2008 Senate Matchups: Minnesota
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 12:28:26 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  2008 Senate Matchups: Minnesota
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Who would win?
#1
Norm Coleman (R)
 
#2
Al Franken (D)
 
#3
Peter Hutchinson (I)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 21

Author Topic: 2008 Senate Matchups: Minnesota  (Read 3640 times)
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 12, 2006, 11:13:03 AM »

The site of the 2008 Republican National Convention in Minneapolis-Saint Paul, Minnesota statewide also sees a highly competetive Senate race.  Senator Norm Coleman, a Republican narrowly elected in 2002, faces Democratic comedian, author and President of Air America, a nationwide left-wing broadcaster, Al Franken.

Having faced stiff competetion in the DFL primary, Franken defeats former state Attorney General Mike Hatch and attorney Ford Bell in a surprising upset. Derided by his primary opponents and inexperienced, Franken comes out swinging against Coleman calling him 'incompetent' and a 'conservative wolf in sheep's clothing'.  Despite this, the GOP Senator styles himself a moderate. The central issue of the campaign appears to be the Iraq War.  Franken sharply criticises Coleman for failing to stand-up to George W. Bush and for being humiliated by British MP George Galloway.  Coleman insists he did stand-up to Bush and calls attention to himself as an independent. 

Franken is seen by some as a lightweight, however, he energises the grassroots in a close race.  With presidential polls showing Minnesota leaning toward the Democratic column, the Senate race is tight.  Coleman begins with a 45%-36% lead but by October Franken leads 48%-47%.  The NRSC makes defence of the seat a top priority, with pivotal ads highlighting Franken's lack of governmental experience.  Franken, however, stumps alongside Bill Clinton, Amy Klobuchar and Mike Hatch.  Going into November, the race is rated a pure toss-up.
Logged
Rob
Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,277
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 12, 2006, 11:29:18 AM »

Rybak would be a far superior candidate, but Franken wins.
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 12, 2006, 11:31:49 AM »

Rybak would be a far superior candidate, but Franken wins.

lol
Logged
Rob
Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,277
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 12, 2006, 11:35:25 AM »

Franken is a joke, but Coleman is a terrible fit for the state. It'll be hilarious to watch lil' Normy scramble for the center over the next two years, only to be Santorumized and humiliated at the polls.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,016
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 12, 2006, 12:18:46 PM »

Hutchinson wouldn't be a big factor in this race. He wouldn't do any better than Fitzgerald did.

The only reason he did so well in the Governor's race is there were lots of people who hated both Hatch and Pawlenty.
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 12, 2006, 01:10:11 PM »

Franken is a joke, but Coleman is a terrible fit for the state. It'll be hilarious to watch lil' Normy scramble for the center over the next two years, only to be Santorumized and humiliated at the polls.

youre suffering from the brtd syndrome....thinking every election year from here on out will have the same atmosphere as 2006. 

i also think it is a mighty big stretch to compare coleman to santorum.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,474
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 12, 2006, 01:11:28 PM »

Coleman. I would love to see Franken speaking on the Senate floor though. It would certainly boost C-SPAN's ratings.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,016
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 12, 2006, 03:41:14 PM »

Franken is a joke, but Coleman is a terrible fit for the state. It'll be hilarious to watch lil' Normy scramble for the center over the next two years, only to be Santorumized and humiliated at the polls.

youre suffering from the brtd syndrome....thinking every election year from here on out will have the same atmosphere as 2006. 

i also think it is a mighty big stretch to compare coleman to santorum.

Remember this?


It's also not a stretch to compare Coleman to Kennedy, and well, we saw in this race what Minnesota thinks of moron Bushbots.
Logged
Rococo4
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,491


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 12, 2006, 03:49:07 PM »

Franken is a joke, but Coleman is a terrible fit for the state. It'll be hilarious to watch lil' Normy scramble for the center over the next two years, only to be Santorumized and humiliated at the polls.

youre suffering from the brtd syndrome....thinking every election year from here on out will have the same atmosphere as 2006. 

i also think it is a mighty big stretch to compare coleman to santorum.

agreed.....every year is not 2006.  Coleman should beat Franken, in light of what happened last time the state elected a non-politican to such a high office in a major race (Ventura)
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: December 12, 2006, 04:14:43 PM »

Franken is a joke, but Coleman is a terrible fit for the state. It'll be hilarious to watch lil' Normy scramble for the center over the next two years, only to be Santorumized and humiliated at the polls.

youre suffering from the brtd syndrome....thinking every election year from here on out will have the same atmosphere as 2006. 

i also think it is a mighty big stretch to compare coleman to santorum.

Remember this?


