Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 20, 2014, 01:02:43 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Don't forget to get your 2013 Gubernatorial Endorsements and Predictions in!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
| | |-+  2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
| | | |-+  Bush +15 in South Carolina
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Print
Author Topic: Bush +15 in South Carolina  (Read 23614 times)
Sibboleth
Realpolitik
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 57211
Saint Helena


View Profile WWW
« Reply #25 on: July 04, 2004, 08:45:06 am »
Ignore

Yeah, but the 'Upper South' is less religious than the Deep South- and more prosperous. Smith lost the Upper South largely for economic reasons.

If you believe that you'll believe anything
Logged

AuH2O
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4246


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: July 04, 2004, 12:44:59 pm »
Ignore

Keep in mind, I live in the Upper South... you're just a dork that looks at numbers all day for politics in a country you don't even reside in...
Logged

don't forget to remember, the devil's got pills in his eyes

look, laugh, but don't touch... cut you down to size
??????????
StatesRights
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31302
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

View Profile
« Reply #27 on: July 04, 2004, 01:09:39 pm »
Ignore

Keep in mind, I live in the Upper South... you're just a dork that looks at numbers all day for politics in a country you don't even reside in...

Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked
Logged
Sibboleth
Realpolitik
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 57211
Saint Helena


View Profile WWW
« Reply #28 on: July 04, 2004, 03:02:26 pm »
Ignore

Keep in mind, I live in the Upper South... you're just a dork that looks at numbers all day for politics in a country you don't even reside in...

Responding to this would put me on your level
Logged

AuH2O
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4246


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: July 04, 2004, 05:00:20 pm »
Ignore

On the level of someone with a life? No, I think it's too late for that in your case.

Are you even British, or did you immigrate there from Africa or something?
Logged

don't forget to remember, the devil's got pills in his eyes

look, laugh, but don't touch... cut you down to size
opebo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 47606


View Profile
« Reply #30 on: July 04, 2004, 06:10:07 pm »
Ignore

On the level of someone with a life? No, I think it's too late for that in your case.

Are you even British, or did you immigrate there from Africa or something?

I'll have to interject that claiming to 'have a life' IN a post on this board is pretty hilarious.
Logged

The essence of democracy at its purest is a lynch mob

AuH2O
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4246


View Profile
« Reply #31 on: July 04, 2004, 06:14:52 pm »
Ignore

Fair enough, but everything is relative...
Logged

don't forget to remember, the devil's got pills in his eyes

look, laugh, but don't touch... cut you down to size
ilikeverin
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15563
Timor-Leste


View Profile
« Reply #32 on: July 04, 2004, 07:28:51 pm »
Ignore

On the level of someone with a life? No, I think it's too late for that in your case.

Are you even British, or did you immigrate there from Africa or something?

*chalks this up in case I have to do any debating with you*
Logged

Citizen of the Most Serene Republic of the Midwest, registered in the State of Joy, in Atlasia
Recognized National Treasure of Atlasia
AuH2O
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4246


View Profile
« Reply #33 on: July 04, 2004, 07:40:53 pm »
Ignore

Don't worry, it would be a quick debate and you would be on the losing side. Few years back I was one of the better debaters in the state of VA...
Logged

don't forget to remember, the devil's got pills in his eyes

look, laugh, but don't touch... cut you down to size
Sibboleth
Realpolitik
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 57211
Saint Helena


View Profile WWW
« Reply #34 on: July 05, 2004, 06:09:27 am »
Ignore

Are you even British, or did you immigrate there from Africa or something?

Is this Enoch Powell's ghost I see before me?
Logged

AuH2O
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4246


View Profile
« Reply #35 on: July 05, 2004, 09:53:02 am »
Ignore

I'll take that as a yes. At least give me props for perception... then again, most communists in Britain are of foreign descent. Not Livingstone, of course...
Logged

don't forget to remember, the devil's got pills in his eyes

look, laugh, but don't touch... cut you down to size
Sibboleth
Realpolitik
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 57211
Saint Helena


View Profile WWW
« Reply #36 on: July 05, 2004, 01:13:43 pm »
Ignore

I'll take that as a yes. At least give me props for perception... then again, most communists in Britain are of foreign descent. Not Livingstone, of course...

I'm white actually
Logged

AuH2O
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4246


View Profile
« Reply #37 on: July 05, 2004, 01:25:37 pm »
Ignore

I'll take it not of the Christian variety...
Logged

don't forget to remember, the devil's got pills in his eyes

look, laugh, but don't touch... cut you down to size
Sibboleth
Realpolitik
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 57211
Saint Helena


View Profile WWW
« Reply #38 on: July 05, 2004, 01:27:37 pm »
Ignore

I'll take it not of the Christian variety...

I am a Christian
Logged

AuH2O
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4246


View Profile
« Reply #39 on: July 05, 2004, 03:14:42 pm »
Ignore

By what definition?
Logged

don't forget to remember, the devil's got pills in his eyes

look, laugh, but don't touch... cut you down to size
A18
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 23836
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

View Profile
« Reply #40 on: June 26, 2005, 10:59:32 am »
Ignore

My *guess* for SC (at the moment and presuming that Edwards isn't Kerry's VP pick. If he is the Dems gain in rural SC) is about 52% for Bush and 45% for Kerry.

