US Presidents, Day 42: Clinton
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 04:12:40 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  US Presidents, Day 42: Clinton
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: US Presidents, Day 42: Clinton  (Read 3799 times)
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,073
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 11, 2007, 12:20:03 PM »



Bill Clinton
Democratic
1993-2001


Discuss his presidency.
Logged
Dr. Cynic
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,428
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.11, S: -6.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 11, 2007, 08:39:45 PM »

This should be fun...
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 11, 2007, 08:42:01 PM »

It's a little known fact that he's entirely responsible for the Civil War, America's loss in the War of 1812, and the Great Depression.
Logged
Dr. Cynic
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,428
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.11, S: -6.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 11, 2007, 09:04:58 PM »

Not to mention the moral decline of society with his wannabe Kennedyesque perversions.
Logged
Dr. Cynic
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,428
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.11, S: -6.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 11, 2007, 09:08:09 PM »

Many people hate him simply because he is a Democrat.

Lest we forget his ability to connect with the masses of people... Or maybe it's the fact that he could probably have run for President again and beaten anybody they threw at him... Maybe they hate him for his good economy... Maybe they just hate him because you never saw Republicans getting any "action".
Logged
Michael Z
Mike
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,288
Political Matrix
E: -5.88, S: -4.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 12, 2007, 11:27:47 AM »

Many people hate him simply because he is a Democrat.

Lest we forget his ability to connect with the masses of people... Or maybe it's the fact that he could probably have run for President again and beaten anybody they threw at him... Maybe they hate him for his good economy... Maybe they just hate him because you never saw Republicans getting any "action".

Well, for what it's worth, Ike was quite the dirty little rascal, apparently.
Logged
MaC
Milk_and_cereal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 12, 2007, 12:21:10 PM »

It's a little known fact that he's entirely responsible for the Civil War, America's loss in the War of 1812, and the Great Depression.

are you a dumb?  Everyone with a blue avatar knows that!  Tongue
Logged
Kevin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,424
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 12, 2007, 03:42:40 PM »

Did little about Bin Laden and his group, Overall in my opinion he was a pretty medicore President. 
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: April 12, 2007, 03:46:24 PM »

Did little about Bin Laden and his group

Just like someone else until 9/11 happened.
Logged
CPT MikeyMike
mikeymike
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,513
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.58, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: April 12, 2007, 06:38:14 PM »

Did little about Bin Laden and his group

Just like someone else until 9/11 happened.

Clinton had a better chance to get Bin Ladin - 8 years.

Clinton's only success was the ability to balance the budget.

Failure was weakening the morale of the military and inability to get Bin Ladin after the USS Cole attacks.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,708


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: April 12, 2007, 07:39:09 PM »

It's a little known fact that he's entirely responsible for the Civil War, America's loss in the War of 1812, and the Great Depression.

How dare you let him off the hook for Ceasar's death?
Logged
Robespierre's Jaw
Senator Conor Flynn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,129
Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -8.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: April 12, 2007, 09:39:33 PM »

William Jefferson Clinton was an alright President. He did get closer to Osama bin Laden than President George W. Bush ever has. During his eight years in the White House, Clinton was always had scandals on his doorstep and somehow managed to fight them off. As Clinton said when he was running for President in '92, 'I'll fight until the last dog dies!'.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: April 13, 2007, 10:38:57 AM »

A Rockefeller Republican, or perhaps slightly to the right of that.
Logged
bullmoose88
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,515


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: April 14, 2007, 12:03:57 AM »

I hated him while he was in office. Call it partisanship, call it a certain sort of jealous respect for the fact he was/is made out of teflon.

Anyways, with each passing day we have one of, if not THE, the worst presidents in our history in office, I miss Clinton's presidency.

The fact that there weren't more troubling issues during his terms than a simple bruha-ha-ha over fellatio (yes yes, perjury came later, but it was perjury over a BJ)...is rather telling. An achievement maybe.
Logged
Dr. Cynic
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,428
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.11, S: -6.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: April 14, 2007, 01:31:37 AM »

I hated him while he was in office. Call it partisanship, call it a certain sort of jealous respect for the fact he was/is made out of teflon.

Anyways, with each passing day we have one of, if not THE, the worst presidents in our history in office, I miss Clinton's presidency.

The fact that there weren't more troubling issues during his terms than a simple bruha-ha-ha over fellatio (yes yes, perjury came later, but it was perjury over a BJ)...is rather telling. An achievement maybe.

On the whole, Clinton was rather moderate... I think it came from some of the political Republicans feeling, for lack of a better word, impotent, because Bill had charisma. They realized Clinton could speak and connect with people, so they threw everything but the kitchen sink at him (Sound strategy, no?)

In the end, Bill will just be remembered as the President who got a happy ending in the Oval... Oh and he balanced the budget, but who gives a damn about that.
Logged
Rob
Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,277
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: April 14, 2007, 02:02:45 AM »

I still don't understand why Republicans hate him. Consider his accomplishments:

* Passed NAFTA, a trade agreement supported by the GOP
* Led the attack on the remnants of the social safety net, signing Republican-written welfare "reform" (and smirking that "the era of Big Government is over")
* Signed the Defense of Marriage Act banning same-sex marriage in an appeal to religious conservatives... and a vicious little jab at the gay activists who had supported him
* Fought for the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, expanding the federal death penalty and limiting prisoners' rights
* Favored wide use of American power abroad, with "interventions" in the Balkans; also laid the groundwork for the current debacle by calling for regime change in Iraq
* Made "balancing the budget" his top concern at the expense of social spending, following the counsel of conservative Wall Street advisors

And on, and on. Seriously, why do conservatives hate him? Were his wars not disastrous enough to gain their approval, or what? He would have been considered too far to the right to lead the Democratic ticket in earlier years. Actually, on balance he was a pretty dreadful President.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: April 14, 2007, 02:54:04 PM »

right wing hack
Logged
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,846
Ireland, Republic of


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: April 14, 2007, 05:52:48 PM »
« Edited: April 15, 2007, 04:05:20 AM by Gully Foyle »

I still don't understand why Republicans hate him. Consider his accomplishments:

* Passed NAFTA, a trade agreement supported by the GOP
* Led the attack on the remnants of the social safety net, signing Republican-written welfare "reform" (and smirking that "the era of Big Government is over")
* Signed the Defense of Marriage Act banning same-sex marriage in an appeal to religious conservatives... and a vicious little jab at the gay activists who had supported him
* Fought for the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, expanding the federal death penalty and limiting prisoners' rights
* Favored wide use of American power abroad, with "interventions" in the Balkans; also laid the groundwork for the current debacle by calling for regime change in Iraq
* Made "balancing the budget" his top concern at the expense of social spending, following the counsel of conservative Wall Street advisors

And on, and on. Seriously, why do conservatives hate him? Were his wars not disastrous enough to gain their approval, or what? He would have been considered too far to the right to lead the Democratic ticket in earlier years. Actually, on balance he was a pretty dreadful President.

Because of the "D", and that huge right-wing smear campaign obviously - after 12 years of laziness republicans were too used to their little arrangements in Washington even if the silly little electorate had a different opinion on that.

And I always laugh when someone calls Clinton "left-wing" though he gets alot of credit from me for his role of Northern Ireland and his foreign policy. By default the best US president since the War (not that that is hard or anything...)
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: April 14, 2007, 11:17:42 PM »

I still don't understand why Republicans hate him. Consider his accomplishments:

* Passed NAFTA, a trade agreement supported by the GOP
* Led the attack on the remnants of the social safety net, signing Republican-written welfare "reform" (and smirking that "the era of Big Government is over")
* Signed the Defense of Marriage Act banning same-sex marriage in an appeal to religious conservatives... and a vicious little jab at the gay activists who had supported him
* Fought for the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, expanding the federal death penalty and limiting prisoners' rights
* Favored wide use of American power abroad, with "interventions" in the Balkans; also laid the groundwork for the current debacle by calling for regime change in Iraq
* Made "balancing the budget" his top concern at the expense of social spending, following the counsel of conservative Wall Street advisors

And on, and on. Seriously, why do conservatives hate him? Were his wars not disastrous enough to gain their approval, or what? He would have been considered too far to the right to lead the Democratic ticket in earlier years. Actually, on balance he was a pretty dreadful President.

Because of the "D", and that huge right-wing smear campaign obviously - after 12 years of laziness republicans were too used to their little arrangements in Washington even if the silly little electorate had a different opinion on that.

And I always have when someone calls Clinton "left-wing" though he gets alot of credit from me for his role of Northern Ireland and his foreign policy. By default the best US president since the War (not that that is hard or anything...)

