Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
May 21, 2013, 09:44:44 am
News:
Please delete your old personal messages.
Atlas Forum
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
Presidential Election Trends
(Moderator:
Bacon King
)
States which are the least likely to have all their counties go to one candidate
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
2
Author
Topic: States which are the least likely to have all their counties go to one candidate (Read 5927 times)
RBH
YaBB God
Posts: 2088
States which are the least likely to have all their counties go to one candidate
«
on:
December 16, 2006, 12:28:47 am »
Kentucky.
They had 8 counties go to McGovern, 20 go to Mondale, and 20 go to Goldwater.
I think Kentucky is one of the few states that has streaks of counties going for one party for 140 years on both sides.
Logged
RBH
Grad Students are the Worst
Alcon
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 31289
Re: States which are the least likely to have all their counties go to one candi
«
Reply #1 on:
December 16, 2006, 12:34:17 am »
I can't really think of any where I think it's impossible...Kentucky is up there, though.
Logged
n/c
Gabu
YaBB God
Posts: 28774
Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52
Re: States which are the least likely to have all their counties go to one candi
«
Reply #2 on:
December 16, 2006, 05:54:09 am »
New York comes to mind. Even in Democratic landslides, there's always Hamilton County, and even in Republican landslides, there's always the Bronx.
Logged
"To me, 'underground' sounds like subway trains. That's the only sound I associate with 'underground'." - Everett
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
YaBB God
Posts: 29150
Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36
Re: States which are the least likely to have all their counties go to one candi
«
Reply #3 on:
December 16, 2006, 05:55:59 am »
California
Logged
Gabu
YaBB God
Posts: 28774
Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52
Re: States which are the least likely to have all their counties go to one candi
«
Reply #4 on:
December 16, 2006, 06:14:42 am »
Quote from: jfern on December 16, 2006, 05:55:59 am
California
After looking them up, yeah, that one's better than mine. California only did this once (in presidental elections) in the 20th century (1920) while New York did it three times (1920, 1924, 1964). It also has indeed never happened with Kentucky in the time period for which Dave has maps, but since those end at 1940, it's inconclusive.
Logged
"To me, 'underground' sounds like subway trains. That's the only sound I associate with 'underground'." - Everett
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
YaBB God
Posts: 18969
Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13
Re: States which are the least likely to have all their counties go to one candidate
«
Reply #5 on:
December 16, 2006, 08:06:17 am »
NJ, Hudson and Sussex would never switch there too hyperpartisan
Logged
Gov. Christopher J. Christie
Inks.LWC Supports Chuck Hagel
Inks.LWC
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 31503
Re: States which are the least likely to have all their counties go to one candidate
«
Reply #6 on:
December 16, 2006, 01:25:19 pm »
Michigan--w/ wayne county, it will NEVER happen.
Logged
Harry
YaBB God
Posts: 17664
Re: States which are the least likely to have all their counties go to one candi
«
Reply #7 on:
December 16, 2006, 01:26:11 pm »
The answer is obviously Mississippi.
The black counties will never vote with the white redneck counties.
Hitler could run as a Democrat and win some counties, and also win some counties as a Republican.
Logged
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 21494
Re: States which are the least likely to have all their counties go to one candi
«
Reply #8 on:
December 16, 2006, 02:27:27 pm »
Quote from: Harry on December 16, 2006, 01:26:11 pm
The answer is obviously Mississippi.
The black counties will never vote with the white redneck counties.
Hitler could run as a Democrat and win some counties, and also win some counties as a Republican.
The same holds true for South Carolina.
Logged
“Always it is easier to pay homage to prophets than to heed the direction of their vision.”
Clinton Lee Scott
Read
Fat Man on a Diet
, an alternate history in which the history of atomic weapons does not go as it did in our timeline.
Verily
Cuivienen
YaBB God
Posts: 16900
Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78
Re: States which are the least likely to have all their counties go to one candi
«
Reply #9 on:
December 16, 2006, 03:31:49 pm »
Quote from: DownWithTheLeft on December 16, 2006, 08:06:17 am
NJ, Hudson and Sussex would never switch there too hyperpartisan
Hudson voted for Reagan in 1984 (Essex voted for Mondale) and for Nixon in 1972. (Nixon swept NJ.) Sussex voted for Johnson in 1964. (Johnson swept NJ.)
