How would the Ohio Senate race turned out if this had happened?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 01:43:45 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  How would the Ohio Senate race turned out if this had happened?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: How would the Ohio Senate race turned out if this had happened?  (Read 1915 times)
Kevin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,424
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 19, 2007, 11:24:37 PM »

Lets say that Dennis Kucinich got the Democratic nomenation to run against Mike DeWine. How would that have turned out?
Logged
Padfoot
padfoot714
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,532
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 20, 2007, 12:18:12 AM »

Hmmm thats a hard call.  I definately don't think Kucinich would have done as well in the Southeast as Brown did.  I think it would be a lot closer but Kucinich could have pulled it off.  Something like 51%-49% Kucinich victory maybe.
Logged
HardRCafé
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,364
Italy
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2007, 12:56:33 AM »

DeWine would not have had to advertise and would not have started a series of screwups.
Logged
Padfoot
padfoot714
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,532
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 20, 2007, 02:35:41 AM »

DeWine would not have had to advertise and would not have started a series of screwups.
I don't recall any major screw-ups coming out of DeWine's camp.  It was just a bad year for Republicans in Ohio.  DeWine would have had trouble regardless of the candidate really.  Taft and Balckwell pulled the entire GOP down.
Logged
they don't love you like i love you
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 112,935
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2007, 02:36:56 AM »

DeWine would not have had to advertise and would not have started a series of screwups.
I don't recall any major screw-ups coming out of DeWine's camp. 

the ad with the doctored footage of 9.11. That really fuccked DeWien up.
Logged
CPT MikeyMike
mikeymike
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,513
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.58, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 20, 2007, 10:48:52 AM »

Kucinich, would probably be far too liberal in a state wide race. More than likely, it would be close but I'd say a 52%-47% win for DeWine.

I think most people outside his district see him as a joke. I know most of the country see that in him.

Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,288
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 20, 2007, 11:36:07 AM »

Kucinich would've gotten about 32%-36% a the most (way more than he deserves). 
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 20, 2007, 11:39:34 AM »

DeWine 55% Kucinich 45%
Logged
they don't love you like i love you
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 112,935
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: January 20, 2007, 12:55:41 PM »

Brown is just as liberal on the war and economics as Kucinich.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,288
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: January 20, 2007, 06:08:45 PM »

Brown is just as liberal on the war and economics as Kucinich.

Roll Eyes
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,288
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: January 20, 2007, 06:10:09 PM »

Kucinich, would probably be far too liberal in a state wide race. More than likely, it would be close but I'd say a 52%-47% win for DeWine.

I think most people outside his district see him as a joke. I know most of the country see that in him.



I think he should consider it a victory if the country knows who he is Tongue
Logged
they don't love you like i love you
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 112,935
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: January 21, 2007, 12:30:16 PM »


How do they differ?
Logged
Rob
Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,277
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: January 21, 2007, 02:59:58 PM »

Hilariously, Brown is more liberal than Kucinich (according to the American Conservative Union). And he trounced a "moderate" Republican incumbent by double-digits in a Bush state!

Good luck in '08, Buckeye Republicans. Smiley
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,382
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: January 21, 2007, 03:05:57 PM »

Kucinich wins narrowly.  DeWine couldn't beat any Democrat in 2006 in Ohio.  Kuciinich would've surely toned himself down a little bit when he realized he had a chance.
Logged
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: January 21, 2007, 05:24:49 PM »

OHIO SENATE:
Kucinich (D) 51%
DeWine (R) 49%

Kucinich's narrow victory is attributed to the coattails of Ted Strickland. 
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: January 21, 2007, 05:28:26 PM »

49-43-8 DeWine.  Some populist-leaning liberal runs as an indy.
Logged
they don't love you like i love you
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 112,935
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: January 21, 2007, 08:46:32 PM »

Some populist-leaning liberal runs as an indy.

Why? No reason to if they didn't against Brown.
Logged
adam
Captain Vlad
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,922


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -5.04

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: January 21, 2007, 09:19:24 PM »

Kucinich is probably the one Democrat that could not have won that race.
Logged
Padfoot
padfoot714
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,532
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: January 21, 2007, 09:48:31 PM »

Kucinich is probably the one Democrat that could not have won that race.

You think Tubbs Jones could have done better?  Kucinich could have pulled it off.  It would have been close but he could have done it.  Strickland's strong coattails combined with a bad year for the GOP would have carried him into office.  He would be destroyed in 2012 though.
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: January 21, 2007, 11:11:55 PM »

Some populist-leaning liberal runs as an indy.

Why? No reason to if they didn't against Brown.

Brown's rhetoric is much more mainstream than Brown's.  It would be like Ned Lamont challenging Bill Nelson or Tom Carper instead of Joe Lieberman.
Logged
they don't love you like i love you
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 112,935
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: January 22, 2007, 10:46:08 AM »

Some populist-leaning liberal runs as an indy.

Why? No reason to if they didn't against Brown.

Brown's rhetoric is much more mainstream than Brown's.  It would be like Ned Lamont challenging Bill Nelson or Tom Carper instead of Joe Lieberman.

OK, but why would a populist-leaning liberal want to play spoiler? That's exactly what Kucinich is and no liberals have a problem with him actually, it'd be swing voters.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,669
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: January 22, 2007, 10:55:54 AM »

49-43-8 DeWine.  Some populist-leaning liberal runs as an indy.

Why would such a person run against one of their own? (even if Kucinich is a bit of crank and even if he's now as much of a hypocrite over abortion as most American politicians).
Logged
ag
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,828


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: January 22, 2007, 11:39:40 AM »

Kucinich does have a crackpot reputation (which Brown somehow escapes - underservedly, in my view). Crackpots rarely win statewide races.
Logged
they don't love you like i love you
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 112,935
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: January 22, 2007, 01:10:31 PM »

Kucinich does have a crackpot reputation (which Brown somehow escapes - underservedly, in my view). Crackpots rarely win statewide races.

Tom Coburn?
Logged
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: January 22, 2007, 01:28:46 PM »

Kucinich does have a crackpot reputation (which Brown somehow escapes - underservedly, in my view). Crackpots rarely win statewide races.

Tom Coburn?

There is a difference between Tom Coburn and Oklahoma and Dennis Kucinich and Ohio.  The majority of Oklahomans viewed Brad Carson as the more extreme candidate in the 2004 Senate race. 
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.063 seconds with 11 queries.