Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 18, 2013, 06:40:26 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
| |-+  Election What-ifs?
| | |-+  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Bacon King)
| | | |-+  1936: Huey Long runs a Third party campaign
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Poll
Question: Who would you vote for?
Roosevelt\Garner   -13 (44.8%)
Landon\Knox   -11 (37.9%)
Long\Lemke   -5 (17.2%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 29

Author Topic: 1936: Huey Long runs a Third party campaign  (Read 1930 times)
Ghyl Tarvoke
Gully Foyle
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9903
Ireland, Republic of


View Profile
« on: December 26, 2006, 07:54:26 pm »
Ignore

The scenario is simple - Huey Long does not get shot in 1935 and instead uses Charles Coughlan's Union party as a platform to run a third party presidential bid, with OTL Union Candidate William Lemke of North Dakota as his running mate.

Long gets the endorsement of many influential organisations and individuals - including the infamous Coughlan himself.

What happens?

Discuss w/maps.
Logged


Quote from: Liveline On Séan Quinn
These are ordinary people Joe, he just wanted to buy a bank
Quote from: Some guy on Facebook
Guess it's a question of perspective & choice of narrative method ...

... and that, by the way, is also one of the reasons why none of Eric Hobsbawm's books has been turned into a succesful Broadway musical so far.
RBH
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2088


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: December 26, 2006, 09:31:11 pm »
Ignore



FDR - 489 EV (51%)
Landon - 32 EV (34%)
Long - 10 EV (14%)

Long's best states: LA, TX, GA, AL, ND, AR, FL, VA, TN, KY, MD, WV, MN, MT
Logged

RBH
True Democrat
true democrat
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7530
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: -2.87

View Profile
« Reply #2 on: December 26, 2006, 11:02:05 pm »
Ignore

I believe Long's plan was to have the Union Party run a candidacy that would split the leftist vote with Roosevelt in 1936.  He was then hoping Roosevelt would lose, so he could win as a Democrat in 1940.
Logged

Michael Bloomberg for President.



Lol Winfield.  This quote is from a thread entitled "what do the following proceed to do if they are not nominated?"
Romney - President of Harvard
Ghyl Tarvoke
Gully Foyle
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9903
Ireland, Republic of


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: December 27, 2006, 06:17:21 pm »
Ignore

I'm suprised (to say the least) that Landon is leading in the poll...
Logged


Quote from: Liveline On Séan Quinn
These are ordinary people Joe, he just wanted to buy a bank
Quote from: Some guy on Facebook
Guess it's a question of perspective & choice of narrative method ...

... and that, by the way, is also one of the reasons why none of Eric Hobsbawm's books has been turned into a succesful Broadway musical so far.
© Tweed the Younger
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34265
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: December 27, 2006, 09:00:42 pm »
Ignore

I'm suprised (to say the least) that Landon is leading in the poll...

There's a strong contingent on this board that hates FDR.
Logged

"If the Constitution means anything, it surely means that the president does not have unreviewable authority to summarily execute any American whom he concludes is an enemy of the state"

registered somewhere in Georgia AFE
True Democrat
true democrat
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7530
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: -2.87

View Profile
« Reply #5 on: December 28, 2006, 03:08:11 pm »
Ignore

I would probably vote for Landon.  Landon was very much pro-New Deal; he just wanted to end the corruption that associated with it.
Logged

Michael Bloomberg for President.



Lol Winfield.  This quote is from a thread entitled "what do the following proceed to do if they are not nominated?"
Romney - President of Harvard
Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon
htmldon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8802
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.03, S: -2.26

View Profile
« Reply #6 on: December 28, 2006, 04:00:55 pm »
Ignore

Definately Landon.  God bless Maine and Vermont!
Logged
Joe Republic
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 28528
United States


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: December 28, 2006, 05:39:52 pm »
Ignore

God bless Maine and Vermont!

As far as presidential elections are concerned, I assume those blessings expired in 1992?
Logged

○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29138


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

View Profile
« Reply #8 on: December 28, 2006, 06:13:17 pm »
Ignore

Definately Landon.  God bless Maine and Vermont!

Here's one for you. Adolf Hitler/ Josef Stalin (R) vs. Jesus Christ / George Washington (D).
Logged
sldhfwrt87345
rcnj3890
Newbie
*
Posts: 13
Political Matrix
E: -2.32, S: -3.65

View Profile
« Reply #9 on: December 28, 2006, 06:43:46 pm »
Ignore

The result would be similar to the result of the 1984 election, except the parties are switched.

People don't realize how dangerous Minnesota is, voting for Hitler and what not.
Logged
RBH
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2088


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: December 28, 2006, 10:31:13 pm »
Ignore

I believe Long's plan was to have the Union Party run a candidacy that would split the leftist vote with Roosevelt in 1936.  He was then hoping Roosevelt would lose, so he could win as a Democrat in 1940.

Red states swung to Roosevelt in 1936, Blue states swung away from Roosevelt in 1936



Hm... seems to be a pattern
Logged

RBH
Senator Ben
benconstine
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29777
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: 0.35

View Profile
« Reply #11 on: September 07, 2007, 02:35:24 pm »
Ignore


Roosevelt: 444 EV
Landon: 8 EV
Long: 79 EV
« Last Edit: September 07, 2007, 02:37:11 pm by benconstine »Logged

Obama High's debate team:

"Now let me be clear...I...I...um...uh...now let me be clear.  I strongly condemn the affirmative in the strongest possible terms, and I am closely monitoring their arguments.  Let me be clear on this."
gorkay
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1107



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: September 07, 2007, 03:20:15 pm »
Ignore

I would probably vote for Landon.  Landon was very much pro-New Deal; he just wanted to end the corruption that associated with it.

Where do you get that?
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Forums Directory