Debate tomorrow? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 05:51:04 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  Debate tomorrow? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Debate tomorrow?  (Read 4196 times)
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

« on: April 26, 2007, 07:34:27 PM »
« edited: April 26, 2007, 07:47:30 PM by TheresNoMoney »

Not even one question about trade or the deficit. Not one question about the decline of the middle class.  Not one question about poverty in America.

Almost a half an hour on guns and abortion. So much for the liberal media......
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

« Reply #1 on: April 26, 2007, 07:38:33 PM »

I was pretty surprised at the poor performance of Richardson and Edwards.

I thought they both did fairly well. I liked Edwards' performance especially.

Obama has definitely moved up on my list after tonight, but I'm still rooting for Biden.

Obama did not quite live up to my expectations. He needs to speak in a more direct manner and show more confidence in the coming debates.

Also, Kucinich would get an A himself, but I can't really give him that since he's not playing to win.

Kucinich defintiely livens up the debate and I enjoy his straightforward talk.

Gravel...WHY was he even there.  Yes he was funny, but I wanted a serious debate.

He was really entertaining, and I really liked his answer concerning the military-industrial complex in this country.
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

« Reply #2 on: April 26, 2007, 07:41:53 PM »

Edwards was so...without substance at times.  Richardson just looked really uncomfortable.

I thought his answers were more specific than most of the other candidates. And he is the only one who has proposed a detailed universal health care plan at this point.
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

« Reply #3 on: April 26, 2007, 07:49:19 PM »

I actually think Hillary Clinton did very well and was the most polished candidate.

Obama needs some work before the next debate.
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

« Reply #4 on: April 26, 2007, 08:52:23 PM »

the whole debate was an utter embarrasment for the Democratic Party, from beginning to end.  *shakes head* 

I'm SHOCKED you would say something like that (sarcasm intended).  Republican rule! Democrats drool!
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

« Reply #5 on: April 26, 2007, 08:58:57 PM »

yeah, Mark Warner, Evan Bayh, and Ed Rendell are Republicans! 

What about your man Bill Richardson? You've been praising him in the past. Now that he's running, he's horrible.

And I would bet good money taht even if Bayh, Warner and Rendell were running, you'd be saying the same thing. You should really just drop the whole "I'm a Democrat" act for good.
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

« Reply #6 on: April 26, 2007, 09:06:24 PM »

Bill Richardson is a Republican! 

Seriously thought, Bill Richardson is the only Democrat you haven't consistently bashed the past couple months. I'm curious as to why you think he was an embarrassment tonight.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 13 queries.