Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 21, 2013, 07:47:59 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
| |-+  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Bacon King)
| | |-+  Clinton/Buchanan/Perot 1992
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Clinton/Buchanan/Perot 1992  (Read 2499 times)
afleitch
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 20135


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -8.17

View Profile
« on: April 04, 2004, 10:34:58 am »
Ignore

What if...well what if Pat Buchanan got the nod in 1992, instead of Bush Sr? Who would have won, and would Perot have taken a huger slice of the vote as a result?
Logged

All hail the mighty Apollon, god of the sun

So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 68117
Sweden


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: April 04, 2004, 12:49:45 pm »
Ignore

Buchanan would come in third. He'd carry the southern states Clinton lost, Perot would carry most of the west, and Clinton would win everything else.
Logged

© Tweed the Younger
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34280
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: April 04, 2004, 01:14:08 pm »
Ignore

Buchanan would come in third. He'd carry the southern states Clinton lost, Perot would carry most of the west, and Clinton would win everything else.

Agreed...plus Utah for Pat.  perot would have won Maine.
Logged

"If the Constitution means anything, it surely means that the president does not have unreviewable authority to summarily execute any American whom he concludes is an enemy of the state"

registered somewhere in Georgia AFE
Kodratos
Ataturk
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 786


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: April 04, 2004, 05:10:17 pm »
Ignore

Buchanan would come in third. He'd carry the southern states Clinton lost, Perot would carry most of the west, and Clinton would win everything else.

Agreed...plus Utah for Pat.  perot would have won Maine.

I've often wondered why so much of Maine was behind Perot. What was the deal with that?
Logged
So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 68117
Sweden


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: April 04, 2004, 06:29:04 pm »
Ignore

Maine, like Minnesota has a strong third party/independent tradition. They recentely had a two-term independent governor, and in their latest governor's race, the Green got over 9%. They also elected a Green State Senator.
Logged

So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 68117
Sweden


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: April 04, 2004, 06:31:51 pm »
Ignore

here's my prediction map:



Clinton 411
Buchanan 69
Perot 58
« Last Edit: April 04, 2004, 06:32:37 pm by setyourselfonfire »Logged

© Tweed the Younger
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34280
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: April 04, 2004, 07:03:43 pm »
Ignore

Buchanan would come in third. He'd carry the southern states Clinton lost, Perot would carry most of the west, and Clinton would win everything else.

Agreed...plus Utah for Pat.  perot would have won Maine.

I've often wondered why so much of Maine was behind Perot. What was the deal with that?

The Northeast likes independents.
Logged

"If the Constitution means anything, it surely means that the president does not have unreviewable authority to summarily execute any American whom he concludes is an enemy of the state"

registered somewhere in Georgia AFE
A-Max
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 55


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: April 04, 2004, 09:44:46 pm »
Ignore

Perot's Texan.  No way he loses the Lone Star State.
Logged
Kodratos
Ataturk
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 786


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: April 05, 2004, 05:34:42 pm »
Ignore

Maine, like Minnesota has a strong third party/independent tradition. They recentely had a two-term independent governor, and in their latest governor's race, the Green got over 9%. They also elected a Green State Senator.

I know they are very independent. I am originally from Maine. But Perot?
Logged
ijohn57s
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 451


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: July 10, 2004, 10:58:31 pm »
Ignore

Unfortunately, I must agree that Clinton, as much as I dislike him, would have won even bigger.



Clinton - 388
Perot - 77
Buchanan - 73
« Last Edit: July 10, 2004, 10:59:01 pm by ijohn57s »Logged

For when we were yet without strength, in due time Christ died for the ungodly. For scarcely for a righteous man will one die: yet peradventure for a good man some would even dare to die. But God commendeth his love toward us, in that,  while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. Romans 5:6-8
PBrunsel
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9644


View Profile WWW
« Reply #10 on: July 11, 2004, 11:14:31 am »
Ignore



Clinton/Gore: 379

Buchanan/Kemp: 146

Perot/Stockdale: 13

I didn't make this map because i'm some huge Buchanan supporter, for I am not. I just want to tell you that Buchanan would have won more electoral votes than Perot. This due to Perot failing to have a large Get Out to Vote effort nation wide. A second reason is Perot's organization was in a mess after he dropped out. He would win some states, but he would not have won more electoral votes than the Republicans.

