Is homosexuality immoral?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 12:20:38 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Is homosexuality immoral?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Poll
Question: Is homosexuality immoral?
#1
Yes (D)
 
#2
Yes (R)
 
#3
Yes (I/O)
 
#4
No (D)
 
#5
No (R)
 
#6
No (I/O)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 61

Author Topic: Is homosexuality immoral?  (Read 5301 times)
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,597


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 18, 2007, 10:23:23 PM »

Did you agree with the sentiments expressed by General Pace about homosexuality being immoral?
Logged
Undisguised Sockpuppet
Straha
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787
Uruguay


Political Matrix
E: 6.52, S: 2.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 18, 2007, 10:25:54 PM »

No I don't.
Logged
adam
Captain Vlad
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,922


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -5.04

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 18, 2007, 11:46:30 PM »

No (R).

I would like one reasonable argument to the contrary that isn't founded on religious principles.
Logged
Richard
Richius
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,369


Political Matrix
E: 8.40, S: 2.80

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 18, 2007, 11:46:49 PM »

It probably is, but it is fun.  And so are many things that is verboten.
Logged
Smash255
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,453


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 18, 2007, 11:47:40 PM »

nope
Logged
Dr. Cynic
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,436
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.11, S: -6.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 19, 2007, 12:06:54 AM »

It is as immoral as heterosexuality or bisexuality... The point to be made is that morality is relative to the individual.
Logged
Joe Biden 2020
BushOklahoma
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,921
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.77, S: 3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 19, 2007, 06:25:02 AM »
« Edited: March 19, 2007, 06:26:55 AM by Richardson/Vilsack 2008 »

Yes (D) -- Marriage is designed to reproduce and it is physically impossible to reproduce without egg and sperm.  You can't have sperm and sperm or egg and egg to reproduce.  One may argue for invetro fertilization, but thats not reproduction inside the marriage.
Logged
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,846
Ireland, Republic of


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: March 19, 2007, 06:29:17 AM »

Yes (D) -- Marriage is designed to reproduce and it is physically impossible to reproduce without egg and sperm.  You can't have sperm and sperm or egg and egg to reproduce.  One may argue for invetro fertilization, but thats not reproduction inside the marriage.

Who said anything about marriage, or reproduction?
Logged
KEmperor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,454
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: -0.05

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: March 19, 2007, 06:29:44 AM »

No (R).

I would like one reasonable argument to the contrary that isn't founded on religious principles.

It is contrary to the very nature of life-creation.  In fact it is an anti-life position.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: March 19, 2007, 06:46:33 AM »

Yes (D) -- Marriage is designed to reproduce and it is physically impossible to reproduce without egg and sperm.  You can't have sperm and sperm or egg and egg to reproduce.  One may argue for invetro fertilization, but thats not reproduction inside the marriage.

Who said anything about marriage, or reproduction?

Correct. Marriage/Reproduction should not be mixed up with morality or immorality of homosexuality. Evolution made it clear that not all humans are homosexual (about 90%) and therefore the 90% are able to reproduce the human species. If we were all gay, the reproduction issue would matter.

As for the question: No (D) - I´m a strong supporter of gay rights.
Logged
afleitch
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,861


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: March 19, 2007, 08:34:52 AM »

Yes (D) -- Marriage is designed to reproduce and it is physically impossible to reproduce without egg and sperm.  You can't have sperm and sperm or egg and egg to reproduce.  One may argue for invetro fertilization, but thats not reproduction inside the marriage.

Who said anything about marriage, or reproduction?

^^^^^^

I'm a tad flummoxed as to what marriage has do do with anything.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: March 19, 2007, 10:34:51 AM »

No (R).

I would like one reasonable argument to the contrary that isn't founded on religious principles.

It is contrary to the very nature of life-creation.  In fact it is an anti-life position.

By that logic, not having children is immoral.  So is not having sex at every opportunity, because you're turning down the potential for life (of course, this argument still is going to appeal to some men, but whatever Tongue).  Not being pro-"life creation" (since when was that immoral?) is different from being anti-"life creation."  Besides, there are already plenty of people on earth.

In any case, No (I).
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: March 19, 2007, 10:39:24 AM »

Yes (D) -- Marriage is designed to reproduce and it is physically impossible to reproduce without egg and sperm.  You can't have sperm and sperm or egg and egg to reproduce.  One may argue for invetro fertilization, but thats not reproduction inside the marriage.

wow i cant believe opebo hasnt told you to get over to the religious party.
Logged
Joe Biden 2020
BushOklahoma
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,921
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.77, S: 3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: March 19, 2007, 10:43:19 AM »

Yes (D) -- Marriage is designed to reproduce and it is physically impossible to reproduce without egg and sperm.  You can't have sperm and sperm or egg and egg to reproduce.  One may argue for invetro fertilization, but thats not reproduction inside the marriage.

wow i cant believe opebo hasnt told you to get over to the religious party.

