Acceptance of Science Bill [Failed]

[DownWithTheLeft]

I propose an amendment to strike the whole text of the bill despite Section 3 and make

Section 1:
Marriage is between a man and a woman

Section 2:
Every man is endowed by his creator with unalienable rights

[Ebowed]

The vote on the voucher exemption amendment is 3-4.

[Ebowed]

I propose an amendment to strike the whole text of the bill despite Section 3 and make

Section 1:
Marriage is between a man and a woman

Section 2:
Every man is endowed by his creator with unalienable rights

I am blocking this amendment as frivolous (section 1 violates standing marriage law, as we don't have marriages in Atlasia)

[DownWithTheLeft]

I propose an amendment to strike the whole text of the bill despite Section 3 and make

Section 1:
Marriage is between a man and a woman

Section 2:
Every man is endowed by his creator with unalienable rights

I am blocking this amendment as frivolous (section 1 violates standing marriage law, as we don't have marriages in Atlasia)

Ok, then Section 1 reads homosexuality is immoral and unnatural, better?

[Rob]

Because "homosexuality is immoral" is what any scientist would tell you.

[Ebowed]

I propose an amendment to strike the whole text of the bill despite Section 3 and make

Section 1:
Marriage is between a man and a woman

Section 2:
Every man is endowed by his creator with unalienable rights

I am blocking this amendment as frivolous (section 1 violates standing marriage law, as we don't have marriages in Atlasia)

Ok, then Section 1 reads homosexuality is immoral and unnatural, better?

Still frivolous (section 2 violates Article VI, Clause 1) & thus blocked.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Nay

[Ebowed]

The amendment fails.

[DownWithTheLeft]

My Sec. 2 amendment stands and I propose to add a section 3 saying:

This law is only applicable to schools in Washington D.C. and other federal territories

[Ebowed]

My Sec. 2 amendment stands

No.  It is still blocked.

I motion for cloture following Sam Spade's amendment.


We are voting on the amendment to strike Section 3, Clause 2.


Nay.  What is the rationale for this?

[Sam Spade]

Aye.

[DownWithTheLeft]

Aye

[True Democrat]

When this amendment is done being vote on, could someone post an updated  version of the bill?

[Sam Spade]

When this amendment is done being vote on, could someone post an updated  version of the bill?

It's there, a couple of pages back as I recall.

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

When this amendment is done being vote on, could someone post an updated  version of the bill?

At present the bill is in the same shape as was the last time an update was posted.

--

Nay on the amendment to strike Section 3 clause 2

[Јas]

Nay

[PBrunsel]

Aye on the amendment

[Brandon H]

Aye

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Nay. Recreational use of marijuana only leads to the use of hard drugs if marijuana is illegal, since this increases the likelihood of a marijuana user meeting a hard drugs dealer.

[Ebowed]

Aye.

Do you have any particular reason for targeting that clause?

[Sam Spade]

Aye.

Do you have any particular reason for targeting that clause?

There is no definitive scientific proof on the "gateway effect's" validity or invalidity for the federal government to be regulating through spending appropriations (if I feel it should be doing it within this area of legislation anyways)

[Rob]

Nay.

[Ebowed]

The amendment fails.

[Sam Spade]

Oh well.

[Sam Spade]

If this upcoming cloture vote doesn't pass, I would like to present another amendment as follows.  If not, please ignore:
I propose an amendment to add a Section 4 to this legislation with the following wording:

This law shall only apply to the federal territory of Guam.
My amendment has been "amended".  For DWTL, only...