Survey USA: June Senator Approvals
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 11:18:38 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Survey USA: June Senator Approvals
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Survey USA: June Senator Approvals  (Read 1626 times)
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 20, 2007, 07:10:40 AM »

New June numbers in bold, 5/24/07 numbers in italics, 4/24/07 in brackets, 11/22/06 in parenthesis

Republicans:
Norm Coleman: 48-41 51-42 [53-41] (48-43)
John Cornyn: 42-43 46-40 [43-40] (45-42)
Pete Domenici: 51-42 52-42 [54-38] (68-25)
Mitch McConnell: 52-42 54-39 [53-40] (54-39)
Pat Roberts: 51-37 52-36 [48-39] (51-36)
Jeff Sessions: 59-33 60-31 [54-36] (58-32)
Gordon Smith: 47-45 48-39 [51-41] (54-37)
John Warner: 53-34 62-29 [55-33] (60-28)

Democrats:
Tom Harkin: 51-38 56-36 [57-38] (53-40)
John Kerry: 50-46 47-47 [54-41] (48-50)

Observations:
1) On the Democratic side, Kerry continues to float around 50% and I continue to hope that Republicans will actually drop some dough in vain in Massachusetts. Harkin drops back to the low-50's, which could embolden GOP Rep. Tom Latham to take a shot at a Senate race, which some argue could be a good thing for Democrats.

2) McConnell, Roberts, and Domenici continue to be happy to be a hair over 50% and even Warner has come back down to the low-50's.

3) Coleman and Smith are under 50% and Cornyn's numbers are in the gutter.

http://senate2008guru.blogspot.com/
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,014
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 20, 2007, 12:05:13 PM »

Can we finally put this silly idea of a Kerry primary challenge to rest? He even has a general net approval rating now.
Logged
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 20, 2007, 12:06:27 PM »

Can we finally put this silly idea of a Kerry primary challenge to rest? He even has a general net approval rating now.

We probably can now - I was one of the people talking about it a few months ago and I agree its not going to happen now. 
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 20, 2007, 05:47:25 PM »

Cornyn is in desperate need of a primary challenge.
Logged
Smash255
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,451


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 20, 2007, 06:17:47 PM »

Cornyn is in desperate need of a primary challenge.

Cornyn's numbers have been low for quite some time.  he is a hard core conservative from a very conservative state and to my knowledge hasn't been involved in any real scandal, hard to understand why his numbers are so poor.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 20, 2007, 08:03:38 PM »

Cornyn is in desperate need of a primary challenge.

Cornyn's numbers have been low for quite some time.  he is a hard core conservative from a very conservative state and to my knowledge hasn't been involved in any real scandal, hard to understand why his numbers are so poor.

I think he's just not very good at selling his brand. Ideologically, he's really not significantly different from Kay Bailey Hutchison.
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 21, 2007, 10:16:48 AM »

Observations:
1) On the Democratic side, Kerry continues to float around 50% and I continue to hope that Republicans will actually drop some dough in vain in Massachusetts.

Huh?  The GOP does not currently have -- and will not have by this time next year -- a credible challenger for that seat.  There is no chance in hell that Republicans would invest money in Massachusetts regardless, so whomever is holding on to such a fantasy had best let it go.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,014
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 21, 2007, 10:28:17 AM »

Yes. There is going to be no notable race in Massachusetts. I have no clue how anyone got that idea.

Kerry is not going to get a serious primary challenger. The Republicans aren't going to run a serious candidate. Kerry is going to waltz to victory. No other scenario is viable.
Logged
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 21, 2007, 10:33:38 AM »

Yes. There is going to be no notable race in Massachusetts. I have no clue how anyone got that idea.

Kerry is not going to get a serious primary challenger. The Republicans aren't going to run a serious candidate. Kerry is going to waltz to victory. No other scenario is viable.

Jerome Corsi is running against Kerry.  I predict that Kerry will do better than his 2004 Presidential performance in Massachusetts, but worse than his 2002 Senate showing or Ted Kennedy's last year.  My prediction:

MASSACHUSETTS SENATE
Kerry (D) 62%
Corsi (R) 33%
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: June 21, 2007, 10:45:32 AM »

Yes. There is going to be no notable race in Massachusetts. I have no clue how anyone got that idea.

Kerry is not going to get a serious primary challenger. The Republicans aren't going to run a serious candidate. Kerry is going to waltz to victory. No other scenario is viable.

Jerome Corsi is running against Kerry.  I predict that Kerry will do better than his 2004 Presidential performance in Massachusetts, but worse than his 2002 Senate showing or Ted Kennedy's last year.  My prediction:

MASSACHUSETTS SENATE
Kerry (D) 62%
Corsi (R) 33%


I'm sure the news will break your heart, but Corsi said earlier this year that he will not be a candidate for U.S. Senate in the great Commonwealth of Massachusetts.  The GOP is back to square one: no candidate.
Logged
Jaggerjack
Fabian_the_Fastman
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,369
Thailand


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: June 21, 2007, 10:47:58 AM »
« Edited: June 21, 2007, 10:49:53 AM by Fabian_the_Fastman »

Yes. There is going to be no notable race in Massachusetts. I have no clue how anyone got that idea.

Kerry is not going to get a serious primary challenger. The Republicans aren't going to run a serious candidate. Kerry is going to waltz to victory. No other scenario is viable.

Jerome Corsi is running against Kerry.  I predict that Kerry will do better than his 2004 Presidential performance in Massachusetts, but worse than his 2002 Senate showing or Ted Kennedy's last year.  My prediction:

MASSACHUSETTS SENATE
Kerry (D) 62%
Corsi (R) 33%


I'm sure the news will break your heart, but Corsi said earlier this year that he will not be a candidate for U.S. Senate in the great Commonwealth of Massachusetts.  The GOP is back to square one: no candidate.
And even if he did run, he'd get chiseled. He'd be running as a conservative in an ocean blue state.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,014
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: June 21, 2007, 10:59:53 AM »

Even with Corsi did run, the GOP wouldn't be stupid enough to think someone in bed with those Swift Boat Liars would be able to win a Senate seat in Massachusetts regardless of his opponent's approval ratings. I mean, they've done some stupid things before, but nothing that stupid (though I suppose thinking Mark Kennedy could actually win a Senate seat in MN comes close)
Logged
HardRCafé
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,364
Italy
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: June 21, 2007, 11:11:43 PM »

Huh?  The GOP does not currently have -- and will not have by this time next year -- a credible challenger for that seat.  There is no chance in hell that Republicans would invest money in Massachusetts regardless, so whomever is holding on to such a fantasy had best let it go.

Someone (with a green avatar) has not heard of Joel Mahoney!
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.041 seconds with 11 queries.