Do you believe that 2007 will have the second coming of Jesus Christ? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 05:08:24 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Do you believe that 2007 will have the second coming of Jesus Christ? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Well?
#1
No
 
#2
Yes
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 69

Author Topic: Do you believe that 2007 will have the second coming of Jesus Christ?  (Read 22737 times)
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,845
Ireland, Republic of


« on: January 03, 2007, 04:50:09 PM »

I hope not, as that would mean that me and most of my other friends are almost certainly doomed to hell.
Logged
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,845
Ireland, Republic of


« Reply #1 on: January 15, 2008, 10:38:48 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Perhaps because, until recently, the western interest in the Islamic world was an esoteric intellectual taste?

Also note unlike Jesus actual known political history has been attributed to Mohammed; the rise of Islamic imperalism in the 100 years after his supposed death. Trying to explain that without reference to 'Mohammed' is rather difficult, no?

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Well, not in the same way I 'know' I am typing on the computer right now.
Logged
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,845
Ireland, Republic of


« Reply #2 on: January 15, 2008, 10:50:24 AM »

Also note unlike Jesus actual known political history has been attributed to Mohammed;

Though on the other hand (no... probably just a different finger) expecting to find known political history that was the direct result of the activities of the preacher son of a carpenter living in a largely illiterate society two thousand years ago is a little silly.


Err Yes, that is my point.

Bono compared the evidence for Jesus to the evidence to Mohammed, implying that the story of Mohammed is believed by Westerners (Whoever they are) not due to evidence but because of OMG POLITICAL CORRECTNESS OMG!!1111. I was merely refuting that. Anyway I tend to strongly believe that Jesus actually existed - even if the events of his life as told in the gospels are probably fabricated - since the alternative is to imply that someone made him up.
Logged
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,845
Ireland, Republic of


« Reply #3 on: January 15, 2008, 03:19:41 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I know; what I got across from your post is that you believe Mohammed is given some reputation as 'untouchable' by western writers due to a supposed Islamic Sympathy? Or perhaps that was my imagination.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

True; but the expansion of Christanity was not a military event unlike Islam. Europe did not turn Christian under a force of arms; unlike say, Iran. In the Koran Mohammed leads conquests which almost certainly did occur; plotting the historical movements of troops on the globe is much easier to decipher than the early history of what was, an underground and much persecuted sect.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I don't think my worldview is particularly commendable. All I report is how I perceive it (or at least I try to), bring other factors into it without skepticism just leads to worst kinds of absolutism. How can we judge one person's opinion on a nebelous human concept - 'religion', 'ethics', 'morality', etc - over another if both people are use external and unprovable forces such as god as justification.
Logged
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,845
Ireland, Republic of


« Reply #4 on: January 15, 2008, 03:25:52 PM »

True; but the expansion of Christanity was not a military event unlike Islam. Europe did not turn Christian under a force of arms; unlike say, Iran.
Most of Europe did, actually.

Yeah, 300+ years after Christ's death. Not quite the same thing. Though I admit I probably should shut up now - my late-Roman Empire knowledge isn't great.
Logged
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,845
Ireland, Republic of


« Reply #5 on: January 15, 2008, 03:47:00 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Oooopsss... (actually my imagination here perhaps proves my later point.. interesting. Wink )

Anyway as I have already said I do believe that Jesus was a real person; even though as an agnostic I believe that most of his life stories as set in the gospels are fabricated (even ignoring the 'godly' stuff: How likely is it that Pilate would have met with Jesus before his execution? All that attention on a minor prophet - do you know how many of those there were in Judea at the time?)

Though I believe that the fabrication took place well before the gospels were written.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Probably Culture. Though I'm just speculating here tbh. I admit when I say "I just don't know".

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Perhaps 'know' is too clunky a word. I have received knowledge that Napoleon was defeated at Waterloo and that knowledge is known to reliable and true as written in both primary and secondary sources. But I don't 'know' that in the same way, I know what I ate this morning. Damn English language.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 14 queries.