Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 21, 2014, 02:08:11 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  2008 Elections
| | |-+  2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
| | | |-+  Polls in Iowa
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Polls in Iowa  (Read 471 times)
True Democrat
true democrat
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7485
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: -2.87

View Profile
« on: May 20, 2007, 12:12:45 pm »
Ignore

This might be a stupid question to ask, but aren't polls in Iowa very unhelpful compared to primary states because Iowa is a caucus?

For example, if one candidate's support is entirely located in one area, he may win those precincts, but another candidate could win more precincts, though by smaller margins.
Logged

Michael Bloomberg for President.



Lol Winfield.  This quote is from a thread entitled "what do the following proceed to do if they are not nominated?"
Romney - President of Harvard
Gustaf
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 26969


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

View Profile
« Reply #1 on: May 22, 2007, 10:08:38 am »
Ignore

Yeah, but if you look at the polls in 2004 they were (IIRC) fairly accurate, predicting Kerry and Edwards ahead of the others. Of course, what makes things really bad is not the things you mention but the fact that people are allowed to change their vote when their candidates get knocked out in their specific caucus, etc.
Logged

This place really has become a cesspool of degenerate whores...

Economic score: +0.9
Social score: -2.61

In MN for fantasy stuff, member of the most recently dissolved centrist party.
Mr. Morden
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 20055
United States


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: May 22, 2007, 10:19:19 am »
Ignore

Yeah, but if you look at the polls in 2004 they were (IIRC) fairly accurate, predicting Kerry and Edwards ahead of the others. Of course, what makes things really bad is not the things you mention but the fact that people are allowed to change their vote when their candidates get knocked out in their specific caucus, etc.

The very last round of polling in 2004 (as in, the polls taken within about a week of the caucus) did tend to show Kerry slightly ahead, but they grossly underestimated the margin by which Kerry and Edwards finished ahead of Dean and Gephardt.  I remember going into caucus day, people were saying that any of the four main candidates (Dean, Edwards, Gephardt, Kerry) could plausibly win, because they were all packed so closely together in the polls.

And of course, for months in advance of the caucus, it was Dean and Gephardt who were leading all the polls there.  It was only at the end that Kerry and Edwards surged.

This is something that it's important to remember.  IA and NH tend to have a big impact on the race, and they can also be very unpredictable.  There's often a lot of movement in both states just days before the election (of course, some of the movement in NH is caused by fallout from the IA results).
Logged

HOG & Blondie: A Tale of Atlas Future

What is your opinion of this thread?

Watch Dave being briefed by the mods.

Being a moderator is basically like one giant party.  Except you're the one ruining the party and everyone hates you.
Jasengle
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 271
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.61, S: -0.70

View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: May 22, 2007, 11:31:59 am »
Ignore

I Think it is too Early to say
Logged

Go Big Reds
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines