Should Senators serve 4 year terms instead of 6 year terms? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 05:25:20 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Should Senators serve 4 year terms instead of 6 year terms? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Should Senators serve 4 year terms instead of 6 year terms?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
#3
Undecided
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 21

Author Topic: Should Senators serve 4 year terms instead of 6 year terms?  (Read 2022 times)
Citizen James
James42
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,540


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -2.78

« on: November 29, 2006, 06:32:37 PM »

I've honestly never understood why senators have 6-year terms.  Is there any other position in the United States with that term length?  4-year terms seems to be the most standard.

The Senate is supposed to have slow turnover, its supposed to be the least affected by the passing whims of the electorate.  Thats that the House is for, with its short 2 year terms.  By staggering the election of Senators so that only one third of the body is up for re-election every two years it insures continuity.  It makes for a simple progression, the House has a 2 year turnover, the Presidency 4 years, and the Senate 6 years.

From the federalist papers #62:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 14 queries.