Some of those British MP constituency districts are really old
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 10:19:59 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Some of those British MP constituency districts are really old
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Some of those British MP constituency districts are really old  (Read 1310 times)
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,722


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 12, 2007, 05:17:54 PM »

Wycome: electing MPs 1295 to the present

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wycombe_%28UK_Parliament_constituency%29
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 12, 2007, 06:44:12 PM »
« Edited: May 12, 2007, 06:47:49 PM by Verily »

Bath, Guildford, Truro and St Austell, Winchester, and Worcester are also that old. I don't know of any others. I don't think any surviving constituency was established before 1295.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,697
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 12, 2007, 07:23:48 PM »

Bath, Guildford, Truro and St Austell, Winchester, and Worcester are also that old. I don't know of any others. I don't think any surviving constituency was established before 1295.

Well, the names are that old. The constituencies themselves, generally, aren't.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 12, 2007, 08:14:56 PM »

Bath, Guildford, Truro and St Austell, Winchester, and Worcester are also that old. I don't know of any others. I don't think any surviving constituency was established before 1295.

Well, the names are that old. The constituencies themselves, generally, aren't.

Well, all of those are named after towns, so they must still cover the same general area even if the amount of countryside around the town included has grown or shrunk.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,697
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 12, 2007, 08:22:12 PM »

Bath, Guildford, Truro and St Austell, Winchester, and Worcester are also that old. I don't know of any others. I don't think any surviving constituency was established before 1295.

Well, the names are that old. The constituencies themselves, generally, aren't.

Well, all of those are named after towns, so they must still cover the same general area even if the amount of countryside around the town included has grown or shrunk.

True, more or less, of Worcester (though you might think otherwise if after a quick glance at the Worcester boundaries of 1983-1997...) and, presumably, Bath... and maybe Guildford as well? But not the others (the Winchester seat that Labour (!) won in 1945 had more in common with what's now Eastleigh (yeah, that area has moved upmarket a lot since then) than with what's now Winchester).
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 13, 2007, 08:43:52 AM »

I posted the whole list a while back. There's quite a few dating to 1295 btw... Carlisle would be one that has probably indeed remained almost the same seat for 700 years.
Logged
Peter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,030


Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: -7.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 15, 2007, 02:55:09 PM »

I don't think any surviving constituency was established before 1295.

Lincoln has had continuous representation under that name since 1265.

True, more or less, of Worcester (though you might think otherwise if after a quick glance at the Worcester boundaries of 1983-1997...) and, presumably, Bath... and maybe Guildford as well?

Have I not ranted about the boundary commission f^^^ing around with Guildford before? I thought I had. Needless to say creating a bottleneck through Surrey countryside to add Cranleigh onto the seat was a particularly bizarre idea (and oddly has no partisan repurcussions as Cranleigh votes roughly the same way as Guildford, though for totally different reasons)
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 11 queries.