PA: How would the following have turned out?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 06:22:34 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  PA: How would the following have turned out?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: PA: How would the following have turned out?  (Read 692 times)
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 19, 2007, 07:55:15 PM »

A-2004:  Hoeffel vs. Santorum
B-2004:  Casey vs. Specter
C-2004:  Casey vs. Santorum
D-2006:  Hoeffel vs. Santorum
E-2006:  Casey vs. Specter
F-2006:  Hoeffel vs. Specter


I say:
A-Santorum 51, Hoeffel 49
B-Casey 49, Specter 48
C-Casey 53, Santorum 47
D-Hoeffel 54, Santorum 46
E-Casey 51, Specter 45
F-Specter 49, Hoeffel 46
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2007, 11:11:33 PM »

A: Hoeffel 51, Santorum 48
B: Casey 47, Specter 50
C: Casey 54, Santorum 46
D: Hoeffel 55, Santorum 45
E: Casey 49, Specter 51
F: Hoeffel 47, Specter 53

A: I just can't imagine anyone voting for both Kerry and Santorum at the same time.
B: Rife with crossover voters on both sides. Kerry on the ballot helps Specter rather than hurts him against a populist Democrat.
C: See A, with some Republican crossover to Casey.
D: What he lacks in populism Hoeffel makes up for somewhat in actually actively campaigning.
E: Casey doesn't campaign hard enough, and Specter is saved by a fondness for moderate Republicans (much like why Chafee was so close in a much more Democratic state).
F: Not too much sweat broken by Specter.
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2007, 01:35:41 PM »

A-2004:  Hoeffel 46, Santorum 53
B-2004:  Casey 49, Specter 50 (Implausible as hell)
C-2004:  Casey 53, Santorum 46
D-2006:  Hoeffel 49, Santorum 50
E-2006:  Casey 52, Specter 47
F-2006:  Hoeffel 46, Specter 53

Ignoring other candidates. A conservative running in 2006 would take 3-5% from Specter, and 2-4% in 2004.
Logged
TeePee4Prez
Flyers2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,479


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 20, 2007, 04:39:42 PM »

A: Hoeffel 51, Santorum 48
B: Casey 47, Specter 50
C: Casey 54, Santorum 46
D: Hoeffel 55, Santorum 45
E: Casey 49, Specter 51
F: Hoeffel 47, Specter 53

A: I just can't imagine anyone voting for both Kerry and Santorum at the same time.
B: Rife with crossover voters on both sides. Kerry on the ballot helps Specter rather than hurts him against a populist Democrat.
C: See A, with some Republican crossover to Casey.
D: What he lacks in populism Hoeffel makes up for somewhat in actually actively campaigning.
E: Casey doesn't campaign hard enough, and Specter is saved by a fondness for moderate Republicans (much like why Chafee was so close in a much more Democratic state).
F: Not too much sweat broken by Specter.

I would definitely concur with this.  Couldn't have said it any better myself.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 22, 2007, 12:28:51 PM »


A: I just can't imagine anyone voting for both Kerry and Santorum at the same time.

They voted for Gore and Santorum at the same time. And before you go complaining about Klink being weak, Hoeffel is just as bad. He might be charismatic but he comes across as a loose cannon and is unknown.
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 22, 2007, 03:29:50 PM »


A: I just can't imagine anyone voting for both Kerry and Santorum at the same time.

They voted for Gore and Santorum at the same time. And before you go complaining about Klink being weak, Hoeffel is just as bad. He might be charismatic but he comes across as a loose cannon and is unknown.
Yeah.......but Klink was weak. Tongue
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 11 queries.