The Hill: Attorney's PA-3 bid sets up possible Dem primary
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 20, 2024, 02:52:12 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  The Hill: Attorney's PA-3 bid sets up possible Dem primary
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The Hill: Attorney's PA-3 bid sets up possible Dem primary  (Read 742 times)
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 19, 2007, 03:42:41 AM »

By Aaron Blake
June 18, 2007

Attorney Tom Myers entered the Democratic primary in Pennsylvania’s 3rd district Monday, giving Democrats a second significant challenger to Rep. Phil English (R-Pa.) and setting up a potential primary next year.

Myers joins Kyle Foust, an Erie County councilman who announced an exploratory committee last month.

A seasoned campaigner who ran unsuccessfully to become chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) this cycle, English said neither challenger is a first-tier candidate.

Under-funded Democrat Steve Porter has fallen to English in consecutive elections, but the Democratic wave held the seven-term congressman to less than 54 percent of the vote in 2006 and made him a prime target in 2008.

In announcing his candidacy, Myers said the district needs someone new and cited English’s voting record on the Iraq war and his ties to President Bush. He also made a clear reference to the lack of strong candidates who have run against English in recent years.

“Phil English is part of the problem in Washington, not part of the solution,” Myers said. “The Democrats in our area are eager for a strong candidate with the ability to go toe-to-toe with Phil English.”

Democrats wrested four of their 30 takeovers from Pennsylvania Republicans in 2006 — not to mention one of its Senate seats — and they continue to focus on the state in their effort to expand their majority. English and fellow Keystone State Republican Reps. Tim Murphy and Charlie Dent join battle-tested Rep. Jim Gerlach as the new set of targets for Democrats.

Republicans are hoping to recapture the seats of freshman Democratic Reps. Jason Altmire, Joe Sestak, Patrick Murphy and Chris Carney, who all defeated incumbents last year.

Porter, an author and composer, spent less than $250,000 on each of the last two elections against English and won 40 percent and 42 percent of the vote, respectively. He self-financed about three-quarters of his campaign both times.

Myers and Foust will probably pack more fundraising punch and appeal to the national party.

http://thehill.com/campaign-2008/attorneys-pa-3-bid-sets-up-possible-dem-primary-2007-06-18.html
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 19, 2007, 03:43:40 PM »

English will hang on.

As for something else stated in the article, we're trying to win back 4, 8 and 10. The 7th (Sestak's) is nearly impossible without U.S. Attorney Meehan running and that would still be tough for the GOP.
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,545


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 19, 2007, 04:01:54 PM »

English will hang on.

As for something else stated in the article, we're trying to win back 4, 8 and 10. The 7th (Sestak's) is nearly impossible without U.S. Attorney Meehan running and that would still be tough for the GOP.

8th is going to be just as hard as 7th. 
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 19, 2007, 04:05:49 PM »

English will hang on.

As for something else stated in the article, we're trying to win back 4, 8 and 10. The 7th (Sestak's) is nearly impossible without U.S. Attorney Meehan running and that would still be tough for the GOP.

8th is going to be just as hard as 7th. 

The 8th has a heavyweight preparing for a comeback. The 7th has a heavyweight who is thinking about running but would still have an uphill battle. Fitz may have a tough race in the 8th but the district is Republican as opposed to the 7th.
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,545


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 19, 2007, 04:19:07 PM »

English will hang on.

As for something else stated in the article, we're trying to win back 4, 8 and 10. The 7th (Sestak's) is nearly impossible without U.S. Attorney Meehan running and that would still be tough for the GOP.

8th is going to be just as hard as 7th. 

The 8th has a heavyweight preparing for a comeback. The 7th has a heavyweight who is thinking about running but would still have an uphill battle. Fitz may have a tough race in the 8th but the district is Republican as opposed to the 7th.

Both districts lean Dem at the Presidential level.  The reverse coattails will hurt the Republicans running.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 19, 2007, 04:23:26 PM »

English will hang on.

As for something else stated in the article, we're trying to win back 4, 8 and 10. The 7th (Sestak's) is nearly impossible without U.S. Attorney Meehan running and that would still be tough for the GOP.

8th is going to be just as hard as 7th. 

The 8th has a heavyweight preparing for a comeback. The 7th has a heavyweight who is thinking about running but would still have an uphill battle. Fitz may have a tough race in the 8th but the district is Republican as opposed to the 7th.

Both districts lean Dem at the Presidential level.  The reverse coattails will hurt the Republicans running.

Let's see how popular the nominees are before we say how hurt the GOP candidates will be.
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,545


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 19, 2007, 04:25:04 PM »

English will hang on.

As for something else stated in the article, we're trying to win back 4, 8 and 10. The 7th (Sestak's) is nearly impossible without U.S. Attorney Meehan running and that would still be tough for the GOP.

8th is going to be just as hard as 7th. 

The 8th has a heavyweight preparing for a comeback. The 7th has a heavyweight who is thinking about running but would still have an uphill battle. Fitz may have a tough race in the 8th but the district is Republican as opposed to the 7th.

Both districts lean Dem at the Presidential level.  The reverse coattails will hurt the Republicans running.

Let's see how popular the nominees are before we say how hurt the GOP candidates will be.

It usually doesn't matter how popular the nominee is.  Just ask Ken Lucas.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 19, 2007, 04:29:35 PM »

It usually doesn't matter how popular the nominee is.  Just ask Ken Lucas.

Or we could just ask Peter Kostmayer, the former Dem Congressman from the 8th, who lost the seat in 1992 despite Clinton's win in the district, the state and the country.
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,545


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 19, 2007, 04:34:05 PM »

It usually doesn't matter how popular the nominee is.  Just ask Ken Lucas.

Or we could just ask Peter Kostmayer, the former Dem Congressman from the 8th, who lost the seat in 1992 despite Clinton's win in the district, the state and the country.

Kostmayer was involved in a big scandal and had 150 overdrafts at the House bank.  Murphy doesn't have any of that.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: June 19, 2007, 04:43:20 PM »

It usually doesn't matter how popular the nominee is.  Just ask Ken Lucas.

Or we could just ask Peter Kostmayer, the former Dem Congressman from the 8th, who lost the seat in 1992 despite Clinton's win in the district, the state and the country.

Kostmayer was involved in a big scandal and had 150 overdrafts at the House bank.  Murphy doesn't have any of that.

Well, we'll have to see. If his star begins to fade, he is definetley vulnerable. Fitz is a popular man and very well known in the district. Give the Bucks county GOP a better GOTV effort in 2008 (which I'm sure they'll have because of other big races) and it will be a close one.
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,545


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: June 19, 2007, 04:58:37 PM »

It usually doesn't matter how popular the nominee is.  Just ask Ken Lucas.

Or we could just ask Peter Kostmayer, the former Dem Congressman from the 8th, who lost the seat in 1992 despite Clinton's win in the district, the state and the country.

Kostmayer was involved in a big scandal and had 150 overdrafts at the House bank.  Murphy doesn't have any of that.

Well, we'll have to see. If his star begins to fade, he is definetley vulnerable. Fitz is a popular man and very well known in the district. Give the Bucks county GOP a better GOTV effort in 2008 (which I'm sure they'll have because of other big races) and it will be a close one.

I never said that it wouldn't be close, but if George W. Bush could not win the district in 2004 when the GOP had the best GOTV operation they could ever have, it is going to be difficult to beat a popular Dem incumbent in 2008. 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.042 seconds with 11 queries.