Who would win these two races in 2008?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 06:57:19 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Who would win these two races in 2008?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Who would win these two races in 2008?  (Read 1647 times)
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,003
Latvia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 10, 2007, 07:56:08 PM »

Montana:
Max Baucus (D)
Conrad Burns (R)

Rhode Island:
Jack Reed (D)
Lincoln Chaffee (R)

my opinion: both lean democrat.
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 10, 2007, 09:38:58 PM »

I'd rate both at least "Likely Democrat", if not "Safe Democrat" for at least the first.
Logged
Stranger in a strange land
strangeland
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,170
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 10, 2007, 09:50:39 PM »

Baucus and Reed; Burns and Chafee are probably both finished in politics. Chafee would only have a chance, and it would only be an outside one at that, if he promised to caucus with the democrats. That said, if he couldn't beat Sheldon Whitehouse as an incumbent, I doubt he could beat Jack Reed. I seriously doubt Chafee will ever want to run against a Democrat again though.

If Reed were to retire however, Chafee would have a very good chance if he ran as a democrat or independent.
Logged
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 11, 2007, 12:43:56 PM »

I doubt that these scenarios would ever happen.  But both Burns and Chafee would be beaten. 
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 11, 2007, 02:16:30 PM »

Baucus would still be safe, and I find it hard to imagine Chafee actually unseating Reed while running as a Republican. (As an Independent he would stand a slightly better chance, but better as in 5% v 1%.)
Logged
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 11, 2007, 03:18:35 PM »

Both Baucus and Reed defeat Burns and Chafee handidly

Dave
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,477
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 11, 2007, 10:22:27 PM »

Logged
CPT MikeyMike
mikeymike
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,513
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.58, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 11, 2007, 10:48:51 PM »

How I see it...

Montana:
Max Baucus: 56%
Conrad Burns 44%

Rhode Island:
Jack Reed 61%
Lincoln Chaffee 39%

Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,477
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: January 12, 2007, 12:21:14 AM »

How I see it...

Montana:
Max Baucus: 56%
Conrad Burns 44%

Rhode Island:
Jack Reed 61%
Lincoln Chaffee 39%



You are way too kind to Burns.
Logged
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: January 12, 2007, 02:20:58 PM »

RHODE ISLAND SENATE:
Reid (D) 66%
Chafee (R) 33%

Reid is incredibly strong in Rhode Island.  His really is a safe seat; he could remain there for another 30 years if he wants to. 

MONTANA SENATE:
Baucus (D) 58%
Burns (R) 41%

Burns is largely discredited now but Baucus has always been more popular
than him in Montana.  Also, Baucus has represented the state since 1979.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: January 12, 2007, 05:01:26 PM »

Burns is old and a little senile, and has been forcibly retired. He could not possibly win the Republican nomination unless no other true Republican runs for the nomination. And while there is a sizeable population in Montana that would, at current, not vote for a Democrat in a federal race under ANY circumstances, ensuring that Burns gets at least to about 40%, it's hard to see him getting anything more than that.

Reed is utterly safe against anybody. Even Lincoln Chafee. Unless he eats dead babies live on tv.

Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,003
Latvia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: January 12, 2007, 06:59:49 PM »

Okay, how about this scenario:
Jack Reed (D)
Lincoln Chaffee (I)
Don Carcieri (R)
Logged
Stranger in a strange land
strangeland
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,170
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: January 12, 2007, 07:12:52 PM »

Okay, how about this scenario:
Jack Reed (D)
Lincoln Chaffee (I)
Don Carcieri (R)

Reed still wins.
Logged
Smash255
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,453


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: January 12, 2007, 07:40:29 PM »

Okay, how about this scenario:
Jack Reed (D)
Lincoln Chaffee (I)
Don Carcieri (R)


reed by a ton.  Only thing carceri would do is take some GOP support away from Chafee. 
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,477
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: January 12, 2007, 11:11:59 PM »

Okay, how about this scenario:
Jack Reed (D)
Lincoln Chaffee (I)
Don Carcieri (R)

Reed still wins in a walk.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 11 queries.