Veiled women can vote with uncovering in Canada...
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 03:41:40 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Veiled women can vote with uncovering in Canada...
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Veiled women can vote with uncovering in Canada...  (Read 5636 times)
Hash
Hashemite
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 09, 2007, 09:56:43 AM »

Discuss.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 09, 2007, 09:58:20 AM »

And the problem is... ?

Here in the US, or at least in New Jersey, all you need to match is the signature on the voter roll.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 09, 2007, 10:07:56 AM »

Well, obviously. As long as they can also vote without uncovering.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 09, 2007, 10:31:47 AM »

And the problem is... ?

Here in the US, or at least in New Jersey, all you need to match is the signature on the voter roll.

The problem is Canadian troops are fighting for the "liberation of Afghan women" in Afghanistan (its atleast one of our reasons to be there) and here in Canada we let women vote covered... Talk about that. Canada is Canada, not Saudi Arabia and I'd like to keep it that way. And you're never sure what's under a veil.

If veiled women can vote, then when I'll vote i'll be dressed in a Halloween costume, it has to be legal too!
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 09, 2007, 10:35:28 AM »

And the problem is... ?

Here in the US, or at least in New Jersey, all you need to match is the signature on the voter roll.

The problem is Canadian troops are fighting for the "liberation of Afghan women" in Afghanistan (its atleast one of our reasons to be there) and here in Canada we let women vote covered...
Uh... certainly being free includes the right to wear a veil.
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Lol. That's pretty inane.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
It probably is.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 09, 2007, 10:43:20 AM »

And the problem is... ?

Here in the US, or at least in New Jersey, all you need to match is the signature on the voter roll.

The problem is Canadian troops are fighting for the "liberation of Afghan women" in Afghanistan (its atleast one of our reasons to be there) and here in Canada we let women vote covered...
Uh... certainly being free includes the right to wear a veil.
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Lol. That's pretty inane.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
It probably is.

There's a limit to reasonable accomodations as Quebec calls it. And its time politicians enforce a secular state and stop giving immigrants everything.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 09, 2007, 10:45:35 AM »

Scroll down to bottom example. This is for German passports.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 09, 2007, 02:27:23 PM »
« Edited: September 09, 2007, 02:32:59 PM by Verily »

And the problem is... ?

Here in the US, or at least in New Jersey, all you need to match is the signature on the voter roll.

The problem is Canadian troops are fighting for the "liberation of Afghan women" in Afghanistan (its atleast one of our reasons to be there) and here in Canada we let women vote covered... Talk about that. Canada is Canada, not Saudi Arabia and I'd like to keep it that way.

Yes, and, unlike in Saudi Arabia, in Canada the women have the choice to wear or not wear the veil. If they feel that wearing the veil is an important part of their faith, well, that's their decision, not yours. The veil is not in any way interfering with the voting process.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Have you ever seen the video from Bowling for Columbine of a student pulling out about 20 guns perfectly concealed in a regular outfit?

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

It almost certainly is. You could show up in a veil to vote if you want, or dressed in women's clothing, or wearing only a bathing suit, or with all of your exposed skin painted green.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,998
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 09, 2007, 02:35:23 PM »

If you're on the voters list, and you have your voters card, it doesnt matter what you look like. I've never had to show my ID when I've voted.
Logged
ag
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,828


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 09, 2007, 06:08:07 PM »

Liberty is not wearing (or not wearing) the veil. Liberty is being able to decide for oneself. Fighting to prohibit wearing veil is, in substance, no different from fighting to force everyone to wear veil.

As long as you can prove your identity, you should be able to vote dressed in whatever costume you like. Or would you prohibit Amish, Hassidim or the like to vote? They do dress ridiculously, don't they?
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,998
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: September 09, 2007, 06:29:40 PM »

Liberty is not wearing (or not wearing) the veil. Liberty is being able to decide for oneself. Fighting to prohibit wearing veil is, in substance, no different from fighting to force everyone to wear veil.

As long as you can prove your identity, you should be able to vote dressed in whatever costume you like. Or would you prohibit Amish, Hassidim or the like to vote? They do dress ridiculously, don't they?

I don't think the amish even vote.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: September 09, 2007, 06:39:40 PM »
« Edited: September 09, 2007, 06:41:27 PM by Verily »

Liberty is not wearing (or not wearing) the veil. Liberty is being able to decide for oneself. Fighting to prohibit wearing veil is, in substance, no different from fighting to force everyone to wear veil.

As long as you can prove your identity, you should be able to vote dressed in whatever costume you like. Or would you prohibit Amish, Hassidim or the like to vote? They do dress ridiculously, don't they?

I don't think the amish even vote.

They do. At least, American Amish vote. Turnout is quite low, but they're the reason Holmes County, Ohio is so strongly Republican. (It was Blackwell's third-best county in 2006, and the only county he won in the eastern half of the state.)
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.223 seconds with 12 queries.