The Hill: Hagel low on cash on hand, raising retirement issue
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 12:24:12 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  The Hill: Hagel low on cash on hand, raising retirement issue
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The Hill: Hagel low on cash on hand, raising retirement issue  (Read 974 times)
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 30, 2007, 05:42:27 AM »

By Aaron Blake

Sen. Chuck Hagel’s (R-Neb.) year-end financial filing shows that he raised just $80,000 for his campaign committee in the final three months of 2006, bringing his cash on hand to $140,000 from $110,000.

As of his third-quarter filing, Hagel had the least cash on hand of the 33 senators up for reelection in 2008. The potential presidential candidate’s most recent filing shows he increased his campaign fundraising over the $20,000 he raised in the third quarter.

Political observers often use fundraising and cash-on-hand figures to speculate about whether members of Congress intend to seek reelection. The senator with the second-least cash after the third quarter, Sen. Wayne Allard (R-Colo.), is thus far the only one to announce he will not run again.

Unlike Allard, who was one of Democrats’ top three targets, Hagel appears unlikely to face a serious Senate challenge in 2008. He defeated now-Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) with 56 percent of the vote in 1996 and cruised to reelection in 2002 with 83 percent against token Democratic opposition.

At the same time, he has left open the possibility that he would retire, whether or not he would seek the presidency. Last week, he rebuffed a report that said he has assured the National Republican Senatorial Committee that he will seek reelection.

Spokesman Mike Buttry said Hagel’s campaign financial filings offer no clue about his future plans and emphasized Hagel’s fundraising through his political action committee, which raised more than $400,000 during the last cycle.

“I wouldn’t read anything into that,” Buttry said. “Sen. Hagel’s focus last year was on raising and contributing money from his PAC.”

Hagel recently has drawn attention for his harsh evaluation of the progress being made in Iraq. He is one of two Republican senators to sign on to a non-binding Democratic resolution criticizing President Bush’s plan to send 21,500 additional troops to Iraq.

http://www.hillnews.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/013007/hagel.html
Logged
Padfoot
padfoot714
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,532
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 30, 2007, 07:59:01 AM »

With such a paltry amount of cash how can he even begin to think about a presidential run, let alone another go at the Senate.  It seems odd that he would retire though given his relatively young age (he'll be 62 in 2008 which puts him just below the current average age) and the fact that he has only served two terms.  If he does retire, would Democrats have any chance of winning this seat?  Who would run from both sides?
Logged
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 30, 2007, 08:08:06 AM »

Its thought that Omaha Mayor Mike Fahey and Scott Kleeb could be Democratic candidates.  The Republicans could run Congressman Lee Terry or Tom Osbourne.  Though former Governor Mike Johanns would seem to be the obvious candidate. 
Logged
Bacon King
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,830
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.63, S: -9.49

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 30, 2007, 08:35:05 AM »

With such a paltry amount of cash how can he even begin to think about a presidential run, let alone another go at the Senate. 

IIRC, you must start a new campaign commitee when moving from one office to another. The only time that campaign commitee funds transfer over is between House and Senate elections.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 30, 2007, 10:08:03 AM »

Didn't Hagel confirm that he is not seeking re-election and will not run for President earlier this month?
Logged
JSojourner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,510
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -6.94

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 30, 2007, 10:45:20 AM »

Its thought that Omaha Mayor Mike Fahey and Scott Kleeb could be Democratic candidates.  The Republicans could run Congressman Lee Terry or Tom Osbourne.  Though former Governor Mike Johanns would seem to be the obvious candidate. 

Osborne would be unbeatable.
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 30, 2007, 01:25:21 PM »

he is too much of an attention whore not to run again.

Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 30, 2007, 01:26:34 PM »

Sen. Chuck Hagel’s (R-Neb.) year-end financial filing shows that he raised just $80,000 for his campaign committee in the final three months of 2006, bringing his cash on hand to $140,000 from $110,000.

Perhaps I'm missing something, but what crazy campaign math is involved in which 110 + 80 = 140?
Logged
bullmoose88
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,515


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: January 30, 2007, 01:30:00 PM »

Sen. Chuck Hagel’s (R-Neb.) year-end financial filing shows that he raised just $80,000 for his campaign committee in the final three months of 2006, bringing his cash on hand to $140,000 from $110,000.

Perhaps I'm missing something, but what crazy campaign math is involved in which 110 + 80 = 140?


Probably some costs too (Staff etc)
Logged
HardRCafé
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,364
Italy
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: January 30, 2007, 02:39:09 PM »


Like last time?
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: January 30, 2007, 02:48:42 PM »

Sen. Chuck Hagel’s (R-Neb.) year-end financial filing shows that he raised just $80,000 for his campaign committee in the final three months of 2006, bringing his cash on hand to $140,000 from $110,000.

Perhaps I'm missing something, but what crazy campaign math is involved in which 110 + 80 = 140?


Probably some costs too (Staff etc)

I suppose.

It's still worded badly, in my opinion. Tongue
Logged
JSojourner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,510
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -6.94

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: January 30, 2007, 06:19:57 PM »


Yep.  No democrat would ever beat him. 
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: January 30, 2007, 06:59:12 PM »


He wouldn't be running against a Republican this time.

But, I will hold out hope that the Republicans nominate a crazy person, allowing for Kleeb or Fahey to stand a chance.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.053 seconds with 11 queries.