If you could change the winner of an election...

[PBrunsel]

Alton Parker in 1904, the greatest president we never had.

[Lief 🗽]

Alton Parker in 1904, the greatest president we never had.

Really? I would have thought you'd be a pretty big TR fan.

[Kaine for Senate '18]

Including primaries:
1900: Bryan
1908: Bryan
1920: Cox
1924: LaFollette
1928: Davis
1968: Humphrey
1972: Humphrey
1976: Jackson
1980: Kennedy
1984: Askew
1988: Gore
2000: Gore
2004: Lieberman
2008: Biden

[frihetsivrare]

1912- Taft
1964- Goldwater
1992- Perot

[The Duke]

The five I'd most want to change.

John Adams in 1800
John Q. Adams in 1828
Teddy Roosevelt in 1912
Thomas Dewey in 1944
John McCain in 2000

I think I'll stick with my answer except for Dewey in 1944.  I'd still prefer Dewey to FDR, but in retrospect I'd like to take Clay over Jackson in 1832 even more.  Yes, I've already picked Adams over Jackson, but I'd like to pick against Jackson twice this time because I hate him that much.

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

The one I'd most care to change is 1844 to this map:

Clay: 179 EV
Polk: 96 EV

It wouldn't have taken much to produce this map either, just a 2% swing.

[Verily]

1980 to Anderson.

Second choice is Clay in 1824.

[Associate Justice PiT]

JQA in 1828
Tilden in 1876
Hughes in 1916
Cox in 1920
Nixon in 1960

[You kip if you want to...]

1988 to Dukakis
2000 to Gore (or, atleast the GOP primary winner to McCain)

[Psychic Octopus]

2004 to Kerry, then Obama will become president later, not at this critical moment in our history.

[bhouston79]

My first choice would have to be 2000 from Bush to Gore, followed closely by 2004 from Bush to Kerry.  Bush has by far been the worst President that we have had in modern times.

[Psychic Octopus]

It'd be ssmarter to change 2000 to Gore because Kerry Wins in 2004 = Republican Victory In 2008, as kerry would take the blame for the horrid last 4 years and financial crisis.

[pbrower2a]

Cox 1920

Humphrey 1968

Ford 1976

Gore 2000

[RIP Robert H Bork]

1992 of course.

[Psychic Octopus]

Cox 2000

Humphrey 1968

Ford 1976

Gore 2000

You mean Cox 1920 right?

[pbrower2a]

Cox 2000

Humphrey 1968

Ford 1976

Gore 2000

Yes, indeed. I have since corrected my error.

You mean Cox 1920 right?

[Scam of God]

1920 to Cox
1972 to McGovern
1984 to Mondale.

[© tweed]

assuming I have to change it to a major party nominee, it has to be Gore2000 even though I probably wouldn't have voted for him... it would be nice to have that one back

[Scam of God]

assuming I have to change it to a major party nominee, it has to be Gore2000 even though I probably wouldn't have voted for him... it would be nice to have that one back

I hate the Mushy Middle.

[© tweed]

assuming I have to change it to a major party nominee, it has to be Gore2000 even though I probably wouldn't have voted for him... it would be nice to have that one back

I hate the Mushy Middle.

what does that mean

[Scam of God]

assuming I have to change it to a major party nominee, it has to be Gore2000 even though I probably wouldn't have voted for him... it would be nice to have that one back

I hate the Mushy Middle.

what does that mean

Gore bent over backwards to please the mindless droning 'centrists' roughly equivalent to your social and economic scores, but "BAW I WUBZ ME SOME RALPH NADER BAW!"

[© tweed]

obviously you haven't been following my career here very closely.  not that you have any moral obligation to do so, but before you draw up a thesis based on 67 assumptions, you probably should do some research


I would have abstained from voting Gore *because* he did so much of what you just said (along with general distaste for the Clinton admin post-'94), not in spite of it

[Scam of God]

obviously you haven't been following my career here very closely.  not that you have any moral obligation to do so, but before you draw up a thesis based on 67 assumptions, you probably should do some research

Nah. Stereotypical people are stereotypical.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

What great logic: let's blame the guy with a job-not-worth-a-bucket-of-warm-piss for his boss' failings.

I'm sure you're an upscale bleeding heart that's realistic enough not to want to be taxed into oblivion (hence your economic score), but too idealistic/stupid to vote for the 'lesser of two evils'.

Ugh, I'm done.

[© tweed]

I just realized why the other secularists don't like you

[Scam of God]

I just realized why the other secularists don't like you

Most All of the 'secularists' on this site are idiots. It's just that the religionists are so much worse.