Off just a bit, eh? Smiley
Logged
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29030
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #41 on: June 27, 2005, 02:48:31 am »
Ignore

My *guess* for SC (at the moment and presuming that Edwards isn't Kerry's VP pick. If he is the Dems gain in rural SC) is about 52% for Bush and 45% for Kerry.

Off just a bit, eh? Smiley

Just a bit indeed considering where the polls were in early July 2004.  If the election had been held then instead of November, Kerry would have won.  Unfortunately for Kerry he had the double debacle of a bad Democratic convention and a good GOP convention.  Had the Democrats been able to hold a decent convention,  Kerry might have won and had the Dems could have had a Senate that was unchanged or even ganed a seat had Vitter lost the runoff in Louisiana.  (Yes I know there was no runoff in the 2004 LA Senate race, but that was just barely and a better Democratic campaign across the board would have.  Also the Dems instead of losing 3 House seats would have picked up 2 or 3 seats depending on whether Colorado requires a plurality or a majority in US House elections.  (With a stronger Dem showing Musgrave would have only gotten a plurality in Colorado 4 instead of the majority she did in real life and Matsunaka would certainly have picked up most of the 4% of the vote for Green Party in the runoff.
Logged

People find meaning and redemption in the most unusual human connections. Khaled Hosseini
Sam Spade
SamSpade
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27871


View Profile
« Reply #42 on: June 27, 2005, 12:23:15 pm »
Ignore

My *guess* for SC (at the moment and presuming that Edwards isn't Kerry's VP pick. If he is the Dems gain in rural SC) is about 52% for Bush and 45% for Kerry.

Off just a bit, eh? Smiley

Just a bit indeed considering where the polls were in early July 2004. If the election had been held then instead of November, Kerry would have won. Unfortunately for Kerry he had the double debacle of a bad Democratic convention and a good GOP convention. Had the Democrats been able to hold a decent convention, Kerry might have won and had the Dems could have had a Senate that was unchanged or even ganed a seat had Vitter lost the runoff in Louisiana. (Yes I know there was no runoff in the 2004 LA Senate race, but that was just barely and a better Democratic campaign across the board would have. Also the Dems instead of losing 3 House seats would have picked up 2 or 3 seats depending on whether Colorado requires a plurality or a majority in US House elections. (With a stronger Dem showing Musgrave would have only gotten a plurality in Colorado 4 instead of the majority she did in real life and Matsunaka would certainly have picked up most of the 4% of the vote for Green Party in the runoff.

That's a lot of ifs.  Smiley
Logged
A18
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 23836
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

View Profile
« Reply #43 on: June 27, 2005, 05:53:38 pm »
Ignore

My *guess* for SC (at the moment and presuming that Edwards isn't Kerry's VP pick. If he is the Dems gain in rural SC) is about 52% for Bush and 45% for Kerry.

Off just a bit, eh? Smiley

Just a bit indeed considering where the polls were in early July 2004.  If the election had been held then instead of November, Kerry would have won.  Unfortunately for Kerry he had the double debacle of a bad Democratic convention and a good GOP convention.  Had the Democrats been able to hold a decent convention,  Kerry might have won and had the Dems could have had a Senate that was unchanged or even ganed a seat had Vitter lost the runoff in Louisiana.  (Yes I know there was no runoff in the 2004 LA Senate race, but that was just barely and a better Democratic campaign across the board would have.  Also the Dems instead of losing 3 House seats would have picked up 2 or 3 seats depending on whether Colorado requires a plurality or a majority in US House elections.  (With a stronger Dem showing Musgrave would have only gotten a plurality in Colorado 4 instead of the majority she did in real life and Matsunaka would certainly have picked up most of the 4% of the vote for Green Party in the runoff.

Um, this topic is about South Carolina.
Logged
Grad Students are the Worst
Alcon
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29691
United States


View Profile
« Reply #44 on: June 27, 2005, 06:17:48 pm »
Ignore

My *guess* for SC (at the moment and presuming that Edwards isn't Kerry's VP pick. If he is the Dems gain in rural SC) is about 52% for Bush and 45% for Kerry.

Off just a bit, eh? Smiley

Just a bit indeed considering where the polls were in early July 2004.  If the election had been held then instead of November, Kerry would have won.  Unfortunately for Kerry he had the double debacle of a bad Democratic convention and a good GOP convention.  Had the Democrats been able to hold a decent convention,  Kerry might have won and had the Dems could have had a Senate that was unchanged or even ganed a seat had Vitter lost the runoff in Louisiana.  (Yes I know there was no runoff in the 2004 LA Senate race, but that was just barely and a better Democratic campaign across the board would have.  Also the Dems instead of losing 3 House seats would have picked up 2 or 3 seats depending on whether Colorado requires a plurality or a majority in US House elections.  (With a stronger Dem showing Musgrave would have only gotten a plurality in Colorado 4 instead of the majority she did in real life and Matsunaka would certainly have picked up most of the 4% of the vote for Green Party in the runoff.

Um, this topic is about South Carolina.

He's talking about the south in general, obviously.
Logged

n/c
A18
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 23836
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

View Profile
« Reply #45 on: June 27, 2005, 08:38:03 pm »
Ignore

And Al's prediction was about South Carolina.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines