MyDD: Oregon Senate: A Possible Challenger/Analysis
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 10:20:53 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  MyDD: Oregon Senate: A Possible Challenger/Analysis
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MyDD: Oregon Senate: A Possible Challenger/Analysis  (Read 1534 times)
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 11, 2007, 12:43:38 PM »



I've just heard a report on the radio that the DSCC is offering Representative Peter DeFazio (OR-04) support of up to $5,000,000 if he runs against Senator Gordon Smith.  Although DeFazio has said before that he will not run, apparently he is still considering it.  I've heard that the DSCC has given him a deadline to decide- a deadline that is approaching soon.
For those who don't know Peter, he is a member of both the Progressive and Out of Iraq Caucuses.

From Open Secrets:
Gordon Smith
2001-2006 Total Receipts: $9,350,699
2001-2006 Total Spent: $7,118,471
Cash on Hand: $2,193,310
Debts: $1,519,648
Date of last report: December 31, 2006
First elected: 1996
Next election: 2008

Peter Defazio
2005-2006 Total Receipts: $793,123
2005-2006 Total Spent: $753,011
Cash on Hand: $105,036
Debts: $0
Date of last report: December 31, 2006
First elected: 1986
Next election: 2006

Peter DeFazio is thought by many to be the strongest potential challenger to Smith.  In 2006 he won every county in his district, including fairly conservative rural areas.  He is a fairly populist Democrat, and it is thought that he could appeal to people from outside of the Portland-Eugene axis better than most of the other potential contenders.

In 2002, Smith faced Bill Bradbury, our excellent Democratic Secretary of State, who was not the strongest candidate.  Smith beat him in a very good year for Republicans by 712,287 to 501,898, of 1,267,221 votes cast, or 56.2% to 39.6%.

In the 1996 special election that saw Ron Wyden (D) beat Gordon Smith to replace Bob Packwood, of 1,181,650 votes cast, Wyden beat Smith 571,739, or 48.4%, to 553,519, or 46.8%.  In the 1996 general election, Gordon Smith beat Tom Bruggere (D) in the election to replace the retiring Mark Hatfield.  Smith received 677,336 and Bruggere 624,370 of the 1,360,234 votes, or 49.8% to 45.9%.  That was the last time that Smith ran during a Presidential year, which, IIRC, was a good year for Demcorats.

Here's a county map of Oregon:
http://county-map.digital-topo-maps.com/ oregon.shtml
Here you can check out Congressional District maps:
http://nationalatlas.gov/printable/congr ess.html#or

Here's a primer for Oregon:
In Oregon, Democrats hold all six statewide elected positions in the state government, and all have been held by Democrats for many years.  We now narrowly (31-29) hold the state house, and we hold the state senate (19-11).  We have 4 out of 5 Congressional districts, all but the 2nd CD.  One of our senators is Ron Wyden, a Democrat from Portland, and our other senator is Gordon Smith, a Republican from Pendleton (Eastern Oregon).

Democrats depend on Multnomah and Lane counties for strong support, because that is where Portland and Eugene are, repsectively.  Traditionally, Benton, Clatsop, Columbia, Coos, Hood River, Lane, Lincoln, Morrow, Multnomah, and Wasco County have had Democratic registration advantages, though it is often difficult to elect Democrats outside of Lane and Multnomah counties.  Clackamas County (my home county), is a swing county, with a republican advantage, and rural Clackamas and Marion counties are part of the bible belt of western Oregon.  Marion County and Washington County have had Republican advantages, with Washington County as a traditional Republican stronghold, but Democrats are now taking over the Washington County in state and national elections.  Most counties in the 1st and 3rd CDs are winnable, some in the 4th and 5th, and a couple in the 2nd, but most of the rest is deep red.  However, in 1998 Gov. Kitzhaber won all but one county, and lost that by but a few hundred votes.  Ron Wyden crushed his last opponent, too.

Significantly, when Wyden beat Smith, he won Benton County (by 2,300), Clackamas County (by 3,000), Clatsop County (by 1,500), Columbia County (by 1,001), Lincoln County (by 1,800), Lane County (by 13,300), Multnomah County (by 80,600), Tillamook County (by 600), and Washington County (by 1,100).  Smith won Coos County (by 3,100), Hood River County (by 56), Marion County (by 5,300), Polk County (by 1,100), Wasco County (by 167), and Yamhill County (by 2,900).

When Smith beat Tom Bruggere in the general election of the same year (1996), Bruggere won Benton County (by 2,400), Lincoln County (by 1,100), Lane County (by 22,400), and Multnomah County (by 73,600).  Smith won Clackamas County (by 8,000), Clatsop County (by 600), Columbia County (by 400), Coos County (by 2,600), Hood River County (by 500), Marion County (by 15,300), Polk County (by 4,400), Tillamook County (by 450), Wasco County (by 1,000), Washington County (by 8,800), and Yamhill County (by 5,600).

In 2002, when Bill Bradbury faced Smith, Bradbury won only Multnomah County (by 42,850).  It was a tough year.  Smith won Benton County (by 350), Clackamas County (by 32,000), Clatsop County (by 2,100), Columbia County (by 3,400), Coos County (by 5,250), Hood River County (by 1,050), Lane County (by 1,800), Lincoln County (by 1,700), Marion County (by 27,300) Polk County (by 7,100), Tillamook County (by 2,100), Wasco County (by 2,700), Washington County (by 32,200), and Yamhill County (by 10,150).