By "the War" you mean WWII, I assume? I'd probably agree with you.
Logged
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,846
Ireland, Republic of


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: April 15, 2007, 04:05:35 AM »

I still don't understand why Republicans hate him. Consider his accomplishments:

* Passed NAFTA, a trade agreement supported by the GOP
* Led the attack on the remnants of the social safety net, signing Republican-written welfare "reform" (and smirking that "the era of Big Government is over")
* Signed the Defense of Marriage Act banning same-sex marriage in an appeal to religious conservatives... and a vicious little jab at the gay activists who had supported him
* Fought for the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, expanding the federal death penalty and limiting prisoners' rights
* Favored wide use of American power abroad, with "interventions" in the Balkans; also laid the groundwork for the current debacle by calling for regime change in Iraq
* Made "balancing the budget" his top concern at the expense of social spending, following the counsel of conservative Wall Street advisors

And on, and on. Seriously, why do conservatives hate him? Were his wars not disastrous enough to gain their approval, or what? He would have been considered too far to the right to lead the Democratic ticket in earlier years. Actually, on balance he was a pretty dreadful President.

Because of the "D", and that huge right-wing smear campaign obviously - after 12 years of laziness republicans were too used to their little arrangements in Washington even if the silly little electorate had a different opinion on that.

And I always have when someone calls Clinton "left-wing" though he gets alot of credit from me for his role of Northern Ireland and his foreign policy. By default the best US president since the War (not that that is hard or anything...)

By "the War" you mean WWII, I assume? I'd probably agree with you.

Yes.
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,073
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: April 26, 2007, 12:51:00 PM »

During his eight years in the White House, Clinton was always had scandals on his doorstep and somehow managed to fight them off.

You call getting impeached fighting off scandals?  The only reason he wasn't removed from office before his 8 years was up is because of the insane loyalty of the Democrats in congress at that time.

Perhaps you're forgetting which party held majorities in both chambers of Congress.
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: April 26, 2007, 01:00:20 PM »

During his eight years in the White House, Clinton was always had scandals on his doorstep and somehow managed to fight them off.

You call getting impeached fighting off scandals?  The only reason he wasn't removed from office before his 8 years was up is because of the insane loyalty of the Democrats in congress at that time.

Perhaps you're forgetting which party held majorities in both chambers of Congress.

Yes, it should be noted that Republicans had a majority in the Senate, and yet the votes for conviction based on perjury and obstruction of justice were 55-45 against and 50-50, respectively.  That was brought about due to the fact that five Republicans (John Chafee, Susan Collins, Jim Jeffords, Olympia Snowe, and Arlen Specter) voted "not guilty" on both charges, and an additional five Republicans (Slade Gordon, Richard Shelby, Ted Stevens, Fred Thompson, and John Warner) voted "not guilty" on the charge of perjury.

Of course, it is also true that every single Democrat in the Senate voted "not guilty" on both charges, but it's kind of a stretch to say that that was the "only reason" he wasn't convicted.
Logged
Robespierre's Jaw
Senator Conor Flynn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,129
Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -8.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: April 27, 2007, 02:16:22 AM »

God, what a tool I've made of myself posting crap about Clinton fighting off scandals during his 8 years in the White House. I'm very sorry for my stuff-up.
Logged
Sensei
senseiofj324
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,532
Panama


Political Matrix
E: -2.45, S: -5.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: June 03, 2007, 08:17:44 PM »

If I were a religious man, I'd say Clinton is going to hell, but other than that, He was the best president since FDR.
Logged
gorkay
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 995


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: September 11, 2007, 04:53:27 PM »

All judgments of his presidency are provisional and speculative because of my thirty-year rule (you can't fairly judge a president until he's been out of office for about thirty years), but:

I would rate him as our best president since Truman, very effective in both domestic and foreign policy, a great communicator, a man who sincerely cared about people and their problems and tried to do something about them. A lot of the criticism about him is incredibly naive: he's ambitious (who gets to be president without a lot of ambition), he's duplicitous (hardly the only president in history who could be accused of such), he tailors his so-called beliefs to fit public opinion (ditto), his wife tells him what to think (Ronald Reagan's wife didn't?), he's ruthless to his political enemies (more ruthless than Richard Nixon?). And that's leaving out the sillier and/or more libelous accusations.

Politically, he's a very important figure, because he showed the Democrats that it was still possible for them to win the presidency, and showed them how, in the face of predictions from friend and foe alike that they were doomed to lose every four years in the foreseeable future. Personally, he's a man of great strengths and great flaws. It's to his discredit that he allowed the flaws to become the issue that they did, and to harm his ability to advocate and implement policies that could have helped a lot of people. It's to his credit that he has acknowledged this and tried to atone for it. As an ex-president, he is doing more good in the world than any since Jimmy Carter, and his bipartisan dealings with ex-President Bush are setting a good example in this age of ideological polarization.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.077 seconds with 12 queries.