Trident
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 12:57:35 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Trident
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Poll
Question: Should the U.K replace Trident?
#1
Yes
 
#2
Yes, but only half of it
 
#3
No, replace with cheaper system
 
#4
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 20

Author Topic: Trident  (Read 5367 times)
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,678
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: March 13, 2007, 05:40:06 AM »

The general estimate is that at least 100 Labour M.P's will rebel on the issue.

And some Greenpeace people have climbed a crane at the Commons...

Not exactly going to help matters is it?
Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,847


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: March 13, 2007, 08:54:02 AM »

I think the whole issue is a little shortsighted- a 'blind renewal' of Trident is the worst case scenario, we need a debate about it. Now Trident is currently based at Faslane in the west of Scotland. What happens if 5 or 10 years down the line Scotland becomes independent? The government can try and rent the base, but logistically and diplomatically having your main nuclear arsenal based in a foreign nation is just asking for trouble and I don't believe we would stand for it. If we did the 'rent' would be sky high. If it was too expensive to rent you would have to construct or refit a new base. Again continued cost.

I'm in favour of missile defense, but that doesn't mean we have to back the status quo.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: March 13, 2007, 03:16:12 PM »

I'd imagine that either England would concentrate all of its nuclear activities at Devonport or that they'd arrange to do more than just missile servicing at Kings Bay, Georgia, but also warhead storage and maintenance to replace RNAD Coulport.
Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,847


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: March 14, 2007, 08:38:48 AM »

Still no idea how the Scottish Labour patsys MP's will vote. I expect a rebellion of some significance would do Labour some good north of the border; to vote with the government on this wouldn't bode well for Labour's election campaign where Trident, despite not being devolved is a suprisingly big issue. To do so would focus yet more negative reaction on Labour who decided, in an election stunt yesterday, to give nurses their measly pay rise in one lump on April 1st rather than two as Gordon Brown had intended. It was a cheap trick that has been attacked even in usually sympathetic press circles.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,678
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: March 14, 2007, 10:01:30 AM »

Well two Scottish M.P's have resigned from the government over this so...
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,678
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: March 14, 2007, 03:14:05 PM »

Vote is in, Govt. wins it (no suprise). Not sure how many Labour M.P's rebelled but probably around 80, maybe more than that.
Will post a list when one can be found.

Oh and two more people resigned from the Government over this; Stephen Pound and Chris Ruane.
Logged
KEmperor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,454
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: -0.05

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: March 14, 2007, 05:47:22 PM »

Well two Scottish M.P's have resigned from the government over this so...

I know only the basics of British politics, so can you explain why this is such an issue for the Scots in particular?

Is it simply because it's located there?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,678
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: March 14, 2007, 06:10:38 PM »

Is it simply because it's located there?

Something like that IIRC.

---

List of rebels is here

My M.P rebelled by the look of it (no suprise). Some of the names are odd though; Godsiff?!!
Interesting to note that Rhodri Morgan's wife rebelled.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,678
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: March 14, 2007, 08:06:53 PM »

Out of interest, does anyone know if any M.P's from other parties rebelled?
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: March 14, 2007, 09:00:16 PM »

So what exactly happened here?  I didn't quite get the resolution.

Did Britain ban chewing gum once and for all?
Logged
KEmperor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,454
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: -0.05

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: March 14, 2007, 09:05:21 PM »

So what exactly happened here?  I didn't quite get the resolution.

Did Britain ban chewing gum once and for all?

No, apparently the Scottish and a lot of Labour MPs wanted it banned but enough Conservatives sided with Labour to keep it.  This should be a surprise to no one, since it is common knowledge that the Tories are a shill of the Chewing Gum Industry.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,678
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: March 18, 2007, 10:30:26 AM »


Whu?!

*thud*
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.037 seconds with 13 queries.