Cue opebo in 3.... 2....
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: March 19, 2007, 11:04:30 AM »

Did you agree with the sentiments expressed by General Pace about homosexuality being immoral?

Having doubts about yourself, again?!  Wink
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: March 19, 2007, 11:06:35 AM »

Did you agree with the sentiments expressed by General Pace about homosexuality being immoral?

Having doubts about yourself, again?!  Wink

Err, what?

If you're going to make a lame "you're gay" joke, at least attempt coherency.  Tongue
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: March 19, 2007, 11:18:11 AM »

Did you agree with the sentiments expressed by General Pace about homosexuality being immoral?

Having doubts about yourself, again?!  Wink

Err, what?

If you're going to make a lame "you're gay" joke, at least attempt coherency.  Tongue

Well, I have been up for 36  hours straight, but I don't see how I was incoherent.  Learn me something about sentence structure, will you?
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: March 19, 2007, 11:19:22 AM »

Did you agree with the sentiments expressed by General Pace about homosexuality being immoral?

Having doubts about yourself, again?!  Wink

Err, what?

If you're going to make a lame "you're gay" joke, at least attempt coherency.  Tongue

Well, I have been up for 36  hours straight, but I don't see how I was incoherent.  Learn me something about sentence structure, will you?

Thirty-six hours?  I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, since we've all been there.  Get some damn sleep, man!  Smiley
Logged
GOP = Terrorists
Progress
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,667


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: March 19, 2007, 11:32:57 AM »

Yes (D) -- Marriage is designed to reproduce and it is physically impossible to reproduce without egg and sperm.  You can't have sperm and sperm or egg and egg to reproduce.  One may argue for invetro fertilization, but thats not reproduction inside the marriage.

If a woman is barren is it immoral for her to have sex?
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: March 19, 2007, 11:38:24 AM »

Thirty-six hours?  I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, since we've all been there.  Get some damn sleep, man!  Smiley

Can't.  It's only 11:30am in Houston and we're in the middle of User-Acceptance-Testing (UAT) for Release 1 of a global enterprise integration effort.  I'm supposed to be in London gearing up for Release 2.  As it is, I'm in London gearing up for Release 2 while baby-sitting Release 1.

The Hagen-Daus Belgian-Chocolate has been outstanding, though.  There’s one right outside my hotel.  Of course, I’ll have to wait until I can leave work.
Logged
adam
Captain Vlad
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,922


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -5.04

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: March 19, 2007, 01:30:13 PM »

No (R).

I would like one reasonable argument to the contrary that isn't founded on religious principles.

It is contrary to the very nature of life-creation.  In fact it is an anti-life position.

I would argue that stating the purpose of relationships and sexuality to be stricty procreational, is still a religiously based position.
Logged
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: March 19, 2007, 01:44:59 PM »

Not in itself no. The thing is with me I consider any monogimous and committed 'love' relationship between two humans, either at or above the age of consent be it heterosexual, homosexual or bisexual, to be moral

I consider adultery and infidelity immoral

Dave
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: March 19, 2007, 01:48:10 PM »

Yes (D) -- Marriage is designed to reproduce and it is physically impossible to reproduce without egg and sperm.  You can't have sperm and sperm or egg and egg to reproduce.  One may argue for invetro fertilization, but thats not reproduction inside the marriage.

Is being infertile or celebate immoral then, as well?
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,083
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: March 19, 2007, 02:36:09 PM »

Yes (D) -- Marriage is designed to reproduce and it is physically impossible to reproduce without egg and sperm.  You can't have sperm and sperm or egg and egg to reproduce.  One may argue for invetro fertilization, but thats not reproduction inside the marriage.

wow i cant believe opebo hasnt told you to get over to the religious party.

Cue opebo in 3.... 2....

You haven't actually answered the earlier question on this post; i.e. "Who said anything about marriage, or reproduction?"
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: March 19, 2007, 03:07:02 PM »

Yes (R) - althought I understand this is my personal belief rooted mostly in my religious beliefs, and that reasonable people can disagree.  Although I have a feeling it is the left that urges that we accept them, I am saying that everyone is entitled to their own opinion
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.065 seconds with 14 queries.