Conversely, in 2004, Ron Wyden demolished Republican challenger Al King.  Wyden won Benton County (by 14,400), Clackamas County (by 43,200), Clatsop County (by 6,900), Columbia County (by 8,400), Coos County (by 5,200), Hood River County (by 3,650), Lane County (by 62,950), Lincoln COunty (by 6,900), Marion County (by 25,850), Multnomah County (by 208,900), Polk County (by 6,000), Tillamook County (by 4,150), Wasco County (by 4,150), Washington County (by 72,000), and Yamhill County (by 6,800), and several other counties that rarely go blue, and severely narrowed some deep red counties.

In 2004, Peter DeFazio faced Jim Feldkamp for the 4th district, and Defazio won every county except Douglas, which he lost by 179 votes.  His district has all or part of Benton, Coos, Curry, Douglas, Josephine, Lane, and Linn counties.  In 2006, DeFazio won them all, including Douglas, which he won by 692 votes.  He swept the counties in 1996, 1998, 2000, and 2002, as well (previous records aren't available at the SOS website).  This is no easy task.  I've been told that the 4th is the most difficult district that any of our (Oregon) Democrats has, though we have a deep bench there (although I think my home district, the 5th, could be as tough).
DeFazio has a proven record of winning in base territory, in swing areas, and pretty red ones, too.  He bridges the urban-rural divide.  Short of former governor Kitzhaber, who has repeatedly made clear he has no intention of getting back into electoral politics, Peter appears to be the best candidate to rile up our base in the Portland and Eugene areas, step into those swing areas in places like Coos, Polk, and Clackamas counties, and even the deep red areas like Douglas and Jo counties, and really take it to Gordon Smith.  If we can get DeFazio to run, we will have a serious race on our hands.
With high turnout in a presidential year, the numbers show that across the state, we can take Smith down, if we have a strong candidate that can appeal outside of the Portland-Eugene axis.  We need a candidate that can pull votes out of the small towns and rural areas, not just the big, liberal cities (and Bend and Salem, two of the biggest cities, are not very liberal).
2008 should not be so rough a year as 2002, in fact, it may be almost as good as 2006, if we are not making any progress in Iraq (which, if we are still there, we won't be).  As well, Oregon Democrats are seeing red right now.  Beating Gordon Smith would be the most likely and most pleasing accomplishment that many of us could desire.  With a strong candidate, the money will be there, unlike in 2002.  But 2008 won't be like 2002 at all.  In 2008, we can do it.

All election results were derived from the Oregon SOS website: http://www.sos.state.or.us/elections/

http://www.mydd.com/story/2007/3/9/0288/91697
Logged
Deano963
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,866


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 11, 2007, 12:56:40 PM »



I've just heard a report on the radio that the DSCC is offering Representative Peter DeFazio (OR-04) support of up to $5,000,000 if he runs against Senator Gordon Smith.  Although DeFazio has said before that he will not run, apparently he is still considering it.  I've heard that the DSCC has given him a deadline to decide- a deadline that is approaching soon.


I'm so glad to see that Schumer and the DSCC are so agressively going after vulnerable GOP incumbents and recruiting challengers this early. I really hope DeFazio runs.

Is Khitzhaber interested in the race at all?
Logged
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 11, 2007, 03:44:22 PM »



I've just heard a report on the radio that the DSCC is offering Representative Peter DeFazio (OR-04) support of up to $5,000,000 if he runs against Senator Gordon Smith.  Although DeFazio has said before that he will not run, apparently he is still considering it.  I've heard that the DSCC has given him a deadline to decide- a deadline that is approaching soon.


I'm so glad to see that Schumer and the DSCC are so agressively going after vulnerable GOP incumbents and recruiting challengers this early. I really hope DeFazio runs.

Is Khitzhaber interested in the race at all?

I think he has denied any interest in the race - he also had a chance in 2002 and declined; he probably could have beaten Smith then.
Logged
JSojourner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,510
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -6.94

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 11, 2007, 11:21:21 PM »

I always have mixed feelings about races like this.  The Republican party needs dissenting voices like Gordon Smith.  I hated to see Linc Chafee go.  The more moderates the party loses, the more it becomes less of a Republican Party and more of an "American Theo-Fascist" Party.  I hate to see that.

There have been so many great, honorable Republicans in our history.  Smith wouldn't be my cup of tea, but he can be reasoned with.

Still, Democrats have to strike when and where they can.  Surely, Republicans (usually the tougher political players) will not hesitate to do so.
Logged
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 11, 2007, 11:48:59 PM »

Well, seems like Oregon needs to get rid of Gordon just like Washington got rid of Gorton. Though I do agree with JSojourner... I wish there was a way to keep the moderate republicans while getting rid of the radicals
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 12, 2007, 10:39:47 PM »

Gordon Smith isn't a moderate.
Logged
Rob
Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,277
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 12, 2007, 10:41:41 PM »


^^^^^^

DeFazio would beat him, too. Let's hope he runs.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,707


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: March 12, 2007, 10:47:04 PM »

I wouldn't worry too much about defeating moderate Republicans in Congress, since there aren't any. 
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: March 12, 2007, 10:50:04 PM »

I wonder if this report is true? Pete DeFazio is one the best members of the House. He is fairly similar to Sherrod Brown in his focus on economic populism and standing up for working people.  But then he's also a little like Russ Feingold in terms of being a budget hawk and stridently anti-Iraq War. 

It would be a hell of a race, and I think DeFazio could win.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.052 seconds with 12 queries.