« Last Edit: July 11, 2004, 11:14:56 am by PBrunsel »Logged


"I know that the Lord is always on the side of the right. But it is my constant anxiety and prayer that I and this nation should be on the Lord's side."
-President Abraham Lincoln, December 1862
??????????
StatesRights
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31527
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

View Profile
« Reply #11 on: July 11, 2004, 11:15:38 am »
Ignore

Here's the Map:

Clinton     - 302
Perot        - 148
Buchanan - 88




If Perot had not dropped out and Bush was still running for the ticket I think Perot could have come very close to winning the election. He was very very popular. Here is that map. Clinton wins however.

Logged
Vasall des Midas
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 56589
Vatican City State


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: July 11, 2004, 11:17:25 am »
Ignore

If I remember correctly both Buchanan and Perot were largely campaigning against NAFTA. If Buchanan had won the nomination, Perot might not even have run. Clinton would have won.
Logged

Liberate yourself from Free Will


Kitty's beardgrowing advice to Mitty.
King
intermoderate
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 22210
United States


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: July 11, 2004, 12:46:53 pm »
Ignore

here's my prediction map:



Clinton 411
Buchanan 69
Perot 58

Perot would have carried his homestate of Texas.
Logged

So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 68117
Sweden


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: July 11, 2004, 01:38:59 pm »
Ignore

Here's the Map:

Clinton     - 302
Perot        - 148
Buchanan - 88




If Perot had not dropped out and Bush was still running for the ticket I think Perot could have come very close to winning the election. He was very very popular. Here is that map. Clinton wins however.



Perot wouldn't had won Maryland, that was one of Clinton's best states. and while his anti-NAFTA views would've gone over well in WV, I think it would've still went with Clinton.
Logged

??????????
StatesRights
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31527
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

View Profile
« Reply #15 on: July 11, 2004, 02:57:39 pm »
Ignore

I still strongly believe if Perot had not dropped out in 92 he would have been our 42nd President. Smiley
Logged
ilikeverin
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14759
Timor-Leste


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: July 11, 2004, 04:06:29 pm »
Ignore

I still strongly believe if Perot had not dropped out in 92 he would have been our 42nd President. Smiley

I wouldn't mind that Smiley
Logged

Folk Representant of the Most Serene Republic of the Midwest, registered in the State of Joy, in Atlasia
Recognized National Treasure of Atlasia
King
intermoderate
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 22210
United States


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: July 11, 2004, 04:10:35 pm »
Ignore

I still strongly believe if Perot had not dropped out in 92 he would have been our 42nd President. Smiley

Maybe, but Perot was starting to decline around the time he dropped out in the summer. However, if he had stayed in the race he might have bogged down Clinton and come in at a strong second.

Stockdale was a bad decsion by Perot. He was just a crazy old man.
Logged

The Duke
JohnD.Ford
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9424


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: -1.23

View Profile
« Reply #18 on: July 11, 2004, 05:06:34 pm »
Ignore


Logged

Shut you hole... Conservatism is dead. I hope I get to see your head paraded on a pike with it.
PBrunsel
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9644


View Profile WWW
« Reply #19 on: July 11, 2004, 05:18:39 pm »
Ignore

I still strongly believe if Perot had not dropped out in 92 he would have been our 42nd President. Smiley

Maybe if he had chosen Sam Nunn as he Vice President.
Logged


"I know that the Lord is always on the side of the right. But it is my constant anxiety and prayer that I and this nation should be on the Lord's side."
-President Abraham Lincoln, December 1862
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Forums Directory