The next "Florida 2000" & "Ohio 2004"
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 01:44:38 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  The next "Florida 2000" & "Ohio 2004"
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Poll
Question: Which state is going to be the next "Florida 2000" & "Ohio 2004"
#1
Colorado and/or Nevada
#2
Missouri and/or Iowa
#3
Pennsylvania
#4
Michigan and/or wisconsin
#5
Again, Ohio and/or Florida
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results


Author Topic: The next "Florida 2000" & "Ohio 2004"  (Read 3709 times)
gogmagog
Rookie
**
Posts: 61


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 03, 2007, 06:59:45 AM »

Which swing state going to be one so close that even at election night nobody would be able to predict which way it goes?
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 03, 2007, 07:27:47 AM »

If polling stations in KY and IN are closing on election night and the Republican candidate is at 55% there in the intial vote count then I think weŽll see NH called really soon for the Democratic candidate. This will be a good indicator and OH, IA, NM, NV will follow suit to be in the Dem. column. If this is the case I think that CO and FL will be closest on election night.
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 03, 2007, 07:40:55 AM »

I still think OH will be called soon for the Dems and Michigan will be the closest state going to the GOP in the end.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,664
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 03, 2007, 08:01:14 AM »

The labor GOTV effort will trump any tricks by the GOP and Hillary Clinton is leading in MI than any of the Republicans are leading in the primary. In the end the Dems should win MI, unless PA flips for the republicans.
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 03, 2007, 08:06:20 AM »

Ohio 2004?  Bush won it by more than 2%, and they called it about midnight Central.  It took them longer to call Minnesota and Michigan, for God's sake.

That's not exactly comparable to "Florida 2000."
Logged
Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck
HockeyDude
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,376
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 03, 2007, 08:06:25 AM »

I believe that the Democrats have a clear advantage in Ohio in 2008, and if they take Florida it's pretty much over.  So those two are out.  Iowa took a huge swing to the Dems in '06 and Missouri has become pretty reliably Republican.  I don't see Michigan or Wisconsin going anywhere, they voted Dem in '04 and that's in a 3-pt national loss. 

Pennsylvania could be it if Guiliani is the GOP candidate.  I could see him doing well in the Philly suburbs. 

I think the western 4 (AZ, CO, NV, NM) will determine the winner in a tight race.  Considering the fact that it's looking like Rudy or Romney for the GOP....

First scenario...Romney pulls out a victory in Michigan. 



Those 4 will be very close and probably wind up determining the election.

Second scenario...Rudy takes NJ (which he probably would)



Again, those 4 determine the winner. 

Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 03, 2007, 08:08:16 AM »

Ohio 2004?  Bush won it by more than 2%, and they called it about midnight Central.  It took them longer to call Minnesota and Michigan, for God's sake.

That's not exactly comparable to "Florida 2000."

I think the issue was their pivotal status - I didn't think Kerry would lose MI or MN.
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,638
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: July 03, 2007, 08:20:11 AM »

It will be Ohio again. Everything should be the same as 2000/2004 except that Iowa will more than likely be Democratic and New Mexico will be a swing state again.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,664
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: July 03, 2007, 08:24:33 AM »
« Edited: July 03, 2007, 08:27:49 AM by Quincy »

Romney or Giuliani taking NJ or MI, the Dems are leading by larger margins than the GOP are in those states in the primary. At any rate the Romney or Thompson or Giuliani would pull an upset in IA and WI before MI or NJ.
Logged
AndrewTX
AndrewCT
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,091


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: July 03, 2007, 08:27:47 AM »

It's nearly impossible to tell right now, because it all depends on the candidate.

 If Romney is the candidate, Ohio is Dem for sure, but if it's Giuliani, than the race could become a bit more competitve, but still dem.

 
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,020
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: July 03, 2007, 09:29:29 AM »

It will be Ohio again. Everything should be the same as 2000/2004 except that Iowa will more than likely be Democratic and New Mexico will be a swing state again.

NM was a swing state in 2004. Winning a state by less than a point hardly makes it safe.
Logged
TomC
TCash101
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,976


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: July 03, 2007, 11:15:54 AM »

Ohio and Florida again
Logged
Reaganfan
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,236
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: July 03, 2007, 11:37:03 AM »


Ohio and Pennsylvania IMO
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: July 03, 2007, 11:44:54 AM »

I voted for Colorado and Nevada, as they will be the closest, but the election will be Democrat by then due to retension of Kerry states plus Ohio.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: July 03, 2007, 11:54:11 AM »

Democrats should win by enough that it doesn't matter.
Logged
AndrewTX
AndrewCT
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,091


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: July 03, 2007, 11:54:35 AM »

It will be Ohio again. Everything should be the same as 2000/2004 except that Iowa will more than likely be Democratic and New Mexico will be a swing state again.

NM was a swing state in 2004. Winning a state by less than a point hardly makes it safe.

 I don't think he was saying that it was safe, I think he was stating that Iowa will go to the Democrats, where as New Mexico will continue to be a swing state.
Logged
Likely Voter
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,344


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: July 03, 2007, 11:58:29 AM »

Ohio is the new Ohio

but the southwest is also the new ohio
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,020
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: July 03, 2007, 12:14:58 PM »

If Richardson is the Dem VP candidate, NM will not be a swing state.
Logged
poughies
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 919
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: July 03, 2007, 12:40:37 PM »

Michigan or NM/Colorado
Logged
AndrewTX
AndrewCT
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,091


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: July 03, 2007, 12:41:47 PM »

I'm still staying Colorado or Nevada
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: July 03, 2007, 01:58:22 PM »

Ohio 2004?  Bush won it by more than 2%, and they called it about midnight Central.  It took them longer to call Minnesota and Michigan, for God's sake.

That's not exactly comparable to "Florida 2000."

I think the issue was their pivotal status - I didn't think Kerry would lose MI or MN.

And yet both were about as close as Ohio was.
Logged
Reaganfan
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,236
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: July 03, 2007, 07:23:02 PM »

I loved how one of the reasons back in 2004 that the Democrats thought they would win Ohio was because of Cleveland's "bad economy". Business is moving away from the inner city of Cleveland, for "various reasons". That failed. While Northeast Ohio went Kerry, the rest Bush. I can easily see the same happening in 2008 and the Democrats being stunned why with "the Ohio GOP in shambles!"
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,020
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: July 03, 2007, 07:23:55 PM »

Take a look at Bush's current approval ratings in Ohio.
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,003
Latvia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: July 03, 2007, 07:25:08 PM »

I loved how one of the reasons back in 2004 that the Democrats thought they would win Ohio was because of Cleveland's "bad economy". Business is moving away from the inner city of Cleveland, for "various reasons". That failed. While Northeast Ohio went Kerry, the rest Bush. I can easily see the same happening in 2008 and the Democrats being stunned why with "the Ohio GOP in shambles!"

Well, back when I went to Florida in February, I remember my uncle telling me that tons of rednecks from Ohio were moving there, so I don't know if that will make a difference.
Logged
Reaganfan
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,236
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: July 03, 2007, 07:30:42 PM »


Yes indeed, if George Bush were able to run for a third term in 2008, he would get creamed here.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.051 seconds with 15 queries.