Bush +15 in South Carolina
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 11:45:48 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
  Bush +15 in South Carolina
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Bush +15 in South Carolina  (Read 29654 times)
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,609
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: July 04, 2004, 08:45:06 AM »

Yeah, but the 'Upper South' is less religious than the Deep South- and more prosperous. Smith lost the Upper South largely for economic reasons.

If you believe that you'll believe anything
Logged
AuH2O
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,239


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: July 04, 2004, 12:44:59 PM »

Keep in mind, I live in the Upper South... you're just a dork that looks at numbers all day for politics in a country you don't even reside in...
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: July 04, 2004, 01:09:39 PM »

Keep in mind, I live in the Upper South... you're just a dork that looks at numbers all day for politics in a country you don't even reside in...

Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,609
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: July 04, 2004, 03:02:26 PM »

Keep in mind, I live in the Upper South... you're just a dork that looks at numbers all day for politics in a country you don't even reside in...

Responding to this would put me on your level
Logged
AuH2O
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,239


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: July 04, 2004, 05:00:20 PM »

On the level of someone with a life? No, I think it's too late for that in your case.

Are you even British, or did you immigrate there from Africa or something?
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,010


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: July 04, 2004, 06:10:07 PM »

On the level of someone with a life? No, I think it's too late for that in your case.

Are you even British, or did you immigrate there from Africa or something?

I'll have to interject that claiming to 'have a life' IN a post on this board is pretty hilarious.
Logged
AuH2O
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,239


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: July 04, 2004, 06:14:52 PM »

Fair enough, but everything is relative...
Logged
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,410
Timor-Leste


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: July 04, 2004, 07:28:51 PM »

On the level of someone with a life? No, I think it's too late for that in your case.

Are you even British, or did you immigrate there from Africa or something?

*chalks this up in case I have to do any debating with you*
Logged
AuH2O
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,239


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: July 04, 2004, 07:40:53 PM »

Don't worry, it would be a quick debate and you would be on the losing side. Few years back I was one of the better debaters in the state of VA...
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,609
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: July 05, 2004, 06:09:27 AM »

Are you even British, or did you immigrate there from Africa or something?

Is this Enoch Powell's ghost I see before me?
Logged
AuH2O
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,239


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: July 05, 2004, 09:53:02 AM »

I'll take that as a yes. At least give me props for perception... then again, most communists in Britain are of foreign descent. Not Livingstone, of course...
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,609
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: July 05, 2004, 01:13:43 PM »

I'll take that as a yes. At least give me props for perception... then again, most communists in Britain are of foreign descent. Not Livingstone, of course...

I'm white actually
Logged
AuH2O
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,239


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: July 05, 2004, 01:25:37 PM »

I'll take it not of the Christian variety...
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,609
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: July 05, 2004, 01:27:37 PM »

I'll take it not of the Christian variety...

I am a Christian
Logged
AuH2O
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,239


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: July 05, 2004, 03:14:42 PM »

By what definition?
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: June 26, 2005, 10:59:32 AM »

My *guess* for SC (at the moment and presuming that Edwards isn't Kerry's VP pick. If he is the Dems gain in rural SC) is about 52% for Bush and 45% for Kerry.

Off just a bit, eh? Smiley
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,157
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: June 27, 2005, 02:48:31 AM »

My *guess* for SC (at the moment and presuming that Edwards isn't Kerry's VP pick. If he is the Dems gain in rural SC) is about 52% for Bush and 45% for Kerry.

