LA-02 runoff predictions thread
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 07:11:50 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  LA-02 runoff predictions thread
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
Author Topic: LA-02 runoff predictions thread  (Read 9414 times)
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,597


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #75 on: December 09, 2006, 11:53:32 PM »

Jefferson is useless; the Democrats should refuse to allow him to caucus with them.
Logged
Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon
htmldon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,983
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.03, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #76 on: December 10, 2006, 12:05:09 AM »

But like the rest of the south, they value corruption over competance.

Really?

Logged
Deano963
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,866


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #77 on: December 10, 2006, 12:46:46 AM »

I'm trying to figure out which is more amusing:  Jefferson winning or fernie's comments on this thread about the South.

Well there's nothing amusing about a corrupt congressman being reelected so that only leaves one option.
Logged
HardRCafé
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,364
Italy
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #78 on: December 10, 2006, 01:29:23 AM »

You've gotta be kidding me that these people are stupid enough to reelect someone who was taped accepting a $100,000 bribe.

And yet Murtha is totally awesome like for real!
Logged
they don't love you like i love you
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 112,944
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #79 on: December 10, 2006, 01:42:03 AM »


It would be comparable if Menendez had actually been taped accepting bribes, and if Menendez could be voted out without flipping control of the Senate to Republicans, and if Menendez was running against someone who wasn't a braindead fu'cking idiotic piece of human gabage who I'd laugh if he got hit by a bus (same applies to Jefferson to of course)
Logged
Deano963
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,866


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #80 on: December 10, 2006, 01:50:46 AM »

You've gotta be kidding me that these people are stupid enough to reelect someone who was taped accepting a $100,000 bribe.

And yet Murtha is totally awesome like for real!

Look everyone! The one-liner Troll is back!
Logged
they don't love you like i love you
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 112,944
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #81 on: December 10, 2006, 02:00:29 AM »
« Edited: December 10, 2006, 02:05:38 AM by Senator BRTD »

Precinct-by-precinct results for this race from LA SOS.  They don't help me much, because I don't know where the precincts are, actually.

http://www.sos.louisiana.gov:8090/cgibin/?rqstyp=elcmp&rqsdta=12090614519063

All of the outstanding precincts are in Orleans Parish and right now Carter is leading in that parish slightly.  But she got absolutely killed in Jefferson Parish, pretty ugly all told.

I don't know where they are either, but a membership does give how they voted in 2004. Most of Ward 4 in Orleans is Republican, Bush won every precinct from 9 on up. But it appears that none of htose are in the District (probably are in District 1)

At a first glance, it appears Carter did best in what I'm guessing are mostly white Democratic areas (the type of places that voted "only" 70% for Kerry instead of >90%), which is hardly suprising. It also looks like the Republican precincts might not be in the district, in which case it'll be tough to see how Republicans voted.
Logged
they don't love you like i love you
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 112,944
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #82 on: December 10, 2006, 02:10:01 AM »

From a quick glance, it appears this was mostly just really polarized racial voting. Blacks voted Jefferson, whites voted Carter. That pretty much sums it up.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,676
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #83 on: December 10, 2006, 07:55:16 AM »

The racial split is pretty obvious, although whiter areas seem to have gone stronger for Carter than blacker areas for Jefferson.
Logged
Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon
htmldon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,983
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.03, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #84 on: December 10, 2006, 11:40:02 AM »

Welcome to the world you have created, Democrats.
Logged
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #85 on: December 10, 2006, 03:13:03 PM »

Ahem excuse me?  That must be the most irrational/stupidest thing you have ever said, and believe me there are a lot of contenders for it. 
Logged
Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon
htmldon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,983
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.03, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #86 on: December 10, 2006, 04:07:09 PM »

Ahem excuse me?  That must be the most irrational/stupidest thing you have ever said, and believe me there are a lot of contenders for it. 

You think an entire race of people voting 95% for one party is healthy?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,676
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #87 on: December 10, 2006, 04:10:12 PM »

Has it ever occured to you quite why that might be, Donald?
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #88 on: December 10, 2006, 04:11:49 PM »

Has it ever occured to you quite why that might be, Donald?

Because they are used to getting disappointed and taken advantage of by that party, Albert/Alfred?   Tongue
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #89 on: December 11, 2006, 10:12:39 AM »

Why the smilie? Nagin would have won this.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,676
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #90 on: December 11, 2006, 10:18:06 AM »


I know; I wasn't having a go at Nagin there.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.05 seconds with 11 queries.