Logged
HamRadioRocks
jhsu
YaBB God
Posts: 502
Re: States which are the least likely to have all their counties go to one candi
«
Reply #10 on:
December 16, 2006, 06:30:22 pm »
Illinois - Even Alan Keyes managed to carry a few counties in the face of the biggest landslide election for governor in state history. At the other extreme, I can't imagine a Republican carrying Cook County considering how strongly Democratic the city of Chicago is.
Iowa - Johnson County (which contains Iowa City) is more Democratic than Massachusetts while Sioux County (in the far northwest) is more Republican than Utah.
South Dakota - This state has counties that are at least as heavily Democratic as Washington DC and counties that are at least as heavily Republican.
Texas - This state is so big and so diverse that I can't imagine a candidate carrying all counties given how heavily Democratic some of the southern counties are and how heavily Republican the northwestern part of the state is.
Logged
Don't call him McCain, McBush, or McSame. His name is McNicotine! Mr. "Smoke Smoke Smoke, Smoke Smoke Iran" has a tobacco lobbyist for a senior adviser.
Grad Students are the Worst
Alcon
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 31289
Re: States which are the least likely to have all their counties go to one candi
«
Reply #11 on:
December 16, 2006, 06:34:34 pm »
Quote from: HamRadioRocks on December 16, 2006, 06:30:22 pm
South Dakota - This state has counties that are at least as heavily Democratic as Washington DC and counties that are at least as heavily Republican.
Herseth almost did it. She just missed Douglas County.
Logged
n/c
Gabu
YaBB God
Posts: 28774
Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52
Re: States which are the least likely to have all their counties go to one candi
«
Reply #12 on:
December 16, 2006, 08:36:00 pm »
Quote from: Inks.LWC on December 16, 2006, 01:25:19 pm
Michigan--w/ wayne county, it will NEVER happen.
"Never" might be a bit too strong. It did happen in 1928.
Logged
"To me, 'underground' sounds like subway trains. That's the only sound I associate with 'underground'." - Everett
bullmoose88
YaBB God
Posts: 14284
Re: States which are the least likely to have all their counties go to one candidate
«
Reply #13 on:
December 16, 2006, 08:58:22 pm »
Pennsylvania-Will be hard as hell for a Republican to sweep...Philadelphia county hasn't gone Republican in God knows how long...and theres gotta be a couple counties in the T that wouldn't go democratic.
Logged
A Socially Liberal, Fiscally Conservative NE Republican with some Left-Libertarian/3rd Way Leanings. Simply, a Rockefeller Republican.
According to one poster, I represent a...
Quote from: Kalwejt Assange on December 13, 2010, 01:38:32 pm
Dying bread of Americans.
RBH
YaBB God
Posts: 2088
Re: States which are the least likely to have all their counties go to one candidate
«
Reply #14 on:
December 16, 2006, 10:13:58 pm »
Probably the only time that Kentucky had one candidate win every county in a statewide race.
Wendell Ford v. Jackson Andrews, 1986.
Ford won 74-26, and won 52/48 (889-809) in Clinton County.
Logged
RBH
Sibboleth
Realpolitik
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 53015
Re: States which are the least likely to have all their counties go to one candidate
«
Reply #15 on:
December 17, 2006, 10:22:23 am »
Amazing map there
Logged
'Gentlemen, a desert. A place of savage reference for the good people of Ohio. A place to fear and love. A blasted region. Something to remind us what we hewed out of. A place without malls. An Other for Ohio's Self. Cacti and scorpions and the sun bearing down. Desolation. A place for people to wander alone. To reflect. Away from everything. Gentlemen, a desert.'
RBH
YaBB God
Posts: 2088
Re: States which are the least likely to have all their counties go to one candidate
«
Reply #16 on:
December 18, 2006, 06:35:50 pm »
The closest to a Dem sweep.
Jim Blanchard (D) v. Bill Lucas (R), 1986:
Blanchard won 68/31. Including a 73/26 win in Lucas' home county (Wayne).
Logged
RBH
MaC
Milk_and_cereal
YaBB God
Posts: 9874
Re: States which are the least likely to have all their counties go to one candi
«
Reply #17 on:
December 20, 2006, 02:18:08 am »
Ohio, Texas, Georgia, Missouri, Virginia seem like good candidates-although I'm sure someone will use a map to counterexample.
