States which are the least likely to have all their counties go to one candidate (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 02:04:04 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  States which are the least likely to have all their counties go to one candidate (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: States which are the least likely to have all their counties go to one candidate  (Read 7885 times)
FerrisBueller86
jhsu
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 507


« on: December 16, 2006, 06:30:22 PM »

Illinois - Even Alan Keyes managed to carry a few counties in the face of the biggest landslide election for governor in state history.  At the other extreme, I can't imagine a Republican carrying Cook County considering how strongly Democratic the city of Chicago is.

Iowa - Johnson County (which contains Iowa City) is more Democratic than Massachusetts while Sioux County (in the far northwest) is more Republican than Utah.

South Dakota - This state has counties that are at least as heavily Democratic as Washington DC and counties that are at least as heavily Republican.

Texas - This state is so big and so diverse that I can't imagine a candidate carrying all counties given how heavily Democratic some of the southern counties are and how heavily Republican the northwestern part of the state is.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 12 queries.