Off just a bit, eh? Smiley

Just a bit indeed considering where the polls were in early July 2004.  If the election had been held then instead of November, Kerry would have won.  Unfortunately for Kerry he had the double debacle of a bad Democratic convention and a good GOP convention.  Had the Democrats been able to hold a decent convention,  Kerry might have won and had the Dems could have had a Senate that was unchanged or even ganed a seat had Vitter lost the runoff in Louisiana.  (Yes I know there was no runoff in the 2004 LA Senate race, but that was just barely and a better Democratic campaign across the board would have.  Also the Dems instead of losing 3 House seats would have picked up 2 or 3 seats depending on whether Colorado requires a plurality or a majority in US House elections.  (With a stronger Dem showing Musgrave would have only gotten a plurality in Colorado 4 instead of the majority she did in real life and Matsunaka would certainly have picked up most of the 4% of the vote for Green Party in the runoff.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: June 27, 2005, 12:23:15 PM »

My *guess* for SC (at the moment and presuming that Edwards isn't Kerry's VP pick. If he is the Dems gain in rural SC) is about 52% for Bush and 45% for Kerry.

Off just a bit, eh? Smiley

Just a bit indeed considering where the polls were in early July 2004.  If the election had been held then instead of November, Kerry would have won.  Unfortunately for Kerry he had the double debacle of a bad Democratic convention and a good GOP convention.  Had the Democrats been able to hold a decent convention,  Kerry might have won and had the Dems could have had a Senate that was unchanged or even ganed a seat had Vitter lost the runoff in Louisiana.  (Yes I know there was no runoff in the 2004 LA Senate race, but that was just barely and a better Democratic campaign across the board would have.  Also the Dems instead of losing 3 House seats would have picked up 2 or 3 seats depending on whether Colorado requires a plurality or a majority in US House elections.  (With a stronger Dem showing Musgrave would have only gotten a plurality in Colorado 4 instead of the majority she did in real life and Matsunaka would certainly have picked up most of the 4% of the vote for Green Party in the runoff.

That's a lot of ifs.  Smiley
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: June 27, 2005, 05:53:38 PM »

My *guess* for SC (at the moment and presuming that Edwards isn't Kerry's VP pick. If he is the Dems gain in rural SC) is about 52% for Bush and 45% for Kerry.

Off just a bit, eh? Smiley

Just a bit indeed considering where the polls were in early July 2004.  If the election had been held then instead of November, Kerry would have won.  Unfortunately for Kerry he had the double debacle of a bad Democratic convention and a good GOP convention.  Had the Democrats been able to hold a decent convention,  Kerry might have won and had the Dems could have had a Senate that was unchanged or even ganed a seat had Vitter lost the runoff in Louisiana.  (Yes I know there was no runoff in the 2004 LA Senate race, but that was just barely and a better Democratic campaign across the board would have.  Also the Dems instead of losing 3 House seats would have picked up 2 or 3 seats depending on whether Colorado requires a plurality or a majority in US House elections.  (With a stronger Dem showing Musgrave would have only gotten a plurality in Colorado 4 instead of the majority she did in real life and Matsunaka would certainly have picked up most of the 4% of the vote for Green Party in the runoff.

Um, this topic is about South Carolina.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,867
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: June 27, 2005, 06:17:48 PM »

My *guess* for SC (at the moment and presuming that Edwards isn't Kerry's VP pick. If he is the Dems gain in rural SC) is about 52% for Bush and 45% for Kerry.

Off just a bit, eh? Smiley

Just a bit indeed considering where the polls were in early July 2004.  If the election had been held then instead of November, Kerry would have won.  Unfortunately for Kerry he had the double debacle of a bad Democratic convention and a good GOP convention.  Had the Democrats been able to hold a decent convention,  Kerry might have won and had the Dems could have had a Senate that was unchanged or even ganed a seat had Vitter lost the runoff in Louisiana.  (Yes I know there was no runoff in the 2004 LA Senate race, but that was just barely and a better Democratic campaign across the board would have.  Also the Dems instead of losing 3 House seats would have picked up 2 or 3 seats depending on whether Colorado requires a plurality or a majority in US House elections.  (With a stronger Dem showing Musgrave would have only gotten a plurality in Colorado 4 instead of the majority she did in real life and Matsunaka would certainly have picked up most of the 4% of the vote for Green Party in the runoff.

Um, this topic is about South Carolina.

He's talking about the south in general, obviously.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: June 27, 2005, 08:38:03 PM »

And Al's prediction was about South Carolina.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.042 seconds with 15 queries.