Logged
Quote from: Citizen James on July 22, 2007, 01:35:02 pm
Faster than a legally fired bullet.
More powerful than railroaded legislation.
Able to leap giant bureaucracy in a single bound.
It's an anarchist. It's a free marketer.
It's... It's...
Super Libertarian
Bacon King
Moderator
YaBB God
Posts: 14223
Re: States which are the least likely to have all their counties go to one candidate
«
Reply #18 on:
December 20, 2006, 07:20:34 am »
Quote from: MaC on December 20, 2006, 02:18:08 am
Ohio, Texas, Georgia, Missouri, Virginia seem like good candidates-although I'm sure someone will use a map to counterexample.
Ohio- in 2004, every county voted for Voinovich.
Georgia- in 1972, every single county went for Nixon, and then in 1976, every single county went for Carter.
Virginia- in 2004, every county voted for J. Warner, though he did not have a Democrat opposing him.
Missouri and Texas look good though.
Logged
Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon
htmldon
YaBB God
Posts: 8802
Political Matrix
E: 1.03, S: -2.26
Re: States which are the least likely to have all their counties go to one candi
«
Reply #19 on:
December 20, 2006, 10:28:49 am »
Quote from: RBH on December 18, 2006, 06:35:50 pm
The closest to a Dem sweep.
Jim Blanchard (D) v. Bill Lucas (R), 1986:
Blanchard won 68/31. Including a 73/26 win in Lucas' home county (Wayne).
God bless Ottawa county
Logged
memphis
YaBB God
Posts: 12559
Political Matrix
E: -3.10, S: -3.83
Re: States which are the least likely to have all their counties go to one candidate
«
Reply #20 on:
December 20, 2006, 04:56:41 pm »
Until Bredesen's re-election, I would have said TN. Amazing that a Dem carried every county in E. Tennessee. Good job Phil!
Logged
Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon
htmldon
YaBB God
Posts: 8802
Political Matrix
E: 1.03, S: -2.26
Re: States which are the least likely to have all their counties go to one candi
«
Reply #21 on:
December 20, 2006, 09:25:38 pm »
Quote from: memphis on December 20, 2006, 04:56:41 pm
Until Bredesen's re-election, I would have said TN. Amazing that a Dem carried every county in E. Tennessee. Good job Phil!
What a sad mandate for murder.
Logged
memphis
YaBB God
Posts: 12559
Political Matrix
E: -3.10, S: -3.83
Re: States which are the least likely to have all their counties go to one candi
«
Reply #22 on:
December 21, 2006, 01:02:16 am »
Quote from: HumanRights® (htmldon) on December 20, 2006, 09:25:38 pm
Quote from: memphis on December 20, 2006, 04:56:41 pm
Until Bredesen's re-election, I would have said TN. Amazing that a Dem carried every county in E. Tennessee. Good job Phil!
What a sad mandate for murder.
I assume you're referring to the TennCare cuts, which really made me angry as well. What was really dumb about them was that TN is surrendering two dollars in federal money for every one dollar it is saving in state money. I'm sure there are forty-nine other states that won't mind taking that federal cash.
Logged
12th Doctor
supersoulty
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 20864
Political Matrix
E: 1.38, S: -1.74
Re: States which are the least likely to have all their counties go to one candidate
«
Reply #23 on:
December 21, 2006, 01:28:45 am »
The real question is, which states are the most likely....
I would say that probably about 45 of the states are geographically or demographically diverse enough to not have all their counties go the same way, even in a landslide.
VT, Mass, NH, CT and RI are the only states that come to mind that lack that kind or diversity.
Logged
Click for Old Profile Pic
Gabu
YaBB God
Posts: 28774
Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52
Re: States which are the least likely to have all their counties go to one candi
«
Reply #24 on:
December 21, 2006, 02:06:47 am »
Quote from: Supersoulty on December 21, 2006, 01:28:45 am
VT, Mass, NH, CT and RI are the only states that come to mind that lack that kind or diversity.
There's also Utah, Wyoming, and Nebraska, both of which frequently have all their counties won by the Republican.
Logged
"To me, 'underground' sounds like subway trains. That's the only sound I associate with 'underground'." - Everett
Pages:
[
1
]
2
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...