It's also not a stretch to compare Coleman to Kennedy, and well, we saw in this race what Minnesota thinks of moron Bushbots.

well i reckon those minnesota senate seats are just 'gone for good'  eh?

if norm coleman can beat an icon (in delusional democrat's minds) walter mondale, he sure as hell can beat a failed radio talk show host and comedy writer.
Logged
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: December 12, 2006, 04:16:05 PM »

2002 was a different though, the most recent GOP equivalent of a 2006.  I think Franken would barely beat Coleman, something in the region of:

MINNESOTA SENATE
Franken (D) 49%
Coleman (R) 48%
Fitzgerald (I) 2%

Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: December 12, 2006, 04:19:37 PM »

2002 was a different though, the most recent GOP equivalent of a 2006.  I think Franken would barely beat Coleman, something in the region of:

MINNESOTA SENATE
Franken (D) 49%
Coleman (R) 48%
Fitzgerald (I) 2%



it most certainly wasnt the gop equivalent of 2006.

2002 had a slight gop lean. 
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: December 12, 2006, 04:21:22 PM »

2002 was a different though, the most recent GOP equivalent of a 2006.  I think Franken would barely beat Coleman, something in the region of:

MINNESOTA SENATE
Franken (D) 49%
Coleman (R) 48%
Fitzgerald (I) 2%



it most certainly wasnt the gop equivalent of 2006.

2002 had a slight gop lean. 

Exactly. If anything, 2004 was more GOP.
Logged
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: December 12, 2006, 04:26:32 PM »

The national vote was slightly more GOP in 2002, 2004 was almost dead even.  If the Colorado Senate race between Salazar and Coors had taken place in 2002 - Coors would have won, for example. 
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: December 12, 2006, 04:27:03 PM »

Coleman (R) 49%
Franken (D) 42%
Hutchinson (I) 9%
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: December 12, 2006, 04:29:44 PM »

  If the Colorado Senate race between Salazar and Coors had taken place in 2002 - Coors would have won, for example. 

i disagree.
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: December 12, 2006, 07:41:05 PM »

I hope the people who are voting for Franken think its someone else:

Coleman 59%
Franken 34%
Hutchinson 7%
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: December 12, 2006, 07:47:41 PM »

I hope the people who are voting for Franken think its someone else:

Coleman 59%
Franken 34%
Hutchinson 7%

Yeah...no.
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: December 12, 2006, 07:49:11 PM »

I hope the people who are voting for Franken think its someone else:

Coleman 59%
Franken 34%
Hutchinson 7%

Yeah...no.

Well see, still a long way off, this prediction I actually believe
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: December 12, 2006, 07:52:12 PM »

Coleman with over 50%
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: December 12, 2006, 07:53:44 PM »

I hope the people who are voting for Franken think its someone else:

Coleman 59%
Franken 34%
Hutchinson 7%

Yeah...no.

Well see, still a long way off, this prediction I actually believe

It could happen.  But there's no real indication that it will.
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: December 12, 2006, 07:58:55 PM »

I hope the people who are voting for Franken think its someone else:

Coleman 59%
Franken 34%
Hutchinson 7%

Yeah...no.

Well see, still a long way off, this prediction I actually believe

It could happen.  But there's no real indication that it will.

Again, but what's the fun of making a mainstream prediction?
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: December 12, 2006, 08:15:52 PM »

Again, but what's the fun of making a mainstream prediction?

Why is a non-mainstream one any more fun?
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: December 12, 2006, 08:17:19 PM »

Again, but what's the fun of making a mainstream prediction?

Why is a non-mainstream one any more fun?

Because if you just have people spewing out the same boring prediction there's no debate
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,016
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: December 12, 2006, 09:44:23 PM »

Franken is a joke, but Coleman is a terrible fit for the state. It'll be hilarious to watch lil' Normy scramble for the center over the next two years, only to be Santorumized and humiliated at the polls.

youre suffering from the brtd syndrome....thinking every election year from here on out will have the same atmosphere as 2006. 

i also think it is a mighty big stretch to compare coleman to santorum.

Remember this?


It's also not a stretch to compare Coleman to Kennedy, and well, we saw in this race what Minnesota thinks of moron Bushbots.

well i reckon those minnesota senate seats are just 'gone for good'  eh?

if norm coleman can beat an icon (in delusional democrat's minds) walter mondale, he sure as hell can beat a failed radio talk show host and comedy writer.

I'm not saying Franken is a good candidate (which he certainly isn't). Just pointing out that your Minnesota prediction this year was so laughable you aren't exactly in the position to make definitive statements on it.

And the predictions with Hutchinson doing better than he did in the Governor's race are rather ridiculous. Barely anyone knows anything about the guy. The only reason he did so well is there were tons of people who hated both Hatch and Pawlenty.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.069 seconds with 13 queries.