much does the Internet equivalent of settling down and drinking a beer with us.
Deano pretty much comes here for the yelling.
Logged
n/c
Pages:
1
2
[
3
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...